TY - CONF
T1 - Role of concentrated flow pathways on the movement of pesticides through agricultural fields and riparian buffer zones
AU - Chandler, Joseph W.
AU - Preisendanz, Heather E.
AU - Veith, Tamie L.
AU - Elkin, Kyle R.
AU - Elliott, Herschel A.
AU - Watson, John E.
AU - Kleinman, Peter J.A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Joseph W. Chandler was funded by the Pennsylvania State University Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. H.E. Preisendanz, H.A. Elliott, and J.E. Watson are supported, in part, by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Federal Appropriations under Project PEN04574 and Accession number 1004448. H.E. Preisendanz is supported, in part, by the Pennsylvania State University Institutes of Energy and the Environment. The authors express their gratitude to Terry Troutman and Todd Strobecker at the USDA-ARS Klingerstown, PA location for providing soil sampling materials and facilitating access to field sites, as well as Jim Richards for providing pesticide application information. Additional gratitude is extended to Dr. Cibin Raj, Ryan Barnes, Melanie Nowin, Faith Kibuye, Talia Leventhal, and Kathryn Hayden for their assistance collecting soil samples in the field; Tucker Wells and Jamie Weikel for help extracting soil samples in the lab; and Eric Hagan for field assistance. H.E. Preisendanz and J.W. Chandler would each like to acknowledge their respective daughters, Maya Gall and Anna Chandler, for their understanding and patience during the final writing stages of this publication, which occurred during the stay-at-home orders during the COVID-19 pandemic that turned living rooms into home offices at the time this paper was due. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by The Pennsylvania State University or the U.S. Department of Agriculture. All entities are equal opportunity providers and employers.
Funding Information:
Joseph W. Chandler was funded by the Pennsylvania State University Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. H.E. Preisendanz, H.A. Elliott, and J.E. Watson are supported, in part, by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Federal Appropriations under Project PEN04574 and Accession number 1004448. H.E. Preisendanz is supported, in part, by the Pennsylvania State University Institutes of Energy and the Environment. The authors express their gratitude to Terry Troutman and Todd Strobecker at the USDA-ARS Klingerstown, PA location for providing soil sampling materials and facilitating access to field sites, as well as Jim Richards for providing pesticide application information. Additional gratitude is extended to Dr. Cibin Raj, Ryan Barnes, Melanie Nowin, Faith Kibuye, Talia Leventhal, and Kathryn Hayden for their assistance collecting soil samples in the field; Tucker Wells and Jamie Weikel for help extracting soil samples in the lab; and Eric Hagan for field assistance. H.E. Preisendanz and J.W. Chandler would each like to acknowledge their respective daughters, Maya Gall and Anna Chandler, for their understanding and patience during the final writing stages of this publication, which occurred during the stay-at-home orders during the COVID-19 pandemic that turned living rooms into home offices at the time this paper was due.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 EDP Sciences. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Riparian buffers are an important component of watershed management strategies aimed at improving surface water quality. Under ideal conditions, they are well-documented to effectively mitigate nutrients and pesticides in agricultural runoff. However, previous studies have shown that the performance of vegetated buffers can be undermined by the development of concentrated flow pathways (CFPs) that bypass the vegetation, thereby limiting water quality benefits. To understand the occurrence and potential effects of CFPs on pesticide transport from agricultural fields to nearby streams, soil samples (0-2 cm depth) were collected along surface runoff pathways from the field to the stream for nine sites in a Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) site in the ridge and valley physiographic region of Pennsylvania. At each site, samples were collected in areas where sheet flow was likely occurring and in CFPs to identify the potential for CFPs to act as sources or sinks of pesticides along the flow path. Samples were extracted for three pesticides of interest: atrazine, metolachlor, and imidacloprid. Two dominant patterns emerged, with concentrations found to be either mitigated or enhanced in CFPs based on pesticide application to surrounding land use. Sites in the first category were row-cropped fields that received inputs of all three pesticides. Concentrations were highest in the non-concentrated flow areas in the field, suggesting that as pesticides are transported across the row-cropped fields, they are mitigated prior to reaching the stream. In contrast, sites in the second category included hay fields that had not been treated with any of the pesticides of interest. Concentrations were highest in the CFPs, suggesting that CFPs were bringing pesticides into the hay fields from upgradient row-crop fields. The results of this study highlight the importance of the land management factors and hydrologic connectivity that cause CFPs to serve different functions (mitigation or enhancement) as runoff is conveyed from the field, to a buffer, and ultimately to an adjacent stream. Further, the results highlight the need for design and maintenance solutions addressing the erosion and sediment control issues that commonly undermine agricultural buffer effectiveness.
AB - Riparian buffers are an important component of watershed management strategies aimed at improving surface water quality. Under ideal conditions, they are well-documented to effectively mitigate nutrients and pesticides in agricultural runoff. However, previous studies have shown that the performance of vegetated buffers can be undermined by the development of concentrated flow pathways (CFPs) that bypass the vegetation, thereby limiting water quality benefits. To understand the occurrence and potential effects of CFPs on pesticide transport from agricultural fields to nearby streams, soil samples (0-2 cm depth) were collected along surface runoff pathways from the field to the stream for nine sites in a Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) site in the ridge and valley physiographic region of Pennsylvania. At each site, samples were collected in areas where sheet flow was likely occurring and in CFPs to identify the potential for CFPs to act as sources or sinks of pesticides along the flow path. Samples were extracted for three pesticides of interest: atrazine, metolachlor, and imidacloprid. Two dominant patterns emerged, with concentrations found to be either mitigated or enhanced in CFPs based on pesticide application to surrounding land use. Sites in the first category were row-cropped fields that received inputs of all three pesticides. Concentrations were highest in the non-concentrated flow areas in the field, suggesting that as pesticides are transported across the row-cropped fields, they are mitigated prior to reaching the stream. In contrast, sites in the second category included hay fields that had not been treated with any of the pesticides of interest. Concentrations were highest in the CFPs, suggesting that CFPs were bringing pesticides into the hay fields from upgradient row-crop fields. The results of this study highlight the importance of the land management factors and hydrologic connectivity that cause CFPs to serve different functions (mitigation or enhancement) as runoff is conveyed from the field, to a buffer, and ultimately to an adjacent stream. Further, the results highlight the need for design and maintenance solutions addressing the erosion and sediment control issues that commonly undermine agricultural buffer effectiveness.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102252795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102252795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.13031/aim.202001630
DO - 10.13031/aim.202001630
M3 - Paper
AN - SCOPUS:85102252795
SP - 3
EP - 17
T2 - 2020 ASABE Annual International Meeting
Y2 - 13 July 2020 through 15 July 2020
ER -