Selection of a water-extractable phosphorus test for manures and biosolids as an indicator of runoff loss potential

Peter Kleinman, Dan Sullivan, Ann Wolf, Robin Brandt, Zhengxia Dou, Herschel Elliott, John Kovar, April Leytem, Rory Maguire, Philip Moore, Lou Saporito, Andrew Sharpley, Amy Shober, Tom Sims, John Toth, Gurpal Toor, Hailin Zhang, Tiequan Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The correlation of runoff phosphorus (P) with water-extractable phosphorus (WEP) in land-applied manures and biosolids has spurred wide use of WEP as a water quality indicator. Land managers, planners, and researchers need a common WEP protocol to consistently use WEP in nutrient management. Our objectives were to (i) identify a common WEP protocol with sufficient accuracy and precision to be adopted by commercial testing laboratories and (ii) confirm that the common protocol is a reliable index of runoff P. Ten laboratories across North America evaluated alternative protocols with an array of manure and biosolids samples. A single laboratory analyzed all samples and conducted a separate runoff study with the manures and biosolids. Extraction ratio (solution:solids) was the most important factor affecting WEP, with WEP increasing from 10:1 to 100:1 and increasing from 100:1 to 200:1. When WEP was measured by a single laboratory, correlations with runoff P from packed soil boxes amended with manure and biosolids ranged from 0.79 to 0.92 across all protocol combinations (extraction ratio, filtration method, and P determination method). Correlations with P in runoff were slightly lower but significant when WEP was measured by the 10 labs (r = 0.56-0.86). Based on laboratory repeatability and water quality evaluation criteria, we recommend the following common protocol: 100:1 extraction ratio; 1-h shaking and centrifuge 10 min at 1500 x g (filter with Whatman #1 paper if necessary); and determining P by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry or colorimetric methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1357-1367
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Environmental Quality
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2007

Fingerprint

Biosolids
Manures
biosolid
Runoff
Phosphorus
manure
runoff
phosphorus
Water
water
Water quality
test
loss
indicator
water quality
Centrifuges
Inductively coupled plasma
centrifuge
solid solution
Spectrometry

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Kleinman, Peter ; Sullivan, Dan ; Wolf, Ann ; Brandt, Robin ; Dou, Zhengxia ; Elliott, Herschel ; Kovar, John ; Leytem, April ; Maguire, Rory ; Moore, Philip ; Saporito, Lou ; Sharpley, Andrew ; Shober, Amy ; Sims, Tom ; Toth, John ; Toor, Gurpal ; Zhang, Hailin ; Zhang, Tiequan. / Selection of a water-extractable phosphorus test for manures and biosolids as an indicator of runoff loss potential. In: Journal of Environmental Quality. 2007 ; Vol. 36, No. 5. pp. 1357-1367.
@article{d1a4fc2ef44c436d9e39cc0b86e81074,
title = "Selection of a water-extractable phosphorus test for manures and biosolids as an indicator of runoff loss potential",
abstract = "The correlation of runoff phosphorus (P) with water-extractable phosphorus (WEP) in land-applied manures and biosolids has spurred wide use of WEP as a water quality indicator. Land managers, planners, and researchers need a common WEP protocol to consistently use WEP in nutrient management. Our objectives were to (i) identify a common WEP protocol with sufficient accuracy and precision to be adopted by commercial testing laboratories and (ii) confirm that the common protocol is a reliable index of runoff P. Ten laboratories across North America evaluated alternative protocols with an array of manure and biosolids samples. A single laboratory analyzed all samples and conducted a separate runoff study with the manures and biosolids. Extraction ratio (solution:solids) was the most important factor affecting WEP, with WEP increasing from 10:1 to 100:1 and increasing from 100:1 to 200:1. When WEP was measured by a single laboratory, correlations with runoff P from packed soil boxes amended with manure and biosolids ranged from 0.79 to 0.92 across all protocol combinations (extraction ratio, filtration method, and P determination method). Correlations with P in runoff were slightly lower but significant when WEP was measured by the 10 labs (r = 0.56-0.86). Based on laboratory repeatability and water quality evaluation criteria, we recommend the following common protocol: 100:1 extraction ratio; 1-h shaking and centrifuge 10 min at 1500 x g (filter with Whatman #1 paper if necessary); and determining P by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry or colorimetric methods.",
author = "Peter Kleinman and Dan Sullivan and Ann Wolf and Robin Brandt and Zhengxia Dou and Herschel Elliott and John Kovar and April Leytem and Rory Maguire and Philip Moore and Lou Saporito and Andrew Sharpley and Amy Shober and Tom Sims and John Toth and Gurpal Toor and Hailin Zhang and Tiequan Zhang",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2134/jeq2006.0450",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "1357--1367",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Quality",
issn = "0047-2425",
publisher = "ASA/CSSA/SSSA",
number = "5",

}

Kleinman, P, Sullivan, D, Wolf, A, Brandt, R, Dou, Z, Elliott, H, Kovar, J, Leytem, A, Maguire, R, Moore, P, Saporito, L, Sharpley, A, Shober, A, Sims, T, Toth, J, Toor, G, Zhang, H & Zhang, T 2007, 'Selection of a water-extractable phosphorus test for manures and biosolids as an indicator of runoff loss potential', Journal of Environmental Quality, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1357-1367. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0450

Selection of a water-extractable phosphorus test for manures and biosolids as an indicator of runoff loss potential. / Kleinman, Peter; Sullivan, Dan; Wolf, Ann; Brandt, Robin; Dou, Zhengxia; Elliott, Herschel; Kovar, John; Leytem, April; Maguire, Rory; Moore, Philip; Saporito, Lou; Sharpley, Andrew; Shober, Amy; Sims, Tom; Toth, John; Toor, Gurpal; Zhang, Hailin; Zhang, Tiequan.

In: Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol. 36, No. 5, 01.09.2007, p. 1357-1367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selection of a water-extractable phosphorus test for manures and biosolids as an indicator of runoff loss potential

AU - Kleinman, Peter

AU - Sullivan, Dan

AU - Wolf, Ann

AU - Brandt, Robin

AU - Dou, Zhengxia

AU - Elliott, Herschel

AU - Kovar, John

AU - Leytem, April

AU - Maguire, Rory

AU - Moore, Philip

AU - Saporito, Lou

AU - Sharpley, Andrew

AU - Shober, Amy

AU - Sims, Tom

AU - Toth, John

AU - Toor, Gurpal

AU - Zhang, Hailin

AU - Zhang, Tiequan

PY - 2007/9/1

Y1 - 2007/9/1

N2 - The correlation of runoff phosphorus (P) with water-extractable phosphorus (WEP) in land-applied manures and biosolids has spurred wide use of WEP as a water quality indicator. Land managers, planners, and researchers need a common WEP protocol to consistently use WEP in nutrient management. Our objectives were to (i) identify a common WEP protocol with sufficient accuracy and precision to be adopted by commercial testing laboratories and (ii) confirm that the common protocol is a reliable index of runoff P. Ten laboratories across North America evaluated alternative protocols with an array of manure and biosolids samples. A single laboratory analyzed all samples and conducted a separate runoff study with the manures and biosolids. Extraction ratio (solution:solids) was the most important factor affecting WEP, with WEP increasing from 10:1 to 100:1 and increasing from 100:1 to 200:1. When WEP was measured by a single laboratory, correlations with runoff P from packed soil boxes amended with manure and biosolids ranged from 0.79 to 0.92 across all protocol combinations (extraction ratio, filtration method, and P determination method). Correlations with P in runoff were slightly lower but significant when WEP was measured by the 10 labs (r = 0.56-0.86). Based on laboratory repeatability and water quality evaluation criteria, we recommend the following common protocol: 100:1 extraction ratio; 1-h shaking and centrifuge 10 min at 1500 x g (filter with Whatman #1 paper if necessary); and determining P by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry or colorimetric methods.

AB - The correlation of runoff phosphorus (P) with water-extractable phosphorus (WEP) in land-applied manures and biosolids has spurred wide use of WEP as a water quality indicator. Land managers, planners, and researchers need a common WEP protocol to consistently use WEP in nutrient management. Our objectives were to (i) identify a common WEP protocol with sufficient accuracy and precision to be adopted by commercial testing laboratories and (ii) confirm that the common protocol is a reliable index of runoff P. Ten laboratories across North America evaluated alternative protocols with an array of manure and biosolids samples. A single laboratory analyzed all samples and conducted a separate runoff study with the manures and biosolids. Extraction ratio (solution:solids) was the most important factor affecting WEP, with WEP increasing from 10:1 to 100:1 and increasing from 100:1 to 200:1. When WEP was measured by a single laboratory, correlations with runoff P from packed soil boxes amended with manure and biosolids ranged from 0.79 to 0.92 across all protocol combinations (extraction ratio, filtration method, and P determination method). Correlations with P in runoff were slightly lower but significant when WEP was measured by the 10 labs (r = 0.56-0.86). Based on laboratory repeatability and water quality evaluation criteria, we recommend the following common protocol: 100:1 extraction ratio; 1-h shaking and centrifuge 10 min at 1500 x g (filter with Whatman #1 paper if necessary); and determining P by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry or colorimetric methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548765039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548765039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2134/jeq2006.0450

DO - 10.2134/jeq2006.0450

M3 - Article

C2 - 17636298

AN - SCOPUS:34548765039

VL - 36

SP - 1357

EP - 1367

JO - Journal of Environmental Quality

JF - Journal of Environmental Quality

SN - 0047-2425

IS - 5

ER -