TY - JOUR
T1 - Salvage therapy for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
AU - Zaorsky, Nicholas G.
AU - Calais, Jeremie
AU - Fanti, Stefano
AU - Tilki, Derya
AU - Dorff, Tanya
AU - Spratt, Daniel E.
AU - Kishan, Amar U.
N1 - Funding Information:
N.G.Z. is supported by startup funding from Penn State Cancer Institute and Penn State College of Medicine, is supported by the National Institutes of Health Grant L radical prostatectomy 1 L30 CA231572-01, is supported by the American Cancer Society – Tri State CEOs Against Cancer Clinician Scientist Development Grant, CSDG-20-013-01-CCE and received remuneration from Springer Nature for his textbook, Absolute Clinical Radiation Oncology Review.
Funding Information:
J.C. is supported by the Prostate Cancer Foundation (2020 Young Investigator Award 20YOUN05, 2019 Challenge Award 19CHAL02), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular imaging (2019 Molecular Imaging Research Grant for Junior Academic Faculty) and reports prior consulting activities outside of the submitted work for Advanced Accelerator Applications, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Curium Pharma, GE Healthcare, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Radiomedix and Telix Pharmaceuticals. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - More than 40% of men with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer will experience a biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Clinical guidelines for the management of these patients largely focus on the use of salvage radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy. However, not all patients with biochemical recurrence will go on to develop metastases or die from their disease. The optimal pre-salvage therapy investigational workup for patients who experience biochemical recurrence should, therefore, include novel techniques such as PET imaging and genomic analysis of radical prostatectomy specimen tissue, as well as consideration of more traditional clinical variables such as PSA value, PSA kinetics, Gleason score and pathological stage of disease. In patients without metastatic disease, the only known curative intervention is salvage radiotherapy but, given the therapeutic burden of this treatment, importance must be placed on accurate timing of treatment, radiation dose, fractionation and field size. Systemic therapy also has a role in the salvage setting, both concurrently with radiotherapy and as salvage monotherapy.
AB - More than 40% of men with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer will experience a biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Clinical guidelines for the management of these patients largely focus on the use of salvage radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy. However, not all patients with biochemical recurrence will go on to develop metastases or die from their disease. The optimal pre-salvage therapy investigational workup for patients who experience biochemical recurrence should, therefore, include novel techniques such as PET imaging and genomic analysis of radical prostatectomy specimen tissue, as well as consideration of more traditional clinical variables such as PSA value, PSA kinetics, Gleason score and pathological stage of disease. In patients without metastatic disease, the only known curative intervention is salvage radiotherapy but, given the therapeutic burden of this treatment, importance must be placed on accurate timing of treatment, radiation dose, fractionation and field size. Systemic therapy also has a role in the salvage setting, both concurrently with radiotherapy and as salvage monotherapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112655542&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85112655542&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41585-021-00497-7
DO - 10.1038/s41585-021-00497-7
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34363040
AN - SCOPUS:85112655542
SN - 1759-4812
VL - 18
SP - 643
EP - 668
JO - Nature Reviews Urology
JF - Nature Reviews Urology
IS - 11
ER -