Scaffolding argumentation about water quality: a mixed-method study in a rural middle school

Brian Belland, Jiangyue Gu, Sara Armbrust, Brant Cook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A common way for students to develop scientific argumentation abilities is through argumentation about socioscientific issues, defined as scientific problems with social, ethical, and moral aspects. Computer-based scaffolding can support students in this process. In this mixed method study, we examined the use and impact of computer based scaffolding to support middle school students’ creation of evidence-based arguments during a 3-week problem-based learning unit focused on the water quality of a local river. We found a significant and substantial impact on the argument evaluation ability of lower-achieving students, and preliminary evidence of an impact on argument evaluation ability among low-SES students. We also found that students used the various available support—computer-based scaffolding, teacher scaffolding, and groupmate support—in different ways to counter differing challenges. We then formulated changes to the scaffolds on the basis of research results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)325-353
Number of pages29
JournalEducational Technology Research and Development
Volume63
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

rural school
argumentation
water
student
ability
evaluation
research results
evidence
river
teacher
learning

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

@article{8eef8ff28f7f48cf9e9c19204925e86c,
title = "Scaffolding argumentation about water quality: a mixed-method study in a rural middle school",
abstract = "A common way for students to develop scientific argumentation abilities is through argumentation about socioscientific issues, defined as scientific problems with social, ethical, and moral aspects. Computer-based scaffolding can support students in this process. In this mixed method study, we examined the use and impact of computer based scaffolding to support middle school students’ creation of evidence-based arguments during a 3-week problem-based learning unit focused on the water quality of a local river. We found a significant and substantial impact on the argument evaluation ability of lower-achieving students, and preliminary evidence of an impact on argument evaluation ability among low-SES students. We also found that students used the various available support—computer-based scaffolding, teacher scaffolding, and groupmate support—in different ways to counter differing challenges. We then formulated changes to the scaffolds on the basis of research results.",
author = "Brian Belland and Jiangyue Gu and Sara Armbrust and Brant Cook",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11423-015-9373-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "325--353",
journal = "Educational Technology Research and Development",
issn = "1042-1629",
publisher = "Springer Boston",
number = "3",

}

Scaffolding argumentation about water quality : a mixed-method study in a rural middle school. / Belland, Brian; Gu, Jiangyue; Armbrust, Sara; Cook, Brant.

In: Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 63, No. 3, 01.06.2015, p. 325-353.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scaffolding argumentation about water quality

T2 - a mixed-method study in a rural middle school

AU - Belland, Brian

AU - Gu, Jiangyue

AU - Armbrust, Sara

AU - Cook, Brant

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - A common way for students to develop scientific argumentation abilities is through argumentation about socioscientific issues, defined as scientific problems with social, ethical, and moral aspects. Computer-based scaffolding can support students in this process. In this mixed method study, we examined the use and impact of computer based scaffolding to support middle school students’ creation of evidence-based arguments during a 3-week problem-based learning unit focused on the water quality of a local river. We found a significant and substantial impact on the argument evaluation ability of lower-achieving students, and preliminary evidence of an impact on argument evaluation ability among low-SES students. We also found that students used the various available support—computer-based scaffolding, teacher scaffolding, and groupmate support—in different ways to counter differing challenges. We then formulated changes to the scaffolds on the basis of research results.

AB - A common way for students to develop scientific argumentation abilities is through argumentation about socioscientific issues, defined as scientific problems with social, ethical, and moral aspects. Computer-based scaffolding can support students in this process. In this mixed method study, we examined the use and impact of computer based scaffolding to support middle school students’ creation of evidence-based arguments during a 3-week problem-based learning unit focused on the water quality of a local river. We found a significant and substantial impact on the argument evaluation ability of lower-achieving students, and preliminary evidence of an impact on argument evaluation ability among low-SES students. We also found that students used the various available support—computer-based scaffolding, teacher scaffolding, and groupmate support—in different ways to counter differing challenges. We then formulated changes to the scaffolds on the basis of research results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939995286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939995286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11423-015-9373-x

DO - 10.1007/s11423-015-9373-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84939995286

VL - 63

SP - 325

EP - 353

JO - Educational Technology Research and Development

JF - Educational Technology Research and Development

SN - 1042-1629

IS - 3

ER -