Routine contrast enema is not required for all infants prior to ostomy reversal: A 10-year single-center experience

Christa Grant, Jamie M. Golden, Dean M. Anselmo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of intestinal stricture is low for most conditions requiring a primary small bowel stoma in infants. Routine performance of contrast enemas (CE) prior to stoma closure adds cost and radiation exposure. We hypothesized that routine CE prior to ostomy reversal is not necessary in all infants, and sought to identify a subset of patients who may benefit from preoperative CE. Methods: Medical records of infants under age 1 (N = 161) undergoing small bowel stoma reversal at a single institution between 2003 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Student's T-test was used to compare groups. Results: Contrast enemas were performed on 80% of all infants undergoing small bowel ostomy reversal during the study period. Infants with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were more likely to have a CE than those with intestinal atresia (p = 0.03) or those with all other diagnoses combined (p = 0.03). Nine strictures were identified on CE. Of those, 8 (89%) were in patients with NEC, and only 4 were clinically significant and required operative resection. The overall relevant stricture rate was 2.5%. No patient that underwent ostomy takedown without CE had a stricture diagnosed intraoperatively or an unrecognized stricture that presented clinically after stoma takedown. Conclusions: Routine CE is not required prior to small bowel ostomy reversal in infants. We recommend judicious use of enema studies in patients with NEC and high likelihood of stricture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1138-1141
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of pediatric surgery
Volume51
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

Ostomy
Enema
antineoplaston A10
Pathologic Constriction
Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Intestinal Atresia
Medical Records
Students
Costs and Cost Analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

@article{6e5754d6f93948e0b1f31cf4bea095ce,
title = "Routine contrast enema is not required for all infants prior to ostomy reversal: A 10-year single-center experience",
abstract = "Introduction: The incidence of intestinal stricture is low for most conditions requiring a primary small bowel stoma in infants. Routine performance of contrast enemas (CE) prior to stoma closure adds cost and radiation exposure. We hypothesized that routine CE prior to ostomy reversal is not necessary in all infants, and sought to identify a subset of patients who may benefit from preoperative CE. Methods: Medical records of infants under age 1 (N = 161) undergoing small bowel stoma reversal at a single institution between 2003 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Student's T-test was used to compare groups. Results: Contrast enemas were performed on 80{\%} of all infants undergoing small bowel ostomy reversal during the study period. Infants with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were more likely to have a CE than those with intestinal atresia (p = 0.03) or those with all other diagnoses combined (p = 0.03). Nine strictures were identified on CE. Of those, 8 (89{\%}) were in patients with NEC, and only 4 were clinically significant and required operative resection. The overall relevant stricture rate was 2.5{\%}. No patient that underwent ostomy takedown without CE had a stricture diagnosed intraoperatively or an unrecognized stricture that presented clinically after stoma takedown. Conclusions: Routine CE is not required prior to small bowel ostomy reversal in infants. We recommend judicious use of enema studies in patients with NEC and high likelihood of stricture.",
author = "Christa Grant and Golden, {Jamie M.} and Anselmo, {Dean M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.12.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "1138--1141",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "7",

}

Routine contrast enema is not required for all infants prior to ostomy reversal : A 10-year single-center experience. / Grant, Christa; Golden, Jamie M.; Anselmo, Dean M.

In: Journal of pediatric surgery, Vol. 51, No. 7, 01.07.2016, p. 1138-1141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Routine contrast enema is not required for all infants prior to ostomy reversal

T2 - A 10-year single-center experience

AU - Grant, Christa

AU - Golden, Jamie M.

AU - Anselmo, Dean M.

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Introduction: The incidence of intestinal stricture is low for most conditions requiring a primary small bowel stoma in infants. Routine performance of contrast enemas (CE) prior to stoma closure adds cost and radiation exposure. We hypothesized that routine CE prior to ostomy reversal is not necessary in all infants, and sought to identify a subset of patients who may benefit from preoperative CE. Methods: Medical records of infants under age 1 (N = 161) undergoing small bowel stoma reversal at a single institution between 2003 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Student's T-test was used to compare groups. Results: Contrast enemas were performed on 80% of all infants undergoing small bowel ostomy reversal during the study period. Infants with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were more likely to have a CE than those with intestinal atresia (p = 0.03) or those with all other diagnoses combined (p = 0.03). Nine strictures were identified on CE. Of those, 8 (89%) were in patients with NEC, and only 4 were clinically significant and required operative resection. The overall relevant stricture rate was 2.5%. No patient that underwent ostomy takedown without CE had a stricture diagnosed intraoperatively or an unrecognized stricture that presented clinically after stoma takedown. Conclusions: Routine CE is not required prior to small bowel ostomy reversal in infants. We recommend judicious use of enema studies in patients with NEC and high likelihood of stricture.

AB - Introduction: The incidence of intestinal stricture is low for most conditions requiring a primary small bowel stoma in infants. Routine performance of contrast enemas (CE) prior to stoma closure adds cost and radiation exposure. We hypothesized that routine CE prior to ostomy reversal is not necessary in all infants, and sought to identify a subset of patients who may benefit from preoperative CE. Methods: Medical records of infants under age 1 (N = 161) undergoing small bowel stoma reversal at a single institution between 2003 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Student's T-test was used to compare groups. Results: Contrast enemas were performed on 80% of all infants undergoing small bowel ostomy reversal during the study period. Infants with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were more likely to have a CE than those with intestinal atresia (p = 0.03) or those with all other diagnoses combined (p = 0.03). Nine strictures were identified on CE. Of those, 8 (89%) were in patients with NEC, and only 4 were clinically significant and required operative resection. The overall relevant stricture rate was 2.5%. No patient that underwent ostomy takedown without CE had a stricture diagnosed intraoperatively or an unrecognized stricture that presented clinically after stoma takedown. Conclusions: Routine CE is not required prior to small bowel ostomy reversal in infants. We recommend judicious use of enema studies in patients with NEC and high likelihood of stricture.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962059576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962059576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.12.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.12.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 26831533

AN - SCOPUS:84962059576

VL - 51

SP - 1138

EP - 1141

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

IS - 7

ER -