Rights language and disorders of consciousness: a call for advocacy

Joseph J. Fins, Megan S. Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing upon sources in neuroethics, civil rights, and disability rights law, we argue for the reintegration of people with severe brain injury back into the nexus of their families and communities consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, both of which call for the maximal integration of people with disability into society. To this end, we offer a rights-based argument to address the care of people with severe brain injury. Instead of viewing the provision of rehabilitation as a reimbursement issue, which it surely is, we argue that it can be productively understood as a question of civil rights for a population generally segregated from the medical mainstream and from society itself. Their segregation in the chronic care sector constitutes disrespect for persons, made all the more consequential because recent advances in brain injury rehabilitation make reintegration into civil society an aspirational, if not achievable goal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)670-674
Number of pages5
JournalBrain Injury
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 16 2018

Fingerprint

Language Disorders
Consciousness
Brain Injuries
Civil Rights
Disabled Persons
Rehabilitation
United Nations
Medical Societies
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuroscience (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

@article{8ba4d2b51d85452bad7601ce18513db0,
title = "Rights language and disorders of consciousness: a call for advocacy",
abstract = "Drawing upon sources in neuroethics, civil rights, and disability rights law, we argue for the reintegration of people with severe brain injury back into the nexus of their families and communities consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, both of which call for the maximal integration of people with disability into society. To this end, we offer a rights-based argument to address the care of people with severe brain injury. Instead of viewing the provision of rehabilitation as a reimbursement issue, which it surely is, we argue that it can be productively understood as a question of civil rights for a population generally segregated from the medical mainstream and from society itself. Their segregation in the chronic care sector constitutes disrespect for persons, made all the more consequential because recent advances in brain injury rehabilitation make reintegration into civil society an aspirational, if not achievable goal.",
author = "Fins, {Joseph J.} and Wright, {Megan S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1080/02699052.2018.1430377",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "670--674",
journal = "Brain Injury",
issn = "0269-9052",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "5",

}

Rights language and disorders of consciousness : a call for advocacy. / Fins, Joseph J.; Wright, Megan S.

In: Brain Injury, Vol. 32, No. 5, 16.04.2018, p. 670-674.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rights language and disorders of consciousness

T2 - a call for advocacy

AU - Fins, Joseph J.

AU - Wright, Megan S.

PY - 2018/4/16

Y1 - 2018/4/16

N2 - Drawing upon sources in neuroethics, civil rights, and disability rights law, we argue for the reintegration of people with severe brain injury back into the nexus of their families and communities consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, both of which call for the maximal integration of people with disability into society. To this end, we offer a rights-based argument to address the care of people with severe brain injury. Instead of viewing the provision of rehabilitation as a reimbursement issue, which it surely is, we argue that it can be productively understood as a question of civil rights for a population generally segregated from the medical mainstream and from society itself. Their segregation in the chronic care sector constitutes disrespect for persons, made all the more consequential because recent advances in brain injury rehabilitation make reintegration into civil society an aspirational, if not achievable goal.

AB - Drawing upon sources in neuroethics, civil rights, and disability rights law, we argue for the reintegration of people with severe brain injury back into the nexus of their families and communities consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, both of which call for the maximal integration of people with disability into society. To this end, we offer a rights-based argument to address the care of people with severe brain injury. Instead of viewing the provision of rehabilitation as a reimbursement issue, which it surely is, we argue that it can be productively understood as a question of civil rights for a population generally segregated from the medical mainstream and from society itself. Their segregation in the chronic care sector constitutes disrespect for persons, made all the more consequential because recent advances in brain injury rehabilitation make reintegration into civil society an aspirational, if not achievable goal.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041624572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041624572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02699052.2018.1430377

DO - 10.1080/02699052.2018.1430377

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 29393694

AN - SCOPUS:85041624572

VL - 32

SP - 670

EP - 674

JO - Brain Injury

JF - Brain Injury

SN - 0269-9052

IS - 5

ER -