Rethinking CCS developing quantitative tools for analyzing investments in CCS

Jan Eide, Howard Herzog, Mort D. Webster

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lack of climate policy and CO2 markets along with a global economic slowdown suggest that we need to rethink our approach to demonstrating CCS at a commercial scale. Austerity measures make it likely that public funding will be tight in coming years, and there is a striking need to ensure that limited funds are spent optimally. Quantitative tools exist for aiding decision making under uncertainty, yet few of them have been applied to build a model that can help answer the question of what is the optimal allocation of a given amount of money across a portfolio of demonstration projects that maximizes learning about CCS. Developing such a model is the goal of this paper and we employ the model to assess the proper role of Enhanced Oil Recovery ((EOR) in a CCS demonstration portfolio. We find that if we want to maximize learning, a CCUS-only (CCS + EOR) approach to developing CCS as a mitigation technology would only be advisable if there was little uncertainty in non-EOR storage. As we believe that this condition is unlikely to be true, we suggest that U.S. policy makers should be particularly cautious in relying on a CCUS-only approach to CCS development. Nonetheless, we also find that a portfolio consisting of a mix of CCS and CCUS projects can be an effective strategy in a number of situations, notably if EOR can teach us important lessons about non-EOR storage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7647-7667
Number of pages21
JournalEnergy Procedia
Volume37
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013
Event11th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT 2012 - Kyoto, Japan
Duration: Nov 18 2012Nov 22 2012

Fingerprint

Recovery
Demonstrations
Decision making
Oils
Economics
Uncertainty

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Energy(all)

Cite this

@article{fe8b896116f043b6bf6774bf66f859cd,
title = "Rethinking CCS developing quantitative tools for analyzing investments in CCS",
abstract = "Lack of climate policy and CO2 markets along with a global economic slowdown suggest that we need to rethink our approach to demonstrating CCS at a commercial scale. Austerity measures make it likely that public funding will be tight in coming years, and there is a striking need to ensure that limited funds are spent optimally. Quantitative tools exist for aiding decision making under uncertainty, yet few of them have been applied to build a model that can help answer the question of what is the optimal allocation of a given amount of money across a portfolio of demonstration projects that maximizes learning about CCS. Developing such a model is the goal of this paper and we employ the model to assess the proper role of Enhanced Oil Recovery ((EOR) in a CCS demonstration portfolio. We find that if we want to maximize learning, a CCUS-only (CCS + EOR) approach to developing CCS as a mitigation technology would only be advisable if there was little uncertainty in non-EOR storage. As we believe that this condition is unlikely to be true, we suggest that U.S. policy makers should be particularly cautious in relying on a CCUS-only approach to CCS development. Nonetheless, we also find that a portfolio consisting of a mix of CCS and CCUS projects can be an effective strategy in a number of situations, notably if EOR can teach us important lessons about non-EOR storage.",
author = "Jan Eide and Howard Herzog and Webster, {Mort D.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.711",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "7647--7667",
journal = "Energy Procedia",
issn = "1876-6102",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Rethinking CCS developing quantitative tools for analyzing investments in CCS. / Eide, Jan; Herzog, Howard; Webster, Mort D.

In: Energy Procedia, Vol. 37, 01.01.2013, p. 7647-7667.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking CCS developing quantitative tools for analyzing investments in CCS

AU - Eide, Jan

AU - Herzog, Howard

AU - Webster, Mort D.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Lack of climate policy and CO2 markets along with a global economic slowdown suggest that we need to rethink our approach to demonstrating CCS at a commercial scale. Austerity measures make it likely that public funding will be tight in coming years, and there is a striking need to ensure that limited funds are spent optimally. Quantitative tools exist for aiding decision making under uncertainty, yet few of them have been applied to build a model that can help answer the question of what is the optimal allocation of a given amount of money across a portfolio of demonstration projects that maximizes learning about CCS. Developing such a model is the goal of this paper and we employ the model to assess the proper role of Enhanced Oil Recovery ((EOR) in a CCS demonstration portfolio. We find that if we want to maximize learning, a CCUS-only (CCS + EOR) approach to developing CCS as a mitigation technology would only be advisable if there was little uncertainty in non-EOR storage. As we believe that this condition is unlikely to be true, we suggest that U.S. policy makers should be particularly cautious in relying on a CCUS-only approach to CCS development. Nonetheless, we also find that a portfolio consisting of a mix of CCS and CCUS projects can be an effective strategy in a number of situations, notably if EOR can teach us important lessons about non-EOR storage.

AB - Lack of climate policy and CO2 markets along with a global economic slowdown suggest that we need to rethink our approach to demonstrating CCS at a commercial scale. Austerity measures make it likely that public funding will be tight in coming years, and there is a striking need to ensure that limited funds are spent optimally. Quantitative tools exist for aiding decision making under uncertainty, yet few of them have been applied to build a model that can help answer the question of what is the optimal allocation of a given amount of money across a portfolio of demonstration projects that maximizes learning about CCS. Developing such a model is the goal of this paper and we employ the model to assess the proper role of Enhanced Oil Recovery ((EOR) in a CCS demonstration portfolio. We find that if we want to maximize learning, a CCUS-only (CCS + EOR) approach to developing CCS as a mitigation technology would only be advisable if there was little uncertainty in non-EOR storage. As we believe that this condition is unlikely to be true, we suggest that U.S. policy makers should be particularly cautious in relying on a CCUS-only approach to CCS development. Nonetheless, we also find that a portfolio consisting of a mix of CCS and CCUS projects can be an effective strategy in a number of situations, notably if EOR can teach us important lessons about non-EOR storage.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898756621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898756621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.711

DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.711

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:84898756621

VL - 37

SP - 7647

EP - 7667

JO - Energy Procedia

JF - Energy Procedia

SN - 1876-6102

ER -