Seismic response of stainless steel braced frames

L. DiSarno, Amr S. Elnashai, D. A. Nethercot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present paper investigates the feasibility of the application of stainless steel (SS) in the seismic design of braced frames, either concentrically (CBFs) or eccentrically (EBFs) braced. A sample of regular multi-storey CBFs and EBFs was designed in compliance with modern seismic standards based on capacity-design rules. The results of pushover and inelastic response history analyses demonstrate that systems employing SSs exhibit enhanced plastic deformations and excellent energy absorbing capacity with respect to mild steel braced frames. The augmented strain hardening of SS, which is nearly twice that of carbon steels, is beneficial to prevent local buckling in steel members, especially those subjected to high axial compression. The performed analyses also demonstrate that in CBFs with SS braces and columns the increase in overstrength is about 40% with respect to the configuration in mild steel. For EBFs, the use of SS in the diagonals or in braces and links increases the global overstrength of the lateral resisting system by 20%. When the EBFs employ braces and columns in SS the increase can be as high as 50%.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)914-925
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Constructional Steel Research
Volume64
Issue number7-8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2008

Fingerprint

Stainless Steel
Seismic response
Stainless steel
Carbon steel
Axial compression
Seismic design
Steel
Strain hardening
Buckling
Plastic deformation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Metals and Alloys

Cite this

DiSarno, L. ; Elnashai, Amr S. ; Nethercot, D. A. / Seismic response of stainless steel braced frames. In: Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2008 ; Vol. 64, No. 7-8. pp. 914-925.
@article{3ea9457ea9a147eaaf2ad2cdd879cf84,
title = "Seismic response of stainless steel braced frames",
abstract = "The present paper investigates the feasibility of the application of stainless steel (SS) in the seismic design of braced frames, either concentrically (CBFs) or eccentrically (EBFs) braced. A sample of regular multi-storey CBFs and EBFs was designed in compliance with modern seismic standards based on capacity-design rules. The results of pushover and inelastic response history analyses demonstrate that systems employing SSs exhibit enhanced plastic deformations and excellent energy absorbing capacity with respect to mild steel braced frames. The augmented strain hardening of SS, which is nearly twice that of carbon steels, is beneficial to prevent local buckling in steel members, especially those subjected to high axial compression. The performed analyses also demonstrate that in CBFs with SS braces and columns the increase in overstrength is about 40{\%} with respect to the configuration in mild steel. For EBFs, the use of SS in the diagonals or in braces and links increases the global overstrength of the lateral resisting system by 20{\%}. When the EBFs employ braces and columns in SS the increase can be as high as 50{\%}.",
author = "L. DiSarno and Elnashai, {Amr S.} and Nethercot, {D. A.}",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.01.027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "914--925",
journal = "Journal of Constructional Steel Research",
issn = "0143-974X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "7-8",

}

Seismic response of stainless steel braced frames. / DiSarno, L.; Elnashai, Amr S.; Nethercot, D. A.

In: Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 64, No. 7-8, 01.07.2008, p. 914-925.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seismic response of stainless steel braced frames

AU - DiSarno, L.

AU - Elnashai, Amr S.

AU - Nethercot, D. A.

PY - 2008/7/1

Y1 - 2008/7/1

N2 - The present paper investigates the feasibility of the application of stainless steel (SS) in the seismic design of braced frames, either concentrically (CBFs) or eccentrically (EBFs) braced. A sample of regular multi-storey CBFs and EBFs was designed in compliance with modern seismic standards based on capacity-design rules. The results of pushover and inelastic response history analyses demonstrate that systems employing SSs exhibit enhanced plastic deformations and excellent energy absorbing capacity with respect to mild steel braced frames. The augmented strain hardening of SS, which is nearly twice that of carbon steels, is beneficial to prevent local buckling in steel members, especially those subjected to high axial compression. The performed analyses also demonstrate that in CBFs with SS braces and columns the increase in overstrength is about 40% with respect to the configuration in mild steel. For EBFs, the use of SS in the diagonals or in braces and links increases the global overstrength of the lateral resisting system by 20%. When the EBFs employ braces and columns in SS the increase can be as high as 50%.

AB - The present paper investigates the feasibility of the application of stainless steel (SS) in the seismic design of braced frames, either concentrically (CBFs) or eccentrically (EBFs) braced. A sample of regular multi-storey CBFs and EBFs was designed in compliance with modern seismic standards based on capacity-design rules. The results of pushover and inelastic response history analyses demonstrate that systems employing SSs exhibit enhanced plastic deformations and excellent energy absorbing capacity with respect to mild steel braced frames. The augmented strain hardening of SS, which is nearly twice that of carbon steels, is beneficial to prevent local buckling in steel members, especially those subjected to high axial compression. The performed analyses also demonstrate that in CBFs with SS braces and columns the increase in overstrength is about 40% with respect to the configuration in mild steel. For EBFs, the use of SS in the diagonals or in braces and links increases the global overstrength of the lateral resisting system by 20%. When the EBFs employ braces and columns in SS the increase can be as high as 50%.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42749085048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42749085048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.01.027

DO - 10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.01.027

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 914

EP - 925

JO - Journal of Constructional Steel Research

JF - Journal of Constructional Steel Research

SN - 0143-974X

IS - 7-8

ER -