Self‐serving Bias and Actor‐Observer Differences In Organizations: An Empirical Analysis

Dennis Arnold Gioia, Henry P. Sims

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Self‐serving attributional bias is the tendency for a subordinate to attribute personal (internal) cause for successful performance but to assign cause for failures to external factors. The actor‐observed difference in attribution is the tendency for concerned observers (managers) of a subordinate's performance to attribute cause for the performance to factors internal to the subordinate, in direct opposition to the subordinate's external attribution for the same performance. This research investigated both phenomena. Twenty‐four experienced managers served as manager/subjects in simulated appraisal situations. Subjects with prior work experience served as subordinate/subjects. Each manager participated in four separate simulated performance appraisals, under differing conditions of objective performance and work history, for a total of 96 interactions. The results revealed a strong self‐serving bias on the part of subordinates. The results also strongly supported the notion of an actor‐observer difference in performance attribution. Subordinates tended to attribute more externally and managers tended to attribute more internally (to the subordinate), regardless of performance level. The research also served to delineate and articulate the relationship between self‐serving bias and actor‐observer differences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)547-563
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1985

Fingerprint

Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

@article{5c133b6fabcf4bfb8a54e6ed88ccb9c4,
title = "Self‐serving Bias and Actor‐Observer Differences In Organizations: An Empirical Analysis",
abstract = "Self‐serving attributional bias is the tendency for a subordinate to attribute personal (internal) cause for successful performance but to assign cause for failures to external factors. The actor‐observed difference in attribution is the tendency for concerned observers (managers) of a subordinate's performance to attribute cause for the performance to factors internal to the subordinate, in direct opposition to the subordinate's external attribution for the same performance. This research investigated both phenomena. Twenty‐four experienced managers served as manager/subjects in simulated appraisal situations. Subjects with prior work experience served as subordinate/subjects. Each manager participated in four separate simulated performance appraisals, under differing conditions of objective performance and work history, for a total of 96 interactions. The results revealed a strong self‐serving bias on the part of subordinates. The results also strongly supported the notion of an actor‐observer difference in performance attribution. Subordinates tended to attribute more externally and managers tended to attribute more internally (to the subordinate), regardless of performance level. The research also served to delineate and articulate the relationship between self‐serving bias and actor‐observer differences.",
author = "Gioia, {Dennis Arnold} and Sims, {Henry P.}",
year = "1985",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb00919.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "547--563",
journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0021-9029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

Self‐serving Bias and Actor‐Observer Differences In Organizations : An Empirical Analysis. / Gioia, Dennis Arnold; Sims, Henry P.

In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 6, 01.01.1985, p. 547-563.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self‐serving Bias and Actor‐Observer Differences In Organizations

T2 - An Empirical Analysis

AU - Gioia, Dennis Arnold

AU - Sims, Henry P.

PY - 1985/1/1

Y1 - 1985/1/1

N2 - Self‐serving attributional bias is the tendency for a subordinate to attribute personal (internal) cause for successful performance but to assign cause for failures to external factors. The actor‐observed difference in attribution is the tendency for concerned observers (managers) of a subordinate's performance to attribute cause for the performance to factors internal to the subordinate, in direct opposition to the subordinate's external attribution for the same performance. This research investigated both phenomena. Twenty‐four experienced managers served as manager/subjects in simulated appraisal situations. Subjects with prior work experience served as subordinate/subjects. Each manager participated in four separate simulated performance appraisals, under differing conditions of objective performance and work history, for a total of 96 interactions. The results revealed a strong self‐serving bias on the part of subordinates. The results also strongly supported the notion of an actor‐observer difference in performance attribution. Subordinates tended to attribute more externally and managers tended to attribute more internally (to the subordinate), regardless of performance level. The research also served to delineate and articulate the relationship between self‐serving bias and actor‐observer differences.

AB - Self‐serving attributional bias is the tendency for a subordinate to attribute personal (internal) cause for successful performance but to assign cause for failures to external factors. The actor‐observed difference in attribution is the tendency for concerned observers (managers) of a subordinate's performance to attribute cause for the performance to factors internal to the subordinate, in direct opposition to the subordinate's external attribution for the same performance. This research investigated both phenomena. Twenty‐four experienced managers served as manager/subjects in simulated appraisal situations. Subjects with prior work experience served as subordinate/subjects. Each manager participated in four separate simulated performance appraisals, under differing conditions of objective performance and work history, for a total of 96 interactions. The results revealed a strong self‐serving bias on the part of subordinates. The results also strongly supported the notion of an actor‐observer difference in performance attribution. Subordinates tended to attribute more externally and managers tended to attribute more internally (to the subordinate), regardless of performance level. The research also served to delineate and articulate the relationship between self‐serving bias and actor‐observer differences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0011606632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0011606632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb00919.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb00919.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0011606632

VL - 15

SP - 547

EP - 563

JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0021-9029

IS - 6

ER -