Scaffolding Reflection and Articulation of Scientific Explanations in a Data-Rich, Project-Based Learning Environment: An Investigation of Progress Portfolio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, we examined how learners developed scientific explanations about light with the assistance of various technology-based seaffolds. The study emphasis was on scaffolding processes of reflection and articulation. We used a content-neutral software program (Progress Portfolio) to create the instructional scaffolds. A qualitative research design was used to investigate two pairs of prospective teachers in a science content course in engineering. Our findings suggested that the computer-based scaffolds used in our study were useful to support articulation, reflection, and revision of explanations, when certain conditions were met. A major theme of our findings relates to interacting effects among learner characteristics, teacher coaching, software scaffolding design, and task characteristics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-84
Number of pages20
JournalEducational Technology Research and Development
Volume51
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

learning environment
coaching
teacher
research planning
qualitative research
assistance
engineering
science
software

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

@article{de6a659baf7d45dea2abdf5160098939,
title = "Scaffolding Reflection and Articulation of Scientific Explanations in a Data-Rich, Project-Based Learning Environment: An Investigation of Progress Portfolio",
abstract = "In this study, we examined how learners developed scientific explanations about light with the assistance of various technology-based seaffolds. The study emphasis was on scaffolding processes of reflection and articulation. We used a content-neutral software program (Progress Portfolio) to create the instructional scaffolds. A qualitative research design was used to investigate two pairs of prospective teachers in a science content course in engineering. Our findings suggested that the computer-based scaffolds used in our study were useful to support articulation, reflection, and revision of explanations, when certain conditions were met. A major theme of our findings relates to interacting effects among learner characteristics, teacher coaching, software scaffolding design, and task characteristics.",
author = "Land, {Susan Mary} and Carla Zembal-Saul",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF02504544",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "65--84",
journal = "Educational Technology Research and Development",
issn = "1042-1629",
publisher = "Springer Boston",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scaffolding Reflection and Articulation of Scientific Explanations in a Data-Rich, Project-Based Learning Environment

T2 - An Investigation of Progress Portfolio

AU - Land, Susan Mary

AU - Zembal-Saul, Carla

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - In this study, we examined how learners developed scientific explanations about light with the assistance of various technology-based seaffolds. The study emphasis was on scaffolding processes of reflection and articulation. We used a content-neutral software program (Progress Portfolio) to create the instructional scaffolds. A qualitative research design was used to investigate two pairs of prospective teachers in a science content course in engineering. Our findings suggested that the computer-based scaffolds used in our study were useful to support articulation, reflection, and revision of explanations, when certain conditions were met. A major theme of our findings relates to interacting effects among learner characteristics, teacher coaching, software scaffolding design, and task characteristics.

AB - In this study, we examined how learners developed scientific explanations about light with the assistance of various technology-based seaffolds. The study emphasis was on scaffolding processes of reflection and articulation. We used a content-neutral software program (Progress Portfolio) to create the instructional scaffolds. A qualitative research design was used to investigate two pairs of prospective teachers in a science content course in engineering. Our findings suggested that the computer-based scaffolds used in our study were useful to support articulation, reflection, and revision of explanations, when certain conditions were met. A major theme of our findings relates to interacting effects among learner characteristics, teacher coaching, software scaffolding design, and task characteristics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1142289755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1142289755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02504544

DO - 10.1007/BF02504544

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:1142289755

VL - 51

SP - 65

EP - 84

JO - Educational Technology Research and Development

JF - Educational Technology Research and Development

SN - 1042-1629

IS - 4

ER -