Second stage of labor and epidural use: A larger effect than previously suggested

Yvonne W. Cheng, Brian L. Shaffer, James Nicholson, Aaron B. Caughey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:: To examine the length of second stage of labor with and without an epidural during labor. METHODS:: This was a retrospective cohort study of 42,268 women who delivered vaginally with normal neonatal outcomes. Median lengths and 95th percentiles of second stage of labor were compared by epidural use with stratification by parity. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS:: Compared with women without epidural use, the 95th percentile length of second stage for nulliparous women was 197 minutes without epidural and 336 minutes with epidural (P<.001), a difference of 2 hours and 19 minutes. For multiparous women, the 95th percentile length of second stage was 81 minutes without epidural and 255 minutes with epidural (P<.001), a difference of 2 hours and 54 minutes. CONCLUSION:: Although recommendations for intervention during the second stage of labor have been made based on a 1-hour difference in the setting of epidural use, it appears that the 95th percentile duration is actually more than 2 hours longer with epidural during labor for both nulliparous and multiparous women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: II

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)527-535
Number of pages9
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume123
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 7 2014

Fingerprint

Second Labor Stage
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Survival Analysis
Parity
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Cheng, Yvonne W. ; Shaffer, Brian L. ; Nicholson, James ; Caughey, Aaron B. / Second stage of labor and epidural use : A larger effect than previously suggested. In: Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014 ; Vol. 123, No. 3. pp. 527-535.
@article{ee4adc42abb745169b87c03f1c1a0fee,
title = "Second stage of labor and epidural use: A larger effect than previously suggested",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE:: To examine the length of second stage of labor with and without an epidural during labor. METHODS:: This was a retrospective cohort study of 42,268 women who delivered vaginally with normal neonatal outcomes. Median lengths and 95th percentiles of second stage of labor were compared by epidural use with stratification by parity. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS:: Compared with women without epidural use, the 95th percentile length of second stage for nulliparous women was 197 minutes without epidural and 336 minutes with epidural (P<.001), a difference of 2 hours and 19 minutes. For multiparous women, the 95th percentile length of second stage was 81 minutes without epidural and 255 minutes with epidural (P<.001), a difference of 2 hours and 54 minutes. CONCLUSION:: Although recommendations for intervention during the second stage of labor have been made based on a 1-hour difference in the setting of epidural use, it appears that the 95th percentile duration is actually more than 2 hours longer with epidural during labor for both nulliparous and multiparous women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: II",
author = "Cheng, {Yvonne W.} and Shaffer, {Brian L.} and James Nicholson and Caughey, {Aaron B.}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1097/AOG.0000000000000134",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "123",
pages = "527--535",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

Second stage of labor and epidural use : A larger effect than previously suggested. / Cheng, Yvonne W.; Shaffer, Brian L.; Nicholson, James; Caughey, Aaron B.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 123, No. 3, 07.02.2014, p. 527-535.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Second stage of labor and epidural use

T2 - A larger effect than previously suggested

AU - Cheng, Yvonne W.

AU - Shaffer, Brian L.

AU - Nicholson, James

AU - Caughey, Aaron B.

PY - 2014/2/7

Y1 - 2014/2/7

N2 - OBJECTIVE:: To examine the length of second stage of labor with and without an epidural during labor. METHODS:: This was a retrospective cohort study of 42,268 women who delivered vaginally with normal neonatal outcomes. Median lengths and 95th percentiles of second stage of labor were compared by epidural use with stratification by parity. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS:: Compared with women without epidural use, the 95th percentile length of second stage for nulliparous women was 197 minutes without epidural and 336 minutes with epidural (P<.001), a difference of 2 hours and 19 minutes. For multiparous women, the 95th percentile length of second stage was 81 minutes without epidural and 255 minutes with epidural (P<.001), a difference of 2 hours and 54 minutes. CONCLUSION:: Although recommendations for intervention during the second stage of labor have been made based on a 1-hour difference in the setting of epidural use, it appears that the 95th percentile duration is actually more than 2 hours longer with epidural during labor for both nulliparous and multiparous women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: II

AB - OBJECTIVE:: To examine the length of second stage of labor with and without an epidural during labor. METHODS:: This was a retrospective cohort study of 42,268 women who delivered vaginally with normal neonatal outcomes. Median lengths and 95th percentiles of second stage of labor were compared by epidural use with stratification by parity. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS:: Compared with women without epidural use, the 95th percentile length of second stage for nulliparous women was 197 minutes without epidural and 336 minutes with epidural (P<.001), a difference of 2 hours and 19 minutes. For multiparous women, the 95th percentile length of second stage was 81 minutes without epidural and 255 minutes with epidural (P<.001), a difference of 2 hours and 54 minutes. CONCLUSION:: Although recommendations for intervention during the second stage of labor have been made based on a 1-hour difference in the setting of epidural use, it appears that the 95th percentile duration is actually more than 2 hours longer with epidural during labor for both nulliparous and multiparous women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: II

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894418763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894418763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000134

DO - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000134

M3 - Article

C2 - 24499753

AN - SCOPUS:84894418763

VL - 123

SP - 527

EP - 535

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 3

ER -