TY - JOUR
T1 - Self-Perceptions and Self-Assessments of Livestock Producers in Pennsylvania
AU - Nordstrom, P. A.
AU - Wilson, L. L.
AU - Richards, M. J.
AU - Kelsey, T. W.
AU - Pitts, C. W.
N1 - Funding Information:
1Partially funded by research funds administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture and Penn State University appropriations. 2To whom correspondence should be ad dressed: lwilson@das.psu.edu Reviewed by J. T. Brake, C. J. Kercher, and J. I. McNitt.
Publisher Copyright:
© 1999 American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists.
PY - 1999/9/1
Y1 - 1999/9/1
N2 - A study was conducted 1) to identify the concerns that producers believe the public has regarding animal agriculture, 2) to provide a self-assessment by producers of their industries, and 3) to identify issues producers feel the public may misunderstand and which can be alleviated through public education. Surveys were mailed to Pennsylvania producers of five animal industries: beef, dairy, swine, poultry, and veal. The response rate received was 18 to 22%, depending on the industry (n = 540). The two most frequent complaints received by the producers from the public were odor and flies, respectively. Self-assessments indicated that the highest-ranked concern of producers was harmful chemicals in the food supply; food storage and use of too many inputs were of least concern. Issues identified by producers as frequently being misunderstood by the public and in need of the most public education were water quality, food safety, air quality, farm animal welfare, soil quality, use of resources, and recycling of by-products, respectively. This survey demonstrated that a majority of livestock producers (63.2%) maintains that the care they currently provide to their animals has improved over the past 10 yr; however, only 26.3% of the producers believe that the public feels that the quality of animal care has improved. This discrepancy may be a result of an increasing absence of filial ties to production agriculture and the tendency of the public to rely on non-farm sources of information about farming.
AB - A study was conducted 1) to identify the concerns that producers believe the public has regarding animal agriculture, 2) to provide a self-assessment by producers of their industries, and 3) to identify issues producers feel the public may misunderstand and which can be alleviated through public education. Surveys were mailed to Pennsylvania producers of five animal industries: beef, dairy, swine, poultry, and veal. The response rate received was 18 to 22%, depending on the industry (n = 540). The two most frequent complaints received by the producers from the public were odor and flies, respectively. Self-assessments indicated that the highest-ranked concern of producers was harmful chemicals in the food supply; food storage and use of too many inputs were of least concern. Issues identified by producers as frequently being misunderstood by the public and in need of the most public education were water quality, food safety, air quality, farm animal welfare, soil quality, use of resources, and recycling of by-products, respectively. This survey demonstrated that a majority of livestock producers (63.2%) maintains that the care they currently provide to their animals has improved over the past 10 yr; however, only 26.3% of the producers believe that the public feels that the quality of animal care has improved. This discrepancy may be a result of an increasing absence of filial ties to production agriculture and the tendency of the public to rely on non-farm sources of information about farming.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957620965&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957620965&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31751-4
DO - 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31751-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84957620965
SN - 2590-2873
VL - 15
SP - 156
EP - 163
JO - Applied Animal Science
JF - Applied Animal Science
IS - 3
ER -