| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | W4-W6 |
| Journal | American Journal of Bioethics |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Mar 2008 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects
- Health Policy
Access to Document
Other files and links
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
Response to open peer commentaries on “strangers at the beachside : Research ethics consultation”. / Cho, Mildred K.; Tobin, Sara L.; Greely, Henry T. et al.
In: American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 8, No. 3, 03.2008, p. W4-W6.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Response to open peer commentaries on “strangers at the beachside
T2 - Research ethics consultation”
AU - Cho, Mildred K.
AU - Tobin, Sara L.
AU - Greely, Henry T.
AU - McCormick, Jennifer
AU - Boyce, Angie
AU - Magnus, David
N1 - Funding Information: Several other commentaries seemed to assume that the scope our research ethics consultation service was limited to clinical research, that all research that might be considered in such a service is necessarily on a trajectory to the bedside (van Laetham), or that our service was developed only as part of a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) planning grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). As we describe in our target article, our proposal for this service was first made in 2003, not as an outgrowth of the CTSA program (it preceded the CTSA initiative), and was initially supported by NIH and the United States Department of Energy as a service intended for genetic researchers before being incorporated into Stanford’s implementation of a proposed CTSA. While we used the term benchside to describe the kind of research we intended to include in the scope of our service, we did not mean to exclude human subjects research or draw a distinction between clinical trials and basic research. We agree with Fiore that these distinctions are unhelpful, and seek to encourage those who perceive themselves as “bench” researchers (who might or might not also be participating in clinical trials and human subjects research) to feel included in the scope of the service.
PY - 2008/3
Y1 - 2008/3
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45849147387&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45849147387&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15265160802132951
DO - 10.1080/15265160802132951
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 18570086
AN - SCOPUS:45849147387
VL - 8
SP - W4-W6
JO - American Journal of Bioethics
JF - American Journal of Bioethics
SN - 1526-5161
IS - 3
ER -