Self-Handicapping, Expected Evaluation, and Performance

Accentuating the Positive and Attenuating the Negative

Lawrence J. Sanna, Melvin Michael Mark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three studies investigated the influence of social- and self-evaluative motives on self-handicapping and performance. In each study, efficacy expectancies were manipulated by varying the difficulty of a preliminary task, and social- and self-evaluation were manipulated orthogonally. In Study 1, participants who self-handicapped performed better than those who did not when a positive or negative evaluation was expected, in some conditions. In Study 2, we used a situationally imposed handicap and found that both social- and self-evaluation participants showed improved performance in the presence of the handicap. In Study 3, when a positive or negative evaluation was expected, high self-handicappers performed better after choosing to self-handicap, for both social- and self-evaluative motives. Little evidence of self-handicapping or effects on subsequent performance was found for low self-handicappers. No evidence was found for self-handicapping among participants who could not be evaluated. Discussion centers around motives to self-handicap and implications for subsequent performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)84-102
Number of pages19
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume64
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

Fingerprint

Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Disabled Persons
Evaluation
Handicap
Social evaluation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

@article{1f4d3415cd9a4955adcd1e65cc0af5c4,
title = "Self-Handicapping, Expected Evaluation, and Performance: Accentuating the Positive and Attenuating the Negative",
abstract = "Three studies investigated the influence of social- and self-evaluative motives on self-handicapping and performance. In each study, efficacy expectancies were manipulated by varying the difficulty of a preliminary task, and social- and self-evaluation were manipulated orthogonally. In Study 1, participants who self-handicapped performed better than those who did not when a positive or negative evaluation was expected, in some conditions. In Study 2, we used a situationally imposed handicap and found that both social- and self-evaluation participants showed improved performance in the presence of the handicap. In Study 3, when a positive or negative evaluation was expected, high self-handicappers performed better after choosing to self-handicap, for both social- and self-evaluative motives. Little evidence of self-handicapping or effects on subsequent performance was found for low self-handicappers. No evidence was found for self-handicapping among participants who could not be evaluated. Discussion centers around motives to self-handicap and implications for subsequent performance.",
author = "Sanna, {Lawrence J.} and Mark, {Melvin Michael}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1006/obhd.1995.1092",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "84--102",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-Handicapping, Expected Evaluation, and Performance

T2 - Accentuating the Positive and Attenuating the Negative

AU - Sanna, Lawrence J.

AU - Mark, Melvin Michael

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - Three studies investigated the influence of social- and self-evaluative motives on self-handicapping and performance. In each study, efficacy expectancies were manipulated by varying the difficulty of a preliminary task, and social- and self-evaluation were manipulated orthogonally. In Study 1, participants who self-handicapped performed better than those who did not when a positive or negative evaluation was expected, in some conditions. In Study 2, we used a situationally imposed handicap and found that both social- and self-evaluation participants showed improved performance in the presence of the handicap. In Study 3, when a positive or negative evaluation was expected, high self-handicappers performed better after choosing to self-handicap, for both social- and self-evaluative motives. Little evidence of self-handicapping or effects on subsequent performance was found for low self-handicappers. No evidence was found for self-handicapping among participants who could not be evaluated. Discussion centers around motives to self-handicap and implications for subsequent performance.

AB - Three studies investigated the influence of social- and self-evaluative motives on self-handicapping and performance. In each study, efficacy expectancies were manipulated by varying the difficulty of a preliminary task, and social- and self-evaluation were manipulated orthogonally. In Study 1, participants who self-handicapped performed better than those who did not when a positive or negative evaluation was expected, in some conditions. In Study 2, we used a situationally imposed handicap and found that both social- and self-evaluation participants showed improved performance in the presence of the handicap. In Study 3, when a positive or negative evaluation was expected, high self-handicappers performed better after choosing to self-handicap, for both social- and self-evaluative motives. Little evidence of self-handicapping or effects on subsequent performance was found for low self-handicappers. No evidence was found for self-handicapping among participants who could not be evaluated. Discussion centers around motives to self-handicap and implications for subsequent performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002369956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002369956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/obhd.1995.1092

DO - 10.1006/obhd.1995.1092

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 84

EP - 102

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 1

ER -