Rhetoric between Orality and literacy: Cultural memory and performance in Isocrates and Aristotlen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The essay argues for a reconsideration of the role of the "literate revolution" in the disciplining of rhetorical practice in the fourth century BCE. Specifically, the argument addresses the tension between oral memory and literate rationality in Isocrates and Aristotle to illustrate two divergent possibilities of appropriating oral linguistic resources of a culture. Aristotle's literate classification of endoxa (received opinions) and pisteis (proofs) depoliticizes the oral utterances and maxims of contemporary reek culture, thereby rendering discourse a mere accessory of a political agent. By contrast, Isocrates conceives of rhetorical performance as constitutive of political agency and civic identity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)158-178
Number of pages21
JournalQuarterly Journal of Speech
Volume87
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2001

Fingerprint

Aristotle
Accessories
collective memory
Linguistics
rhetoric
literacy
Data storage equipment
rationality
performance
linguistics
discourse
resources
Rhetoric
Cultural Memory
Isocrates
Orality
Literacy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education

Cite this

@article{33bd1a94e9dc4d87be92d3170733f503,
title = "Rhetoric between Orality and literacy: Cultural memory and performance in Isocrates and Aristotlen",
abstract = "The essay argues for a reconsideration of the role of the {"}literate revolution{"} in the disciplining of rhetorical practice in the fourth century BCE. Specifically, the argument addresses the tension between oral memory and literate rationality in Isocrates and Aristotle to illustrate two divergent possibilities of appropriating oral linguistic resources of a culture. Aristotle's literate classification of endoxa (received opinions) and pisteis (proofs) depoliticizes the oral utterances and maxims of contemporary reek culture, thereby rendering discourse a mere accessory of a political agent. By contrast, Isocrates conceives of rhetorical performance as constitutive of political agency and civic identity.",
author = "Ekaterina Haskins",
year = "2001",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00335630109384327",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "158--178",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Speech",
issn = "0033-5630",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Rhetoric between Orality and literacy : Cultural memory and performance in Isocrates and Aristotlen. / Haskins, Ekaterina.

In: Quarterly Journal of Speech, Vol. 87, No. 2, 01.05.2001, p. 158-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rhetoric between Orality and literacy

T2 - Cultural memory and performance in Isocrates and Aristotlen

AU - Haskins, Ekaterina

PY - 2001/5/1

Y1 - 2001/5/1

N2 - The essay argues for a reconsideration of the role of the "literate revolution" in the disciplining of rhetorical practice in the fourth century BCE. Specifically, the argument addresses the tension between oral memory and literate rationality in Isocrates and Aristotle to illustrate two divergent possibilities of appropriating oral linguistic resources of a culture. Aristotle's literate classification of endoxa (received opinions) and pisteis (proofs) depoliticizes the oral utterances and maxims of contemporary reek culture, thereby rendering discourse a mere accessory of a political agent. By contrast, Isocrates conceives of rhetorical performance as constitutive of political agency and civic identity.

AB - The essay argues for a reconsideration of the role of the "literate revolution" in the disciplining of rhetorical practice in the fourth century BCE. Specifically, the argument addresses the tension between oral memory and literate rationality in Isocrates and Aristotle to illustrate two divergent possibilities of appropriating oral linguistic resources of a culture. Aristotle's literate classification of endoxa (received opinions) and pisteis (proofs) depoliticizes the oral utterances and maxims of contemporary reek culture, thereby rendering discourse a mere accessory of a political agent. By contrast, Isocrates conceives of rhetorical performance as constitutive of political agency and civic identity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8344280954&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=8344280954&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00335630109384327

DO - 10.1080/00335630109384327

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:8344280954

VL - 87

SP - 158

EP - 178

JO - Quarterly Journal of Speech

JF - Quarterly Journal of Speech

SN - 0033-5630

IS - 2

ER -