Semiotics in Mainstream American Communication Studies: A Review of Principal U.S.A. Journals in the Context of Communicology

Isaac E. Catt, Deborah Eicher-Catt

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reviews semiotics research in mainstream journals of communication. First, we offer a quantitative analysis of the extent to which the journals recognize semiotics as a legitimate area of concern. Second, we conduct a qualitative assessment of the few substantive contributions to semiotics in the communication literature in order to comprehend how the research conceives semiotics. We discuss both strengths and weaknesses of this very limited attention afforded semiotics and its relevance to promoting insightful semiotic scholarship more broadly in the communication discipline. Third, we contextualize our findings by suggesting that both implicit and explicit theoretical commitments incrementally imposed in the field's history and culture formed a barrier to advancing semiotic scholarship. Given a resurgence of interest in pragmatism (fueled by theoreticians such as C.S. Peirce, Dewey, Mead, and James), we end with a discussion of the relevance of semiotics to a fuller understanding of pragmatism. Our overall objectives are to stimulate interest in a neglected area of communication research and draw attention to the systematic research in communication and semiotics that has been pursued inside and "outside" the mainstream disciplinary matrix.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)176-200
Number of pages25
JournalReview of Communication
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2012

Fingerprint

Semiotics
semiotics
communication
Communication
pragmatism
communication research
commitment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication

Cite this

@article{cddf6259e57c48708675dfe9d53a8363,
title = "Semiotics in Mainstream American Communication Studies: A Review of Principal U.S.A. Journals in the Context of Communicology",
abstract = "This article reviews semiotics research in mainstream journals of communication. First, we offer a quantitative analysis of the extent to which the journals recognize semiotics as a legitimate area of concern. Second, we conduct a qualitative assessment of the few substantive contributions to semiotics in the communication literature in order to comprehend how the research conceives semiotics. We discuss both strengths and weaknesses of this very limited attention afforded semiotics and its relevance to promoting insightful semiotic scholarship more broadly in the communication discipline. Third, we contextualize our findings by suggesting that both implicit and explicit theoretical commitments incrementally imposed in the field's history and culture formed a barrier to advancing semiotic scholarship. Given a resurgence of interest in pragmatism (fueled by theoreticians such as C.S. Peirce, Dewey, Mead, and James), we end with a discussion of the relevance of semiotics to a fuller understanding of pragmatism. Our overall objectives are to stimulate interest in a neglected area of communication research and draw attention to the systematic research in communication and semiotics that has been pursued inside and {"}outside{"} the mainstream disciplinary matrix.",
author = "Catt, {Isaac E.} and Deborah Eicher-Catt",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15358593.2012.666260",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "176--200",
journal = "Review of Communication",
issn = "1535-8593",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Semiotics in Mainstream American Communication Studies : A Review of Principal U.S.A. Journals in the Context of Communicology. / Catt, Isaac E.; Eicher-Catt, Deborah.

In: Review of Communication, Vol. 12, No. 3, 01.07.2012, p. 176-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Semiotics in Mainstream American Communication Studies

T2 - A Review of Principal U.S.A. Journals in the Context of Communicology

AU - Catt, Isaac E.

AU - Eicher-Catt, Deborah

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - This article reviews semiotics research in mainstream journals of communication. First, we offer a quantitative analysis of the extent to which the journals recognize semiotics as a legitimate area of concern. Second, we conduct a qualitative assessment of the few substantive contributions to semiotics in the communication literature in order to comprehend how the research conceives semiotics. We discuss both strengths and weaknesses of this very limited attention afforded semiotics and its relevance to promoting insightful semiotic scholarship more broadly in the communication discipline. Third, we contextualize our findings by suggesting that both implicit and explicit theoretical commitments incrementally imposed in the field's history and culture formed a barrier to advancing semiotic scholarship. Given a resurgence of interest in pragmatism (fueled by theoreticians such as C.S. Peirce, Dewey, Mead, and James), we end with a discussion of the relevance of semiotics to a fuller understanding of pragmatism. Our overall objectives are to stimulate interest in a neglected area of communication research and draw attention to the systematic research in communication and semiotics that has been pursued inside and "outside" the mainstream disciplinary matrix.

AB - This article reviews semiotics research in mainstream journals of communication. First, we offer a quantitative analysis of the extent to which the journals recognize semiotics as a legitimate area of concern. Second, we conduct a qualitative assessment of the few substantive contributions to semiotics in the communication literature in order to comprehend how the research conceives semiotics. We discuss both strengths and weaknesses of this very limited attention afforded semiotics and its relevance to promoting insightful semiotic scholarship more broadly in the communication discipline. Third, we contextualize our findings by suggesting that both implicit and explicit theoretical commitments incrementally imposed in the field's history and culture formed a barrier to advancing semiotic scholarship. Given a resurgence of interest in pragmatism (fueled by theoreticians such as C.S. Peirce, Dewey, Mead, and James), we end with a discussion of the relevance of semiotics to a fuller understanding of pragmatism. Our overall objectives are to stimulate interest in a neglected area of communication research and draw attention to the systematic research in communication and semiotics that has been pursued inside and "outside" the mainstream disciplinary matrix.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862329220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862329220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15358593.2012.666260

DO - 10.1080/15358593.2012.666260

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84862329220

VL - 12

SP - 176

EP - 200

JO - Review of Communication

JF - Review of Communication

SN - 1535-8593

IS - 3

ER -