Routine drain placement in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: An expanded retrospective comparative study of 755 patients and review of the literature

Srinivas Kavuturu, Ann Rogers, Randy Haluck

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Routine drain use after laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is still practiced by many bariatric surgeons. After a patient in our program experienced intestinal obstruction secondary to a drain, we reevaluated our practice and hypothesized drains would be of no benefit and potentially harmful after LRYGB. Retrospective record review of all patients undergoing LRYGB from August 2005 to August 2009 was performed. As we changed our practice in December 2006, we have two comparable groups: one with a drain placed at surgery and one without. All operations were otherwise performed in an identical fashion by three fellowship-trained university surgeons. We compared outcomes between the two groups, particularly regarding gastrojejunal (GJ) leaks. Jejunojejunal (JJ) leaks, unlikely to be captured by these drains, were not studied. A total of 755 LRYGBs were performed during the study period, the first 272 patients with routine drains and the subsequent 483 without. Demographics were statistically similar between the two groups. There were four GJ leaks in the drain group (1.47%) and three in the nondrain group (0.62%). Among the drain patients, two required operation and two were treated nonoperatively. Among the nondrain patients, two required operation and one was treated nonoperatively. The leak and reoperation rates between the groups were not statistically different (p = 0.154 and p = 0.514). Routine drains likely have no benefit after LRYGB. Clinical parameters such as tachycardia, fever, oliguria, and increasing abdominal pain should guide further investigation for and treatment of a leak.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)177-181
Number of pages5
JournalObesity Surgery
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

Gastric Bypass
Retrospective Studies
Oliguria
Bariatrics
Intestinal Obstruction
Reoperation
Tachycardia
Abdominal Pain
Fever
Demography

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

@article{6264fc217874420e9b5313d9416ae6ec,
title = "Routine drain placement in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: An expanded retrospective comparative study of 755 patients and review of the literature",
abstract = "Routine drain use after laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is still practiced by many bariatric surgeons. After a patient in our program experienced intestinal obstruction secondary to a drain, we reevaluated our practice and hypothesized drains would be of no benefit and potentially harmful after LRYGB. Retrospective record review of all patients undergoing LRYGB from August 2005 to August 2009 was performed. As we changed our practice in December 2006, we have two comparable groups: one with a drain placed at surgery and one without. All operations were otherwise performed in an identical fashion by three fellowship-trained university surgeons. We compared outcomes between the two groups, particularly regarding gastrojejunal (GJ) leaks. Jejunojejunal (JJ) leaks, unlikely to be captured by these drains, were not studied. A total of 755 LRYGBs were performed during the study period, the first 272 patients with routine drains and the subsequent 483 without. Demographics were statistically similar between the two groups. There were four GJ leaks in the drain group (1.47{\%}) and three in the nondrain group (0.62{\%}). Among the drain patients, two required operation and two were treated nonoperatively. Among the nondrain patients, two required operation and one was treated nonoperatively. The leak and reoperation rates between the groups were not statistically different (p = 0.154 and p = 0.514). Routine drains likely have no benefit after LRYGB. Clinical parameters such as tachycardia, fever, oliguria, and increasing abdominal pain should guide further investigation for and treatment of a leak.",
author = "Srinivas Kavuturu and Ann Rogers and Randy Haluck",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11695-011-0560-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "177--181",
journal = "Obesity Surgery",
issn = "0960-8923",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

Routine drain placement in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass : An expanded retrospective comparative study of 755 patients and review of the literature. / Kavuturu, Srinivas; Rogers, Ann; Haluck, Randy.

In: Obesity Surgery, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 177-181.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Routine drain placement in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

T2 - An expanded retrospective comparative study of 755 patients and review of the literature

AU - Kavuturu, Srinivas

AU - Rogers, Ann

AU - Haluck, Randy

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Routine drain use after laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is still practiced by many bariatric surgeons. After a patient in our program experienced intestinal obstruction secondary to a drain, we reevaluated our practice and hypothesized drains would be of no benefit and potentially harmful after LRYGB. Retrospective record review of all patients undergoing LRYGB from August 2005 to August 2009 was performed. As we changed our practice in December 2006, we have two comparable groups: one with a drain placed at surgery and one without. All operations were otherwise performed in an identical fashion by three fellowship-trained university surgeons. We compared outcomes between the two groups, particularly regarding gastrojejunal (GJ) leaks. Jejunojejunal (JJ) leaks, unlikely to be captured by these drains, were not studied. A total of 755 LRYGBs were performed during the study period, the first 272 patients with routine drains and the subsequent 483 without. Demographics were statistically similar between the two groups. There were four GJ leaks in the drain group (1.47%) and three in the nondrain group (0.62%). Among the drain patients, two required operation and two were treated nonoperatively. Among the nondrain patients, two required operation and one was treated nonoperatively. The leak and reoperation rates between the groups were not statistically different (p = 0.154 and p = 0.514). Routine drains likely have no benefit after LRYGB. Clinical parameters such as tachycardia, fever, oliguria, and increasing abdominal pain should guide further investigation for and treatment of a leak.

AB - Routine drain use after laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is still practiced by many bariatric surgeons. After a patient in our program experienced intestinal obstruction secondary to a drain, we reevaluated our practice and hypothesized drains would be of no benefit and potentially harmful after LRYGB. Retrospective record review of all patients undergoing LRYGB from August 2005 to August 2009 was performed. As we changed our practice in December 2006, we have two comparable groups: one with a drain placed at surgery and one without. All operations were otherwise performed in an identical fashion by three fellowship-trained university surgeons. We compared outcomes between the two groups, particularly regarding gastrojejunal (GJ) leaks. Jejunojejunal (JJ) leaks, unlikely to be captured by these drains, were not studied. A total of 755 LRYGBs were performed during the study period, the first 272 patients with routine drains and the subsequent 483 without. Demographics were statistically similar between the two groups. There were four GJ leaks in the drain group (1.47%) and three in the nondrain group (0.62%). Among the drain patients, two required operation and two were treated nonoperatively. Among the nondrain patients, two required operation and one was treated nonoperatively. The leak and reoperation rates between the groups were not statistically different (p = 0.154 and p = 0.514). Routine drains likely have no benefit after LRYGB. Clinical parameters such as tachycardia, fever, oliguria, and increasing abdominal pain should guide further investigation for and treatment of a leak.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857359589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857359589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11695-011-0560-5

DO - 10.1007/s11695-011-0560-5

M3 - Review article

C2 - 22101852

AN - SCOPUS:84857359589

VL - 22

SP - 177

EP - 181

JO - Obesity Surgery

JF - Obesity Surgery

SN - 0960-8923

IS - 1

ER -