Self- determination and ideality in hegel’s logic of being

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Hegel’s Science of Logic proposes to begin with no determinate, presupposed contentwhatsoever, and then, purely by dint of a methodically controlled reflection on the ‘movement’ of thinking itself, to generate a demonstrably complete list of categories and forms of thought. Like other of his contemporaries, Hegel regarded Kant as having neglected to provide a derivation of the categories he identified as constituting the structure of objectively valid experience (cp. SL 21.48/41, 12.44/541). The Science of Logic is intended to provide such a derivation and, in doing so, to improve upon similar attempts by Hegel’s predecessors, especially Fichte and Schelling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Hegel
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages219-241
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)9780199355228
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Georg W.F. Hegel
Self-determination
Logic
Controlled
Immanuel Kant
Thought
Johann Gottlieb Fichte

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Bowman, Brady Lee. / Self- determination and ideality in hegel’s logic of being. The Oxford Handbook of Hegel. Oxford University Press, 2017. pp. 219-241
@inbook{26e6f427a1c643ae9101d44f3b173c31,
title = "Self- determination and ideality in hegel’s logic of being",
abstract = "Hegel’s Science of Logic proposes to begin with no determinate, presupposed contentwhatsoever, and then, purely by dint of a methodically controlled reflection on the ‘movement’ of thinking itself, to generate a demonstrably complete list of categories and forms of thought. Like other of his contemporaries, Hegel regarded Kant as having neglected to provide a derivation of the categories he identified as constituting the structure of objectively valid experience (cp. SL 21.48/41, 12.44/541). The Science of Logic is intended to provide such a derivation and, in doing so, to improve upon similar attempts by Hegel’s predecessors, especially Fichte and Schelling.",
author = "Bowman, {Brady Lee}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199355228.013.11",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "219--241",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Hegel",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Self- determination and ideality in hegel’s logic of being. / Bowman, Brady Lee.

The Oxford Handbook of Hegel. Oxford University Press, 2017. p. 219-241.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Self- determination and ideality in hegel’s logic of being

AU - Bowman, Brady Lee

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Hegel’s Science of Logic proposes to begin with no determinate, presupposed contentwhatsoever, and then, purely by dint of a methodically controlled reflection on the ‘movement’ of thinking itself, to generate a demonstrably complete list of categories and forms of thought. Like other of his contemporaries, Hegel regarded Kant as having neglected to provide a derivation of the categories he identified as constituting the structure of objectively valid experience (cp. SL 21.48/41, 12.44/541). The Science of Logic is intended to provide such a derivation and, in doing so, to improve upon similar attempts by Hegel’s predecessors, especially Fichte and Schelling.

AB - Hegel’s Science of Logic proposes to begin with no determinate, presupposed contentwhatsoever, and then, purely by dint of a methodically controlled reflection on the ‘movement’ of thinking itself, to generate a demonstrably complete list of categories and forms of thought. Like other of his contemporaries, Hegel regarded Kant as having neglected to provide a derivation of the categories he identified as constituting the structure of objectively valid experience (cp. SL 21.48/41, 12.44/541). The Science of Logic is intended to provide such a derivation and, in doing so, to improve upon similar attempts by Hegel’s predecessors, especially Fichte and Schelling.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060819580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060819580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199355228.013.11

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199355228.013.11

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85060819580

SP - 219

EP - 241

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Hegel

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -