Sending mixed signals: the role of gender and partisanship in evaluations of political leaders

Nicholas Lafayette Pyeatt, Alixandra B. Yanus

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Partisanship and gender are powerful heuristic cues used by citizens to understand their elected officials’ ideology. When these cues send complementary signals – a Democratic woman or a Republican man – we expect they will aid citizens in evaluating their leaders’ political ideology. However, when partisanship and gender send conflicting signals, we expect citizens will be more likely to misperceive their leaders’ beliefs. We test this proposition using ideological evaluations of incumbent US senators collected in the 2010 and 2012 Cooperative Congressional Election Studies. The findings support our hypotheses, illustrating voters’ reliance on both partisan and gender cues. Our results suggest potential consequences for not only Republican women, but also Democratic men.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)423-434
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

leader
citizen
gender
evaluation
election research
political ideology
heuristics
ideology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{6ccd3ac4f51b49cdbb3a5ca135e9125b,
title = "Sending mixed signals: the role of gender and partisanship in evaluations of political leaders",
abstract = "Partisanship and gender are powerful heuristic cues used by citizens to understand their elected officials’ ideology. When these cues send complementary signals – a Democratic woman or a Republican man – we expect they will aid citizens in evaluating their leaders’ political ideology. However, when partisanship and gender send conflicting signals, we expect citizens will be more likely to misperceive their leaders’ beliefs. We test this proposition using ideological evaluations of incumbent US senators collected in the 2010 and 2012 Cooperative Congressional Election Studies. The findings support our hypotheses, illustrating voters’ reliance on both partisan and gender cues. Our results suggest potential consequences for not only Republican women, but also Democratic men.",
author = "Pyeatt, {Nicholas Lafayette} and Yanus, {Alixandra B.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/17457289.2016.1181638",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "423--434",
journal = "Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties",
issn = "1745-7289",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Sending mixed signals : the role of gender and partisanship in evaluations of political leaders. / Pyeatt, Nicholas Lafayette; Yanus, Alixandra B.

In: Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.10.2016, p. 423-434.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sending mixed signals

T2 - the role of gender and partisanship in evaluations of political leaders

AU - Pyeatt, Nicholas Lafayette

AU - Yanus, Alixandra B.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Partisanship and gender are powerful heuristic cues used by citizens to understand their elected officials’ ideology. When these cues send complementary signals – a Democratic woman or a Republican man – we expect they will aid citizens in evaluating their leaders’ political ideology. However, when partisanship and gender send conflicting signals, we expect citizens will be more likely to misperceive their leaders’ beliefs. We test this proposition using ideological evaluations of incumbent US senators collected in the 2010 and 2012 Cooperative Congressional Election Studies. The findings support our hypotheses, illustrating voters’ reliance on both partisan and gender cues. Our results suggest potential consequences for not only Republican women, but also Democratic men.

AB - Partisanship and gender are powerful heuristic cues used by citizens to understand their elected officials’ ideology. When these cues send complementary signals – a Democratic woman or a Republican man – we expect they will aid citizens in evaluating their leaders’ political ideology. However, when partisanship and gender send conflicting signals, we expect citizens will be more likely to misperceive their leaders’ beliefs. We test this proposition using ideological evaluations of incumbent US senators collected in the 2010 and 2012 Cooperative Congressional Election Studies. The findings support our hypotheses, illustrating voters’ reliance on both partisan and gender cues. Our results suggest potential consequences for not only Republican women, but also Democratic men.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966713634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84966713634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17457289.2016.1181638

DO - 10.1080/17457289.2016.1181638

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 26

SP - 423

EP - 434

JO - Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties

JF - Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties

SN - 1745-7289

IS - 4

ER -