Robust Climate Policies Under Uncertainty: A Comparison of Robust Decision Making and Info-Gap Methods

Jim W. Hall, Robert J. Lempert, Klaus Keller, Andrew Hackbarth, Christophe Mijere, David J. Mcinerney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

138 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compares two widely used approaches for robustness analysis of decision problems: the info-gap method originally developed by Ben-Haim and the robust decision making (RDM) approach originally developed by Lempert, Popper, and Bankes. The study uses each approach to evaluate alternative paths for climate-altering greenhouse gas emissions given the potential for nonlinear threshold responses in the climate system, significant uncertainty about such a threshold response and a variety of other key parameters, as well as the ability to learn about any threshold responses over time. Info-gap and RDM share many similarities. Both represent uncertainty as sets of multiple plausible futures, and both seek to identify robust strategies whose performance is insensitive to uncertainties. Yet they also exhibit important differences, as they arrange their analyses in different orders, treat losses and gains in different ways, and take different approaches to imprecise probabilistic information. The study finds that the two approaches reach similar but not identical policy recommendations and that their differing attributes raise important questions about their appropriate roles in decision support applications. The comparison not only improves understanding of these specific methods, it also suggests some broader insights into robustness approaches and a framework for comparing them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1657-1672
Number of pages16
JournalRisk Analysis
Volume32
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2012

Fingerprint

Climate
Uncertainty
Decision Making
Decision making
Aptitude
Decision Support Techniques
Gas emissions
Greenhouse gases
Gases

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Hall, Jim W. ; Lempert, Robert J. ; Keller, Klaus ; Hackbarth, Andrew ; Mijere, Christophe ; Mcinerney, David J. / Robust Climate Policies Under Uncertainty : A Comparison of Robust Decision Making and Info-Gap Methods. In: Risk Analysis. 2012 ; Vol. 32, No. 10. pp. 1657-1672.
@article{4853deede690413490531a741db1818a,
title = "Robust Climate Policies Under Uncertainty: A Comparison of Robust Decision Making and Info-Gap Methods",
abstract = "This study compares two widely used approaches for robustness analysis of decision problems: the info-gap method originally developed by Ben-Haim and the robust decision making (RDM) approach originally developed by Lempert, Popper, and Bankes. The study uses each approach to evaluate alternative paths for climate-altering greenhouse gas emissions given the potential for nonlinear threshold responses in the climate system, significant uncertainty about such a threshold response and a variety of other key parameters, as well as the ability to learn about any threshold responses over time. Info-gap and RDM share many similarities. Both represent uncertainty as sets of multiple plausible futures, and both seek to identify robust strategies whose performance is insensitive to uncertainties. Yet they also exhibit important differences, as they arrange their analyses in different orders, treat losses and gains in different ways, and take different approaches to imprecise probabilistic information. The study finds that the two approaches reach similar but not identical policy recommendations and that their differing attributes raise important questions about their appropriate roles in decision support applications. The comparison not only improves understanding of these specific methods, it also suggests some broader insights into robustness approaches and a framework for comparing them.",
author = "Hall, {Jim W.} and Lempert, {Robert J.} and Klaus Keller and Andrew Hackbarth and Christophe Mijere and Mcinerney, {David J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01802.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "1657--1672",
journal = "Risk Analysis",
issn = "0272-4332",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

Robust Climate Policies Under Uncertainty : A Comparison of Robust Decision Making and Info-Gap Methods. / Hall, Jim W.; Lempert, Robert J.; Keller, Klaus; Hackbarth, Andrew; Mijere, Christophe; Mcinerney, David J.

In: Risk Analysis, Vol. 32, No. 10, 01.10.2012, p. 1657-1672.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robust Climate Policies Under Uncertainty

T2 - A Comparison of Robust Decision Making and Info-Gap Methods

AU - Hall, Jim W.

AU - Lempert, Robert J.

AU - Keller, Klaus

AU - Hackbarth, Andrew

AU - Mijere, Christophe

AU - Mcinerney, David J.

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - This study compares two widely used approaches for robustness analysis of decision problems: the info-gap method originally developed by Ben-Haim and the robust decision making (RDM) approach originally developed by Lempert, Popper, and Bankes. The study uses each approach to evaluate alternative paths for climate-altering greenhouse gas emissions given the potential for nonlinear threshold responses in the climate system, significant uncertainty about such a threshold response and a variety of other key parameters, as well as the ability to learn about any threshold responses over time. Info-gap and RDM share many similarities. Both represent uncertainty as sets of multiple plausible futures, and both seek to identify robust strategies whose performance is insensitive to uncertainties. Yet they also exhibit important differences, as they arrange their analyses in different orders, treat losses and gains in different ways, and take different approaches to imprecise probabilistic information. The study finds that the two approaches reach similar but not identical policy recommendations and that their differing attributes raise important questions about their appropriate roles in decision support applications. The comparison not only improves understanding of these specific methods, it also suggests some broader insights into robustness approaches and a framework for comparing them.

AB - This study compares two widely used approaches for robustness analysis of decision problems: the info-gap method originally developed by Ben-Haim and the robust decision making (RDM) approach originally developed by Lempert, Popper, and Bankes. The study uses each approach to evaluate alternative paths for climate-altering greenhouse gas emissions given the potential for nonlinear threshold responses in the climate system, significant uncertainty about such a threshold response and a variety of other key parameters, as well as the ability to learn about any threshold responses over time. Info-gap and RDM share many similarities. Both represent uncertainty as sets of multiple plausible futures, and both seek to identify robust strategies whose performance is insensitive to uncertainties. Yet they also exhibit important differences, as they arrange their analyses in different orders, treat losses and gains in different ways, and take different approaches to imprecise probabilistic information. The study finds that the two approaches reach similar but not identical policy recommendations and that their differing attributes raise important questions about their appropriate roles in decision support applications. The comparison not only improves understanding of these specific methods, it also suggests some broader insights into robustness approaches and a framework for comparing them.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866991683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866991683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01802.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01802.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 22519664

AN - SCOPUS:84866991683

VL - 32

SP - 1657

EP - 1672

JO - Risk Analysis

JF - Risk Analysis

SN - 0272-4332

IS - 10

ER -