Routine completion study during carotid endarterectomy is not necessary

Krishna M. Jain, Eugene Simoni, John S. Munn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The results of many studies have suggested the need for a completion study during carotid endarterectomy (CE). This paper describes our experience not routinely using completion studies. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 417 patients who underwent 455 CEs. Demographic features, risk factors, ipsilateral neurologic events during the first 30 days, and mortality data were identified. There were 14 neurologic events and 4 deaths. No technical defects were found in 13 patients; 1 patient did not have exploratory surgery after an occlusion. Long-term follow-up shows 10 of the 14 arteries are open. Two patients were lost to follow-up, 1 patient died, and 1 artery was not explored. We conclude that CE may be carried out without routinely using a completion study, with an acceptable postoperative neurologic complication rate. Careful technique is mandatory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)163-167
Number of pages5
JournalThe American Journal of Surgery
Volume168
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

Fingerprint

Carotid Endarterectomy
Nervous System
Arteries
Lost to Follow-Up
Demography
Mortality

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

@article{ec2925a9abd14b7a878a45f1fd32c207,
title = "Routine completion study during carotid endarterectomy is not necessary",
abstract = "The results of many studies have suggested the need for a completion study during carotid endarterectomy (CE). This paper describes our experience not routinely using completion studies. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 417 patients who underwent 455 CEs. Demographic features, risk factors, ipsilateral neurologic events during the first 30 days, and mortality data were identified. There were 14 neurologic events and 4 deaths. No technical defects were found in 13 patients; 1 patient did not have exploratory surgery after an occlusion. Long-term follow-up shows 10 of the 14 arteries are open. Two patients were lost to follow-up, 1 patient died, and 1 artery was not explored. We conclude that CE may be carried out without routinely using a completion study, with an acceptable postoperative neurologic complication rate. Careful technique is mandatory.",
author = "Jain, {Krishna M.} and Eugene Simoni and Munn, {John S.}",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9610(94)80059-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "168",
pages = "163--167",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Routine completion study during carotid endarterectomy is not necessary. / Jain, Krishna M.; Simoni, Eugene; Munn, John S.

In: The American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 168, No. 2, 01.01.1994, p. 163-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Routine completion study during carotid endarterectomy is not necessary

AU - Jain, Krishna M.

AU - Simoni, Eugene

AU - Munn, John S.

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - The results of many studies have suggested the need for a completion study during carotid endarterectomy (CE). This paper describes our experience not routinely using completion studies. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 417 patients who underwent 455 CEs. Demographic features, risk factors, ipsilateral neurologic events during the first 30 days, and mortality data were identified. There were 14 neurologic events and 4 deaths. No technical defects were found in 13 patients; 1 patient did not have exploratory surgery after an occlusion. Long-term follow-up shows 10 of the 14 arteries are open. Two patients were lost to follow-up, 1 patient died, and 1 artery was not explored. We conclude that CE may be carried out without routinely using a completion study, with an acceptable postoperative neurologic complication rate. Careful technique is mandatory.

AB - The results of many studies have suggested the need for a completion study during carotid endarterectomy (CE). This paper describes our experience not routinely using completion studies. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 417 patients who underwent 455 CEs. Demographic features, risk factors, ipsilateral neurologic events during the first 30 days, and mortality data were identified. There were 14 neurologic events and 4 deaths. No technical defects were found in 13 patients; 1 patient did not have exploratory surgery after an occlusion. Long-term follow-up shows 10 of the 14 arteries are open. Two patients were lost to follow-up, 1 patient died, and 1 artery was not explored. We conclude that CE may be carried out without routinely using a completion study, with an acceptable postoperative neurologic complication rate. Careful technique is mandatory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028004036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028004036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9610(94)80059-6

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9610(94)80059-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 8053518

AN - SCOPUS:0028004036

VL - 168

SP - 163

EP - 167

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 2

ER -