Ruminating about mental illness and creativity

Emily C. Nusbaum, Roger E. Beaty, Paul J. Silvia

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Ruminating about mental illness and creativity Although a popular one, the question of whether mental illness is good for creativity is not new. As Becker discusses in his chapter, the ancient Greeks were speculating about “madness” and how it relates to creative genius long before the Renaissance-era artists thought to paint portraits of Italian emperors as piles of twigs and gourds (see Giuseppe Arcimboldo, sixteenth century), or the Romanticists composed paintings of grown men eating babies (Francisco Goya – Saturn devouring his son, c.1819) and people biting one another to steal each other’s identities (William-Adolphe Bouguereau – Dante and Virgil in Hell, 1850). In fact, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle carried on a philosophical tradition of questioning the “divine madness” of inspiration. It was thought in ancient Greece that the greatness of poets and prophets was a gift bestowed upon people in an altered state of awareness by the gods (or demons, depending on whom we’re asking). Periodically since then, artists, poets, and philosophers were thought to be able to create because of divine demonic intervention, “melancholia,” disease, drug use, or the like. And we, as researchers, are left to sift through the madness (or lack thereof) in search of evidence that this relationship actually exists (or doesn’t). In this chapter, we offer some reflections – or ruminations, as befits the occasion – on creativity and mental illness. These ideas are abstracted from and inspired by this interesting batch of chapters. We’ll ponder a few topics: whether mental illness is specific to a few creative domains, why links exist when they are found, and what to take away from this large and sprawling literature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCreativity and Mental Illness
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages395-402
Number of pages8
ISBN (Electronic)9781139128902
ISBN (Print)9781107021693
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Creativity
Saturn
Gift Giving
Paintings
Paint
Greece
Depressive Disorder
Nuclear Family
Eating
Research Personnel
Pharmaceutical Preparations

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Nusbaum, E. C., Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2014). Ruminating about mental illness and creativity. In Creativity and Mental Illness (pp. 395-402). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139128902.025
Nusbaum, Emily C. ; Beaty, Roger E. ; Silvia, Paul J. / Ruminating about mental illness and creativity. Creativity and Mental Illness. Cambridge University Press, 2014. pp. 395-402
@inbook{4ea28c6feef44564aaf03aae2584afa0,
title = "Ruminating about mental illness and creativity",
abstract = "Ruminating about mental illness and creativity Although a popular one, the question of whether mental illness is good for creativity is not new. As Becker discusses in his chapter, the ancient Greeks were speculating about “madness” and how it relates to creative genius long before the Renaissance-era artists thought to paint portraits of Italian emperors as piles of twigs and gourds (see Giuseppe Arcimboldo, sixteenth century), or the Romanticists composed paintings of grown men eating babies (Francisco Goya – Saturn devouring his son, c.1819) and people biting one another to steal each other’s identities (William-Adolphe Bouguereau – Dante and Virgil in Hell, 1850). In fact, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle carried on a philosophical tradition of questioning the “divine madness” of inspiration. It was thought in ancient Greece that the greatness of poets and prophets was a gift bestowed upon people in an altered state of awareness by the gods (or demons, depending on whom we’re asking). Periodically since then, artists, poets, and philosophers were thought to be able to create because of divine demonic intervention, “melancholia,” disease, drug use, or the like. And we, as researchers, are left to sift through the madness (or lack thereof) in search of evidence that this relationship actually exists (or doesn’t). In this chapter, we offer some reflections – or ruminations, as befits the occasion – on creativity and mental illness. These ideas are abstracted from and inspired by this interesting batch of chapters. We’ll ponder a few topics: whether mental illness is specific to a few creative domains, why links exist when they are found, and what to take away from this large and sprawling literature.",
author = "Nusbaum, {Emily C.} and Beaty, {Roger E.} and Silvia, {Paul J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781139128902.025",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781107021693",
pages = "395--402",
booktitle = "Creativity and Mental Illness",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Nusbaum, EC, Beaty, RE & Silvia, PJ 2014, Ruminating about mental illness and creativity. in Creativity and Mental Illness. Cambridge University Press, pp. 395-402. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139128902.025

Ruminating about mental illness and creativity. / Nusbaum, Emily C.; Beaty, Roger E.; Silvia, Paul J.

Creativity and Mental Illness. Cambridge University Press, 2014. p. 395-402.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Ruminating about mental illness and creativity

AU - Nusbaum, Emily C.

AU - Beaty, Roger E.

AU - Silvia, Paul J.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Ruminating about mental illness and creativity Although a popular one, the question of whether mental illness is good for creativity is not new. As Becker discusses in his chapter, the ancient Greeks were speculating about “madness” and how it relates to creative genius long before the Renaissance-era artists thought to paint portraits of Italian emperors as piles of twigs and gourds (see Giuseppe Arcimboldo, sixteenth century), or the Romanticists composed paintings of grown men eating babies (Francisco Goya – Saturn devouring his son, c.1819) and people biting one another to steal each other’s identities (William-Adolphe Bouguereau – Dante and Virgil in Hell, 1850). In fact, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle carried on a philosophical tradition of questioning the “divine madness” of inspiration. It was thought in ancient Greece that the greatness of poets and prophets was a gift bestowed upon people in an altered state of awareness by the gods (or demons, depending on whom we’re asking). Periodically since then, artists, poets, and philosophers were thought to be able to create because of divine demonic intervention, “melancholia,” disease, drug use, or the like. And we, as researchers, are left to sift through the madness (or lack thereof) in search of evidence that this relationship actually exists (or doesn’t). In this chapter, we offer some reflections – or ruminations, as befits the occasion – on creativity and mental illness. These ideas are abstracted from and inspired by this interesting batch of chapters. We’ll ponder a few topics: whether mental illness is specific to a few creative domains, why links exist when they are found, and what to take away from this large and sprawling literature.

AB - Ruminating about mental illness and creativity Although a popular one, the question of whether mental illness is good for creativity is not new. As Becker discusses in his chapter, the ancient Greeks were speculating about “madness” and how it relates to creative genius long before the Renaissance-era artists thought to paint portraits of Italian emperors as piles of twigs and gourds (see Giuseppe Arcimboldo, sixteenth century), or the Romanticists composed paintings of grown men eating babies (Francisco Goya – Saturn devouring his son, c.1819) and people biting one another to steal each other’s identities (William-Adolphe Bouguereau – Dante and Virgil in Hell, 1850). In fact, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle carried on a philosophical tradition of questioning the “divine madness” of inspiration. It was thought in ancient Greece that the greatness of poets and prophets was a gift bestowed upon people in an altered state of awareness by the gods (or demons, depending on whom we’re asking). Periodically since then, artists, poets, and philosophers were thought to be able to create because of divine demonic intervention, “melancholia,” disease, drug use, or the like. And we, as researchers, are left to sift through the madness (or lack thereof) in search of evidence that this relationship actually exists (or doesn’t). In this chapter, we offer some reflections – or ruminations, as befits the occasion – on creativity and mental illness. These ideas are abstracted from and inspired by this interesting batch of chapters. We’ll ponder a few topics: whether mental illness is specific to a few creative domains, why links exist when they are found, and what to take away from this large and sprawling literature.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953743724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953743724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781139128902.025

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781139128902.025

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84953743724

SN - 9781107021693

SP - 395

EP - 402

BT - Creativity and Mental Illness

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Nusbaum EC, Beaty RE, Silvia PJ. Ruminating about mental illness and creativity. In Creativity and Mental Illness. Cambridge University Press. 2014. p. 395-402 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139128902.025