Rootstock vigor shifts aboveground response to groundcover competition in young grapevines

Suzanne M. Fleishman, David Eissenstat, Michela Centinari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aims: Vegetative groundcover and rootstock selection are popular growth control practices for fruit and nut crops. Theoretically, plant potential growth rate should influence competitive effectiveness; however, it is unclear if rootstock vigor alters crop productivity when groundcover is present. Methods: In a humid-climate vineyard we grew young grapevines on low- and medium-vigor rootstocks with and without groundcover. Vegetative growth was determined on dormant stems; yield was determined at harvest. Roots were extracted with soil cores and distribution, morphology, and mycorrhizal colonization were determined. Resource competition was assessed by water and nutrient depletion in vines and soil. Results: Compared to vines on low-vigor rootstocks, vines on medium-vigor rootstocks exhibited greater reductions in vegetative (40% vs 19%) and reproductive (22% vs 0%) growth by presence of groundcover. Irrespective of rootstock vigor, grapevine root systems coped with competition by increasing specific root length, decreasing absorptive root diameter, and redistributing roots deeper. Competition for nutrients was the apparent main cause of growth reductions with groundcover; however, mechanisms for differential rootstock responses remain unclear. Conclusions: This study suggests that in a wet year, young grapevines grafted on low-vigor rootstocks may be more tolerant of groundcover competition than those on medium-vigor rootstocks; however, both rootstocks cope with a similar root response.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)151-165
Number of pages15
JournalPlant and Soil
Volume440
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 14 2019

Fingerprint

rootstock
ground cover plants
vigor
rootstocks
vine
vines
nut crops
young
crop
humid zones
nutrient
nut
fruit crops
vineyard
nutrients
root system
vineyards
growth retardation
vegetative growth
root systems

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Soil Science
  • Plant Science

Cite this

@article{a78c21be4e2e45c199e97e9c3675d690,
title = "Rootstock vigor shifts aboveground response to groundcover competition in young grapevines",
abstract = "Aims: Vegetative groundcover and rootstock selection are popular growth control practices for fruit and nut crops. Theoretically, plant potential growth rate should influence competitive effectiveness; however, it is unclear if rootstock vigor alters crop productivity when groundcover is present. Methods: In a humid-climate vineyard we grew young grapevines on low- and medium-vigor rootstocks with and without groundcover. Vegetative growth was determined on dormant stems; yield was determined at harvest. Roots were extracted with soil cores and distribution, morphology, and mycorrhizal colonization were determined. Resource competition was assessed by water and nutrient depletion in vines and soil. Results: Compared to vines on low-vigor rootstocks, vines on medium-vigor rootstocks exhibited greater reductions in vegetative (40{\%} vs 19{\%}) and reproductive (22{\%} vs 0{\%}) growth by presence of groundcover. Irrespective of rootstock vigor, grapevine root systems coped with competition by increasing specific root length, decreasing absorptive root diameter, and redistributing roots deeper. Competition for nutrients was the apparent main cause of growth reductions with groundcover; however, mechanisms for differential rootstock responses remain unclear. Conclusions: This study suggests that in a wet year, young grapevines grafted on low-vigor rootstocks may be more tolerant of groundcover competition than those on medium-vigor rootstocks; however, both rootstocks cope with a similar root response.",
author = "Fleishman, {Suzanne M.} and David Eissenstat and Michela Centinari",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1007/s11104-019-04059-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "440",
pages = "151--165",
journal = "Plant and Soil",
issn = "0032-079X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1-2",

}

Rootstock vigor shifts aboveground response to groundcover competition in young grapevines. / Fleishman, Suzanne M.; Eissenstat, David; Centinari, Michela.

In: Plant and Soil, Vol. 440, No. 1-2, 14.07.2019, p. 151-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rootstock vigor shifts aboveground response to groundcover competition in young grapevines

AU - Fleishman, Suzanne M.

AU - Eissenstat, David

AU - Centinari, Michela

PY - 2019/7/14

Y1 - 2019/7/14

N2 - Aims: Vegetative groundcover and rootstock selection are popular growth control practices for fruit and nut crops. Theoretically, plant potential growth rate should influence competitive effectiveness; however, it is unclear if rootstock vigor alters crop productivity when groundcover is present. Methods: In a humid-climate vineyard we grew young grapevines on low- and medium-vigor rootstocks with and without groundcover. Vegetative growth was determined on dormant stems; yield was determined at harvest. Roots were extracted with soil cores and distribution, morphology, and mycorrhizal colonization were determined. Resource competition was assessed by water and nutrient depletion in vines and soil. Results: Compared to vines on low-vigor rootstocks, vines on medium-vigor rootstocks exhibited greater reductions in vegetative (40% vs 19%) and reproductive (22% vs 0%) growth by presence of groundcover. Irrespective of rootstock vigor, grapevine root systems coped with competition by increasing specific root length, decreasing absorptive root diameter, and redistributing roots deeper. Competition for nutrients was the apparent main cause of growth reductions with groundcover; however, mechanisms for differential rootstock responses remain unclear. Conclusions: This study suggests that in a wet year, young grapevines grafted on low-vigor rootstocks may be more tolerant of groundcover competition than those on medium-vigor rootstocks; however, both rootstocks cope with a similar root response.

AB - Aims: Vegetative groundcover and rootstock selection are popular growth control practices for fruit and nut crops. Theoretically, plant potential growth rate should influence competitive effectiveness; however, it is unclear if rootstock vigor alters crop productivity when groundcover is present. Methods: In a humid-climate vineyard we grew young grapevines on low- and medium-vigor rootstocks with and without groundcover. Vegetative growth was determined on dormant stems; yield was determined at harvest. Roots were extracted with soil cores and distribution, morphology, and mycorrhizal colonization were determined. Resource competition was assessed by water and nutrient depletion in vines and soil. Results: Compared to vines on low-vigor rootstocks, vines on medium-vigor rootstocks exhibited greater reductions in vegetative (40% vs 19%) and reproductive (22% vs 0%) growth by presence of groundcover. Irrespective of rootstock vigor, grapevine root systems coped with competition by increasing specific root length, decreasing absorptive root diameter, and redistributing roots deeper. Competition for nutrients was the apparent main cause of growth reductions with groundcover; however, mechanisms for differential rootstock responses remain unclear. Conclusions: This study suggests that in a wet year, young grapevines grafted on low-vigor rootstocks may be more tolerant of groundcover competition than those on medium-vigor rootstocks; however, both rootstocks cope with a similar root response.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064841425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064841425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11104-019-04059-0

DO - 10.1007/s11104-019-04059-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064841425

VL - 440

SP - 151

EP - 165

JO - Plant and Soil

JF - Plant and Soil

SN - 0032-079X

IS - 1-2

ER -