Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The case of public exposure to homelessness

Barrett A. Lee, Chad R. Farrell, Bruce G. Link

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using data from a national survey of public attitudes toward homeless people, this paper evaluates the applicability of the contact hypothesis to in-group/out-group relations that fail to meet the optimal conditions specified in the contact literature. Past efforts are extended by (1) moving beyond face-to-face encounters to consider multiple types of in-group exposure to a highly stigmatized out-group, (2) examining a variety of attitudinal outcomes, and (3) incorporating community context as a possible antecedent of such outcomes. Even after taking selection and social desirability processes into account, all types of exposure are found to affect public attitudes in the predicted (favorable) direction. Moreover, the size of the local homeless population-our primary measure of context-shapes opportunities for most forms of exposure and thus influences attitudes indirectly. These findings suggest that the scope of the contact hypothesis needs to be widened rather than narrowed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-63
Number of pages24
JournalAmerican sociological review
Volume69
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2004

Fingerprint

homelessness
outgroup
contact
group relations
social desirability
Group
community

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Lee, Barrett A. ; Farrell, Chad R. ; Link, Bruce G. / Revisiting the contact hypothesis : The case of public exposure to homelessness. In: American sociological review. 2004 ; Vol. 69, No. 1. pp. 40-63.
@article{71abae94aaf747ad938c132597347eb9,
title = "Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The case of public exposure to homelessness",
abstract = "Using data from a national survey of public attitudes toward homeless people, this paper evaluates the applicability of the contact hypothesis to in-group/out-group relations that fail to meet the optimal conditions specified in the contact literature. Past efforts are extended by (1) moving beyond face-to-face encounters to consider multiple types of in-group exposure to a highly stigmatized out-group, (2) examining a variety of attitudinal outcomes, and (3) incorporating community context as a possible antecedent of such outcomes. Even after taking selection and social desirability processes into account, all types of exposure are found to affect public attitudes in the predicted (favorable) direction. Moreover, the size of the local homeless population-our primary measure of context-shapes opportunities for most forms of exposure and thus influences attitudes indirectly. These findings suggest that the scope of the contact hypothesis needs to be widened rather than narrowed.",
author = "Lee, {Barrett A.} and Farrell, {Chad R.} and Link, {Bruce G.}",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/000312240406900104",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "40--63",
journal = "American Sociological Review",
issn = "0003-1224",
publisher = "American Sociological Association",
number = "1",

}

Revisiting the contact hypothesis : The case of public exposure to homelessness. / Lee, Barrett A.; Farrell, Chad R.; Link, Bruce G.

In: American sociological review, Vol. 69, No. 1, 02.2004, p. 40-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting the contact hypothesis

T2 - The case of public exposure to homelessness

AU - Lee, Barrett A.

AU - Farrell, Chad R.

AU - Link, Bruce G.

PY - 2004/2

Y1 - 2004/2

N2 - Using data from a national survey of public attitudes toward homeless people, this paper evaluates the applicability of the contact hypothesis to in-group/out-group relations that fail to meet the optimal conditions specified in the contact literature. Past efforts are extended by (1) moving beyond face-to-face encounters to consider multiple types of in-group exposure to a highly stigmatized out-group, (2) examining a variety of attitudinal outcomes, and (3) incorporating community context as a possible antecedent of such outcomes. Even after taking selection and social desirability processes into account, all types of exposure are found to affect public attitudes in the predicted (favorable) direction. Moreover, the size of the local homeless population-our primary measure of context-shapes opportunities for most forms of exposure and thus influences attitudes indirectly. These findings suggest that the scope of the contact hypothesis needs to be widened rather than narrowed.

AB - Using data from a national survey of public attitudes toward homeless people, this paper evaluates the applicability of the contact hypothesis to in-group/out-group relations that fail to meet the optimal conditions specified in the contact literature. Past efforts are extended by (1) moving beyond face-to-face encounters to consider multiple types of in-group exposure to a highly stigmatized out-group, (2) examining a variety of attitudinal outcomes, and (3) incorporating community context as a possible antecedent of such outcomes. Even after taking selection and social desirability processes into account, all types of exposure are found to affect public attitudes in the predicted (favorable) direction. Moreover, the size of the local homeless population-our primary measure of context-shapes opportunities for most forms of exposure and thus influences attitudes indirectly. These findings suggest that the scope of the contact hypothesis needs to be widened rather than narrowed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842739391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842739391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/000312240406900104

DO - 10.1177/000312240406900104

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:1842739391

VL - 69

SP - 40

EP - 63

JO - American Sociological Review

JF - American Sociological Review

SN - 0003-1224

IS - 1

ER -