Residential segregation in metropolitan established immigrant gateways and new destinations, 1990-2000

Julie Park, John Iceland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the 1990s, many immigrants bypassed established gateways like Los Angeles, New York, Chicago, and Miami to create new immigrant destinations across the US. In this paper, we examine how segregation and spatial assimilation might differ between established gateways and new destinations among the 150 largest metropolitan areas. Using data from the 1990 and 2000 censuses, we calculate levels of dissimilarity for Hispanics and Asians by nativity for these two gateway types. Our findings show that segregation levels are consistently lower in new destinations. However, Hispanics in new destinations experienced significant increases segregation during the 1990s, suggesting a convergence in residential patterns by destination type. Nevertheless, in both destinations the native-born are less segregated than the foreign born-consistent with immigrant spatial incorporation. Finally, socioeconomic indicators are generally consistent with predictions of spatial assimilation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)811-821
Number of pages11
JournalSocial Science Research
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2011

Fingerprint

segregation
immigrant
assimilation
agglomeration area
census

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{63d8a181803349c9b650b81c35d6150c,
title = "Residential segregation in metropolitan established immigrant gateways and new destinations, 1990-2000",
abstract = "In the 1990s, many immigrants bypassed established gateways like Los Angeles, New York, Chicago, and Miami to create new immigrant destinations across the US. In this paper, we examine how segregation and spatial assimilation might differ between established gateways and new destinations among the 150 largest metropolitan areas. Using data from the 1990 and 2000 censuses, we calculate levels of dissimilarity for Hispanics and Asians by nativity for these two gateway types. Our findings show that segregation levels are consistently lower in new destinations. However, Hispanics in new destinations experienced significant increases segregation during the 1990s, suggesting a convergence in residential patterns by destination type. Nevertheless, in both destinations the native-born are less segregated than the foreign born-consistent with immigrant spatial incorporation. Finally, socioeconomic indicators are generally consistent with predictions of spatial assimilation.",
author = "Julie Park and John Iceland",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.10.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "811--821",
journal = "Social Science Research",
issn = "0049-089X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Residential segregation in metropolitan established immigrant gateways and new destinations, 1990-2000. / Park, Julie; Iceland, John David.

In: Social Science Research, Vol. 40, No. 3, 01.05.2011, p. 811-821.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Residential segregation in metropolitan established immigrant gateways and new destinations, 1990-2000

AU - Park, Julie

AU - Iceland, John

PY - 2011/5/1

Y1 - 2011/5/1

N2 - In the 1990s, many immigrants bypassed established gateways like Los Angeles, New York, Chicago, and Miami to create new immigrant destinations across the US. In this paper, we examine how segregation and spatial assimilation might differ between established gateways and new destinations among the 150 largest metropolitan areas. Using data from the 1990 and 2000 censuses, we calculate levels of dissimilarity for Hispanics and Asians by nativity for these two gateway types. Our findings show that segregation levels are consistently lower in new destinations. However, Hispanics in new destinations experienced significant increases segregation during the 1990s, suggesting a convergence in residential patterns by destination type. Nevertheless, in both destinations the native-born are less segregated than the foreign born-consistent with immigrant spatial incorporation. Finally, socioeconomic indicators are generally consistent with predictions of spatial assimilation.

AB - In the 1990s, many immigrants bypassed established gateways like Los Angeles, New York, Chicago, and Miami to create new immigrant destinations across the US. In this paper, we examine how segregation and spatial assimilation might differ between established gateways and new destinations among the 150 largest metropolitan areas. Using data from the 1990 and 2000 censuses, we calculate levels of dissimilarity for Hispanics and Asians by nativity for these two gateway types. Our findings show that segregation levels are consistently lower in new destinations. However, Hispanics in new destinations experienced significant increases segregation during the 1990s, suggesting a convergence in residential patterns by destination type. Nevertheless, in both destinations the native-born are less segregated than the foreign born-consistent with immigrant spatial incorporation. Finally, socioeconomic indicators are generally consistent with predictions of spatial assimilation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953166752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953166752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.10.009

DO - 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.10.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 25589795

AN - SCOPUS:79953166752

VL - 40

SP - 811

EP - 821

JO - Social Science Research

JF - Social Science Research

SN - 0049-089X

IS - 3

ER -