Response of submarine hydrologic monitoring instruments to formation pressure changes

Theory and application to Nankai advanced CORKs

Audrey Hucks Sawyer, Peter Flemings, Derek Elsworth, Masataka Kinoshita

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We describe the response of a compressible submarine hydrologic monitoring instrument to formation pressure changes in low-diffusivity rock. The measured pressure depends on the frequency of the pressure signal, the hydraulic diffusivity, and the wellbore storage. The Nankai advanced circulation obviation retrofit kits (ACORKs) (offshore Japan) record tide-induced formation pressure changes with small amplitudes (<10% of seafloor amplitudes) and large phase shifts (>25°). The pressure measurements occur in thick, homogeneous, compressible, low-permeability sediment, where in situ tidal pressure responses should approximate the seafloor tidal signal. A wellbore storage of 2 × 10-8 in 3 Pa-1 can explain many of the observed tidal responses, given the hydraulic diffusivities of the monitored intervals. A reduced permeability around the wellbore of 1000-fold and a wellbore storage of 10-11 m3 Pa-1 can also reconcile the data. Our analysis suggests that ACORK screens in the Lower Shikoku Basin facies have a critical frequency on the order of 5 × 10-8 Hz (equivalent to a period of 250 days); higher-frequency formation pressure signals will be distorted in the pressure record. Within the Lower Shikoku Basin facies the time for this monitoring system to record 90% of an instantaneous pressure change is on the order of 10 d. We suggest that the ACORK instrument compliance contributes to, but does not fully explain, the small tidal amplitudes and large phase shifts recorded at the least permeable monitoring intervals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberB01102
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Volume113
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 4 2008

Fingerprint

Monitoring
monitoring
kits
diffusivity
hydraulics
permeability
Hydraulics
intervals
critical frequencies
Tides
tides
pressure measurement
Pressure measurement
Phase shift
basin
monitoring system
Japan
Sediments
sediments
phase shift

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geophysics
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

@article{5d2de9a8360841a88b270cc23dbe45d0,
title = "Response of submarine hydrologic monitoring instruments to formation pressure changes: Theory and application to Nankai advanced CORKs",
abstract = "We describe the response of a compressible submarine hydrologic monitoring instrument to formation pressure changes in low-diffusivity rock. The measured pressure depends on the frequency of the pressure signal, the hydraulic diffusivity, and the wellbore storage. The Nankai advanced circulation obviation retrofit kits (ACORKs) (offshore Japan) record tide-induced formation pressure changes with small amplitudes (<10{\%} of seafloor amplitudes) and large phase shifts (>25°). The pressure measurements occur in thick, homogeneous, compressible, low-permeability sediment, where in situ tidal pressure responses should approximate the seafloor tidal signal. A wellbore storage of 2 × 10-8 in 3 Pa-1 can explain many of the observed tidal responses, given the hydraulic diffusivities of the monitored intervals. A reduced permeability around the wellbore of 1000-fold and a wellbore storage of 10-11 m3 Pa-1 can also reconcile the data. Our analysis suggests that ACORK screens in the Lower Shikoku Basin facies have a critical frequency on the order of 5 × 10-8 Hz (equivalent to a period of 250 days); higher-frequency formation pressure signals will be distorted in the pressure record. Within the Lower Shikoku Basin facies the time for this monitoring system to record 90{\%} of an instantaneous pressure change is on the order of 10 d. We suggest that the ACORK instrument compliance contributes to, but does not fully explain, the small tidal amplitudes and large phase shifts recorded at the least permeable monitoring intervals.",
author = "Sawyer, {Audrey Hucks} and Peter Flemings and Derek Elsworth and Masataka Kinoshita",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1029/2007JB005132",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research",
issn = "0148-0227",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "1",

}

Response of submarine hydrologic monitoring instruments to formation pressure changes : Theory and application to Nankai advanced CORKs. / Sawyer, Audrey Hucks; Flemings, Peter; Elsworth, Derek; Kinoshita, Masataka.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 113, No. 1, B01102, 04.01.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response of submarine hydrologic monitoring instruments to formation pressure changes

T2 - Theory and application to Nankai advanced CORKs

AU - Sawyer, Audrey Hucks

AU - Flemings, Peter

AU - Elsworth, Derek

AU - Kinoshita, Masataka

PY - 2008/1/4

Y1 - 2008/1/4

N2 - We describe the response of a compressible submarine hydrologic monitoring instrument to formation pressure changes in low-diffusivity rock. The measured pressure depends on the frequency of the pressure signal, the hydraulic diffusivity, and the wellbore storage. The Nankai advanced circulation obviation retrofit kits (ACORKs) (offshore Japan) record tide-induced formation pressure changes with small amplitudes (<10% of seafloor amplitudes) and large phase shifts (>25°). The pressure measurements occur in thick, homogeneous, compressible, low-permeability sediment, where in situ tidal pressure responses should approximate the seafloor tidal signal. A wellbore storage of 2 × 10-8 in 3 Pa-1 can explain many of the observed tidal responses, given the hydraulic diffusivities of the monitored intervals. A reduced permeability around the wellbore of 1000-fold and a wellbore storage of 10-11 m3 Pa-1 can also reconcile the data. Our analysis suggests that ACORK screens in the Lower Shikoku Basin facies have a critical frequency on the order of 5 × 10-8 Hz (equivalent to a period of 250 days); higher-frequency formation pressure signals will be distorted in the pressure record. Within the Lower Shikoku Basin facies the time for this monitoring system to record 90% of an instantaneous pressure change is on the order of 10 d. We suggest that the ACORK instrument compliance contributes to, but does not fully explain, the small tidal amplitudes and large phase shifts recorded at the least permeable monitoring intervals.

AB - We describe the response of a compressible submarine hydrologic monitoring instrument to formation pressure changes in low-diffusivity rock. The measured pressure depends on the frequency of the pressure signal, the hydraulic diffusivity, and the wellbore storage. The Nankai advanced circulation obviation retrofit kits (ACORKs) (offshore Japan) record tide-induced formation pressure changes with small amplitudes (<10% of seafloor amplitudes) and large phase shifts (>25°). The pressure measurements occur in thick, homogeneous, compressible, low-permeability sediment, where in situ tidal pressure responses should approximate the seafloor tidal signal. A wellbore storage of 2 × 10-8 in 3 Pa-1 can explain many of the observed tidal responses, given the hydraulic diffusivities of the monitored intervals. A reduced permeability around the wellbore of 1000-fold and a wellbore storage of 10-11 m3 Pa-1 can also reconcile the data. Our analysis suggests that ACORK screens in the Lower Shikoku Basin facies have a critical frequency on the order of 5 × 10-8 Hz (equivalent to a period of 250 days); higher-frequency formation pressure signals will be distorted in the pressure record. Within the Lower Shikoku Basin facies the time for this monitoring system to record 90% of an instantaneous pressure change is on the order of 10 d. We suggest that the ACORK instrument compliance contributes to, but does not fully explain, the small tidal amplitudes and large phase shifts recorded at the least permeable monitoring intervals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40749085106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40749085106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2007JB005132

DO - 10.1029/2007JB005132

M3 - Article

VL - 113

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research

SN - 0148-0227

IS - 1

M1 - B01102

ER -