Restoring faculty vitality in academic medicine when burnout threatens

Darshana T. Shah, Valerie N. Williams, Luanne E. Thorndyke, E. Eugene Marsh, Roberta E. Sonnino, Steven M. Block, Thomas R. Viggiano

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Increasing rates of burnout - with accompanying stress and lack of engagement - among faculty, residents, students, and practicing physicians have caused alarm in academic medicine. Central to the debate among academic medicine's stakeholders are oft-competing issues of social accountability; cost containment; effectiveness of academic medicine's institutions; faculty recruitment, retention, and satisfaction; increasing expectations for faculty; and mission-based productivity. The authors propose that understanding and fostering what contributes to faculty and institutional vitality is central to preventing burnout during times of change. They first look at faculty vitality and how it is threatened by burnout, to provide a framework for a greater understanding of faculty well-being. Then they draw on higher education literature to determine how vitality is defined in academic settings and what factors affect faculty vitality within the context of academic medicine. Next, they propose a model to explain and examine faculty vitality in academic medicine, followed by a discussion of the need for a greater understanding of faculty vitality. Finally, the authors offer conclusions and propose future directions to promote faculty vitality. The authors encourage institutional decision makers and other stakeholders to focus particular attention on the evolving expectations for faculty, the risk of extensive faculty burnout, and the opportunity to reduce burnout by improving the vitality and resilience of these talented and crucial contributors. Faculty vitality, as defined by the institution, has a critical role in ensuring future institutional successes and the capacity for faculty to thrive in a complex health care economy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)979-984
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume93
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

burnout
medicine
stakeholder
cost containment
resilience
decision maker

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

Shah, D. T., Williams, V. N., Thorndyke, L. E., Marsh, E. E., Sonnino, R. E., Block, S. M., & Viggiano, T. R. (2018). Restoring faculty vitality in academic medicine when burnout threatens. Academic Medicine, 93(7), 979-984. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002013
Shah, Darshana T. ; Williams, Valerie N. ; Thorndyke, Luanne E. ; Marsh, E. Eugene ; Sonnino, Roberta E. ; Block, Steven M. ; Viggiano, Thomas R. / Restoring faculty vitality in academic medicine when burnout threatens. In: Academic Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 93, No. 7. pp. 979-984.
@article{5032ed2d255d4351b41addeecf7f5032,
title = "Restoring faculty vitality in academic medicine when burnout threatens",
abstract = "Increasing rates of burnout - with accompanying stress and lack of engagement - among faculty, residents, students, and practicing physicians have caused alarm in academic medicine. Central to the debate among academic medicine's stakeholders are oft-competing issues of social accountability; cost containment; effectiveness of academic medicine's institutions; faculty recruitment, retention, and satisfaction; increasing expectations for faculty; and mission-based productivity. The authors propose that understanding and fostering what contributes to faculty and institutional vitality is central to preventing burnout during times of change. They first look at faculty vitality and how it is threatened by burnout, to provide a framework for a greater understanding of faculty well-being. Then they draw on higher education literature to determine how vitality is defined in academic settings and what factors affect faculty vitality within the context of academic medicine. Next, they propose a model to explain and examine faculty vitality in academic medicine, followed by a discussion of the need for a greater understanding of faculty vitality. Finally, the authors offer conclusions and propose future directions to promote faculty vitality. The authors encourage institutional decision makers and other stakeholders to focus particular attention on the evolving expectations for faculty, the risk of extensive faculty burnout, and the opportunity to reduce burnout by improving the vitality and resilience of these talented and crucial contributors. Faculty vitality, as defined by the institution, has a critical role in ensuring future institutional successes and the capacity for faculty to thrive in a complex health care economy.",
author = "Shah, {Darshana T.} and Williams, {Valerie N.} and Thorndyke, {Luanne E.} and Marsh, {E. Eugene} and Sonnino, {Roberta E.} and Block, {Steven M.} and Viggiano, {Thomas R.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000002013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "979--984",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

Shah, DT, Williams, VN, Thorndyke, LE, Marsh, EE, Sonnino, RE, Block, SM & Viggiano, TR 2018, 'Restoring faculty vitality in academic medicine when burnout threatens', Academic Medicine, vol. 93, no. 7, pp. 979-984. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002013

Restoring faculty vitality in academic medicine when burnout threatens. / Shah, Darshana T.; Williams, Valerie N.; Thorndyke, Luanne E.; Marsh, E. Eugene; Sonnino, Roberta E.; Block, Steven M.; Viggiano, Thomas R.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 93, No. 7, 01.07.2018, p. 979-984.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Restoring faculty vitality in academic medicine when burnout threatens

AU - Shah, Darshana T.

AU - Williams, Valerie N.

AU - Thorndyke, Luanne E.

AU - Marsh, E. Eugene

AU - Sonnino, Roberta E.

AU - Block, Steven M.

AU - Viggiano, Thomas R.

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Increasing rates of burnout - with accompanying stress and lack of engagement - among faculty, residents, students, and practicing physicians have caused alarm in academic medicine. Central to the debate among academic medicine's stakeholders are oft-competing issues of social accountability; cost containment; effectiveness of academic medicine's institutions; faculty recruitment, retention, and satisfaction; increasing expectations for faculty; and mission-based productivity. The authors propose that understanding and fostering what contributes to faculty and institutional vitality is central to preventing burnout during times of change. They first look at faculty vitality and how it is threatened by burnout, to provide a framework for a greater understanding of faculty well-being. Then they draw on higher education literature to determine how vitality is defined in academic settings and what factors affect faculty vitality within the context of academic medicine. Next, they propose a model to explain and examine faculty vitality in academic medicine, followed by a discussion of the need for a greater understanding of faculty vitality. Finally, the authors offer conclusions and propose future directions to promote faculty vitality. The authors encourage institutional decision makers and other stakeholders to focus particular attention on the evolving expectations for faculty, the risk of extensive faculty burnout, and the opportunity to reduce burnout by improving the vitality and resilience of these talented and crucial contributors. Faculty vitality, as defined by the institution, has a critical role in ensuring future institutional successes and the capacity for faculty to thrive in a complex health care economy.

AB - Increasing rates of burnout - with accompanying stress and lack of engagement - among faculty, residents, students, and practicing physicians have caused alarm in academic medicine. Central to the debate among academic medicine's stakeholders are oft-competing issues of social accountability; cost containment; effectiveness of academic medicine's institutions; faculty recruitment, retention, and satisfaction; increasing expectations for faculty; and mission-based productivity. The authors propose that understanding and fostering what contributes to faculty and institutional vitality is central to preventing burnout during times of change. They first look at faculty vitality and how it is threatened by burnout, to provide a framework for a greater understanding of faculty well-being. Then they draw on higher education literature to determine how vitality is defined in academic settings and what factors affect faculty vitality within the context of academic medicine. Next, they propose a model to explain and examine faculty vitality in academic medicine, followed by a discussion of the need for a greater understanding of faculty vitality. Finally, the authors offer conclusions and propose future directions to promote faculty vitality. The authors encourage institutional decision makers and other stakeholders to focus particular attention on the evolving expectations for faculty, the risk of extensive faculty burnout, and the opportunity to reduce burnout by improving the vitality and resilience of these talented and crucial contributors. Faculty vitality, as defined by the institution, has a critical role in ensuring future institutional successes and the capacity for faculty to thrive in a complex health care economy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048027537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048027537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002013

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002013

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29166355

AN - SCOPUS:85048027537

VL - 93

SP - 979

EP - 984

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 7

ER -

Shah DT, Williams VN, Thorndyke LE, Marsh EE, Sonnino RE, Block SM et al. Restoring faculty vitality in academic medicine when burnout threatens. Academic Medicine. 2018 Jul 1;93(7):979-984. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002013