Response Bias Using Two-Stage Data Collection

A Study of Elderly Participants in a Program

Marianne Goodfellow, Nancy Ellen Kiernan, Frank Martin Ahern, Michael A. Smyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Researchers examining the effects of programs, in this case a state-level pharmaceutical assistance program for the elderly, sometimes must rely on multiple methods of data collection. Two-stage data collection (e.g., a telephone interview followed by a mail questionnaire) was used to obtain a full range of information. Older age groups were found to participate less frequently in the telephone interview, while certain demographic factors characterized mail questionnaire nonparticipants, all of which supports past research. Results also show that those in the poorest health are less likely to participate in the mail survey. Combining the two methods did not result in high attrition, suggesting that innovation can be successfully employed. Knowledge of the bias associated with each method will aid in targeting special groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)638-654
Number of pages17
JournalEvaluation Review
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988

Fingerprint

telephone interview
trend
questionnaire
mail survey
demographic factors
pharmaceutical
age group
assistance
innovation
health
Response Bias
Data Collection
Group
Questionnaire
Telephone
Health
Demographics
Innovation
Attrition
Pharmaceuticals

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Goodfellow, Marianne ; Kiernan, Nancy Ellen ; Ahern, Frank Martin ; Smyer, Michael A. / Response Bias Using Two-Stage Data Collection : A Study of Elderly Participants in a Program. In: Evaluation Review. 1988 ; Vol. 12, No. 6. pp. 638-654.
@article{32f322290d2a4212a74ea93e6a47ed71,
title = "Response Bias Using Two-Stage Data Collection: A Study of Elderly Participants in a Program",
abstract = "Researchers examining the effects of programs, in this case a state-level pharmaceutical assistance program for the elderly, sometimes must rely on multiple methods of data collection. Two-stage data collection (e.g., a telephone interview followed by a mail questionnaire) was used to obtain a full range of information. Older age groups were found to participate less frequently in the telephone interview, while certain demographic factors characterized mail questionnaire nonparticipants, all of which supports past research. Results also show that those in the poorest health are less likely to participate in the mail survey. Combining the two methods did not result in high attrition, suggesting that innovation can be successfully employed. Knowledge of the bias associated with each method will aid in targeting special groups.",
author = "Marianne Goodfellow and Kiernan, {Nancy Ellen} and Ahern, {Frank Martin} and Smyer, {Michael A.}",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0193841X8801200604",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "638--654",
journal = "Evaluation Review",
issn = "0193-841X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Response Bias Using Two-Stage Data Collection : A Study of Elderly Participants in a Program. / Goodfellow, Marianne; Kiernan, Nancy Ellen; Ahern, Frank Martin; Smyer, Michael A.

In: Evaluation Review, Vol. 12, No. 6, 01.01.1988, p. 638-654.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response Bias Using Two-Stage Data Collection

T2 - A Study of Elderly Participants in a Program

AU - Goodfellow, Marianne

AU - Kiernan, Nancy Ellen

AU - Ahern, Frank Martin

AU - Smyer, Michael A.

PY - 1988/1/1

Y1 - 1988/1/1

N2 - Researchers examining the effects of programs, in this case a state-level pharmaceutical assistance program for the elderly, sometimes must rely on multiple methods of data collection. Two-stage data collection (e.g., a telephone interview followed by a mail questionnaire) was used to obtain a full range of information. Older age groups were found to participate less frequently in the telephone interview, while certain demographic factors characterized mail questionnaire nonparticipants, all of which supports past research. Results also show that those in the poorest health are less likely to participate in the mail survey. Combining the two methods did not result in high attrition, suggesting that innovation can be successfully employed. Knowledge of the bias associated with each method will aid in targeting special groups.

AB - Researchers examining the effects of programs, in this case a state-level pharmaceutical assistance program for the elderly, sometimes must rely on multiple methods of data collection. Two-stage data collection (e.g., a telephone interview followed by a mail questionnaire) was used to obtain a full range of information. Older age groups were found to participate less frequently in the telephone interview, while certain demographic factors characterized mail questionnaire nonparticipants, all of which supports past research. Results also show that those in the poorest health are less likely to participate in the mail survey. Combining the two methods did not result in high attrition, suggesting that innovation can be successfully employed. Knowledge of the bias associated with each method will aid in targeting special groups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928509175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928509175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0193841X8801200604

DO - 10.1177/0193841X8801200604

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 638

EP - 654

JO - Evaluation Review

JF - Evaluation Review

SN - 0193-841X

IS - 6

ER -