TY - JOUR
T1 - Rootstock vigor shifts aboveground response to groundcover competition in young grapevines
AU - Fleishman, Suzanne M.
AU - Eissenstat, David M.
AU - Centinari, Michela
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, through the Northeast Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education program under subaward number GNE16-119 and by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Federal Appropriation under Project PEN0 4628 and Accession number 1014131. Partial support was also provided by the DOE Terrestrial Ecosystems Program to DME (DE-SC0012003) and the Pennsylvania Wine Marketing Research Board to MC. The authors thank Don Smith and the staff of the Horticulture Farm at Pennsylvania State University for technical assistance, Anastasiya Kowal for field assistance, and Richard Marini for statistical consultation and a critical reading of the manuscript.
Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, through the Northeast Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education program under subaward number GNE16-119 and by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Federal Appropriation under Project PEN0 4628 and Accession number 1014131. Partial support was also provided by the DOE Terrestrial Ecosystems Program to DME (DE-SC0012003) and the Pennsylvania Wine Marketing Research Board to MC. The authors thank Don Smith and the staff of the Horticulture Farm at Pennsylvania State University for technical assistance, Anastasiya Kowal for field assistance, and Richard Marini for statistical consultation and a critical reading of the manuscript.
PY - 2019/7/14
Y1 - 2019/7/14
N2 - Aims: Vegetative groundcover and rootstock selection are popular growth control practices for fruit and nut crops. Theoretically, plant potential growth rate should influence competitive effectiveness; however, it is unclear if rootstock vigor alters crop productivity when groundcover is present. Methods: In a humid-climate vineyard we grew young grapevines on low- and medium-vigor rootstocks with and without groundcover. Vegetative growth was determined on dormant stems; yield was determined at harvest. Roots were extracted with soil cores and distribution, morphology, and mycorrhizal colonization were determined. Resource competition was assessed by water and nutrient depletion in vines and soil. Results: Compared to vines on low-vigor rootstocks, vines on medium-vigor rootstocks exhibited greater reductions in vegetative (40% vs 19%) and reproductive (22% vs 0%) growth by presence of groundcover. Irrespective of rootstock vigor, grapevine root systems coped with competition by increasing specific root length, decreasing absorptive root diameter, and redistributing roots deeper. Competition for nutrients was the apparent main cause of growth reductions with groundcover; however, mechanisms for differential rootstock responses remain unclear. Conclusions: This study suggests that in a wet year, young grapevines grafted on low-vigor rootstocks may be more tolerant of groundcover competition than those on medium-vigor rootstocks; however, both rootstocks cope with a similar root response.
AB - Aims: Vegetative groundcover and rootstock selection are popular growth control practices for fruit and nut crops. Theoretically, plant potential growth rate should influence competitive effectiveness; however, it is unclear if rootstock vigor alters crop productivity when groundcover is present. Methods: In a humid-climate vineyard we grew young grapevines on low- and medium-vigor rootstocks with and without groundcover. Vegetative growth was determined on dormant stems; yield was determined at harvest. Roots were extracted with soil cores and distribution, morphology, and mycorrhizal colonization were determined. Resource competition was assessed by water and nutrient depletion in vines and soil. Results: Compared to vines on low-vigor rootstocks, vines on medium-vigor rootstocks exhibited greater reductions in vegetative (40% vs 19%) and reproductive (22% vs 0%) growth by presence of groundcover. Irrespective of rootstock vigor, grapevine root systems coped with competition by increasing specific root length, decreasing absorptive root diameter, and redistributing roots deeper. Competition for nutrients was the apparent main cause of growth reductions with groundcover; however, mechanisms for differential rootstock responses remain unclear. Conclusions: This study suggests that in a wet year, young grapevines grafted on low-vigor rootstocks may be more tolerant of groundcover competition than those on medium-vigor rootstocks; however, both rootstocks cope with a similar root response.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064841425&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064841425&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11104-019-04059-0
DO - 10.1007/s11104-019-04059-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85064841425
SN - 0032-079X
VL - 440
SP - 151
EP - 165
JO - Plant and Soil
JF - Plant and Soil
IS - 1-2
ER -