Secondary casualty information: Casualty uncertainty, female casualties, and wartime support

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

I develop a theory of wartime public opinion that identifies different types of casualty information and the varied roles they play. These roles include Primary Casualty Information (e.g., monthly casualties), which directly influences opinion; Contextual Casualty Information (e.g., enemy casualties), which mitigates the effect of primary casualties; and two new concepts, Casualty Uncertainty, the inability of individuals to infer casualty patterns, and Secondary Casualty Information, which represents alternative cost information. I theorize that when casualty uncertainty is low, and casualty patterns are clear, individuals rely on primary casualty information for evaluating a conflict. As uncertainty increases, however, and the picture painted by primary casualty data becomes increasingly opaque, individuals employ secondary casualty information to evaluate costs. I use the reporting of female casualties to represent an example of secondary casualty information. If casualty uncertainty is low, I anticipate that the existence of female casualties should have little influence on public attitudes. If casualty uncertainty is high, however, the reporting of female casualties will exert a negative effect on public support of the conflict. An experimental study finds strong support for these arguments. I examine how the results contribute to our understanding of wartime public support, women in combat, and the Iraq War.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)98-111
Number of pages14
JournalConflict Management and Peace Science
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2008

Fingerprint

uncertainty
public support
Uncertainty
Casualties
role play
costs
Iraq
public opinion

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{a5c7f020af3e466d8b562b77eb255769,
title = "Secondary casualty information: Casualty uncertainty, female casualties, and wartime support",
abstract = "I develop a theory of wartime public opinion that identifies different types of casualty information and the varied roles they play. These roles include Primary Casualty Information (e.g., monthly casualties), which directly influences opinion; Contextual Casualty Information (e.g., enemy casualties), which mitigates the effect of primary casualties; and two new concepts, Casualty Uncertainty, the inability of individuals to infer casualty patterns, and Secondary Casualty Information, which represents alternative cost information. I theorize that when casualty uncertainty is low, and casualty patterns are clear, individuals rely on primary casualty information for evaluating a conflict. As uncertainty increases, however, and the picture painted by primary casualty data becomes increasingly opaque, individuals employ secondary casualty information to evaluate costs. I use the reporting of female casualties to represent an example of secondary casualty information. If casualty uncertainty is low, I anticipate that the existence of female casualties should have little influence on public attitudes. If casualty uncertainty is high, however, the reporting of female casualties will exert a negative effect on public support of the conflict. An experimental study finds strong support for these arguments. I examine how the results contribute to our understanding of wartime public support, women in combat, and the Iraq War.",
author = "Gartner, {Scott Sigmund}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/07388940802007215",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "98--111",
journal = "Conflict Management and Peace Science",
issn = "0738-8942",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Secondary casualty information

T2 - Casualty uncertainty, female casualties, and wartime support

AU - Gartner, Scott Sigmund

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - I develop a theory of wartime public opinion that identifies different types of casualty information and the varied roles they play. These roles include Primary Casualty Information (e.g., monthly casualties), which directly influences opinion; Contextual Casualty Information (e.g., enemy casualties), which mitigates the effect of primary casualties; and two new concepts, Casualty Uncertainty, the inability of individuals to infer casualty patterns, and Secondary Casualty Information, which represents alternative cost information. I theorize that when casualty uncertainty is low, and casualty patterns are clear, individuals rely on primary casualty information for evaluating a conflict. As uncertainty increases, however, and the picture painted by primary casualty data becomes increasingly opaque, individuals employ secondary casualty information to evaluate costs. I use the reporting of female casualties to represent an example of secondary casualty information. If casualty uncertainty is low, I anticipate that the existence of female casualties should have little influence on public attitudes. If casualty uncertainty is high, however, the reporting of female casualties will exert a negative effect on public support of the conflict. An experimental study finds strong support for these arguments. I examine how the results contribute to our understanding of wartime public support, women in combat, and the Iraq War.

AB - I develop a theory of wartime public opinion that identifies different types of casualty information and the varied roles they play. These roles include Primary Casualty Information (e.g., monthly casualties), which directly influences opinion; Contextual Casualty Information (e.g., enemy casualties), which mitigates the effect of primary casualties; and two new concepts, Casualty Uncertainty, the inability of individuals to infer casualty patterns, and Secondary Casualty Information, which represents alternative cost information. I theorize that when casualty uncertainty is low, and casualty patterns are clear, individuals rely on primary casualty information for evaluating a conflict. As uncertainty increases, however, and the picture painted by primary casualty data becomes increasingly opaque, individuals employ secondary casualty information to evaluate costs. I use the reporting of female casualties to represent an example of secondary casualty information. If casualty uncertainty is low, I anticipate that the existence of female casualties should have little influence on public attitudes. If casualty uncertainty is high, however, the reporting of female casualties will exert a negative effect on public support of the conflict. An experimental study finds strong support for these arguments. I examine how the results contribute to our understanding of wartime public support, women in combat, and the Iraq War.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45949088069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45949088069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07388940802007215

DO - 10.1080/07388940802007215

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:45949088069

VL - 25

SP - 98

EP - 111

JO - Conflict Management and Peace Science

JF - Conflict Management and Peace Science

SN - 0738-8942

IS - 2

ER -