Serial Argument Goals and Changes in Perceived Conflict Resolution: A Dyadic Analysis

Timothy R. Worley, Jennifer A. Samp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior research on serial arguments has generally been retrospective and cross-sectional in nature. Accordingly, little is known about the extent to which features of single argumentative episodes may impact arguers’ progress toward successfully resolving serial arguments. This study utilized self-reports of serial argument goals from 75 heterosexual couples engaged in live argumentative episodes to assess associations between serial argument goals and the degree of change in perceived resolution from preargument to postargument. Results illustrated that the importance and valence of actors’ and partners’ serial argument goals were associated with perceived changes in resolution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)264-281
Number of pages18
JournalWestern Journal of Communication
Volume80
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 26 2016

Fingerprint

conflict resolution
Conflict Resolution

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Communication

Cite this

@article{094d06e5be754358a90e1c67a7f68695,
title = "Serial Argument Goals and Changes in Perceived Conflict Resolution: A Dyadic Analysis",
abstract = "Prior research on serial arguments has generally been retrospective and cross-sectional in nature. Accordingly, little is known about the extent to which features of single argumentative episodes may impact arguers’ progress toward successfully resolving serial arguments. This study utilized self-reports of serial argument goals from 75 heterosexual couples engaged in live argumentative episodes to assess associations between serial argument goals and the degree of change in perceived resolution from preargument to postargument. Results illustrated that the importance and valence of actors’ and partners’ serial argument goals were associated with perceived changes in resolution.",
author = "Worley, {Timothy R.} and Samp, {Jennifer A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1080/10570314.2016.1143961",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "264--281",
journal = "Western Journal of Communication",
issn = "1057-0314",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Serial Argument Goals and Changes in Perceived Conflict Resolution : A Dyadic Analysis. / Worley, Timothy R.; Samp, Jennifer A.

In: Western Journal of Communication, Vol. 80, No. 3, 26.05.2016, p. 264-281.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Serial Argument Goals and Changes in Perceived Conflict Resolution

T2 - A Dyadic Analysis

AU - Worley, Timothy R.

AU - Samp, Jennifer A.

PY - 2016/5/26

Y1 - 2016/5/26

N2 - Prior research on serial arguments has generally been retrospective and cross-sectional in nature. Accordingly, little is known about the extent to which features of single argumentative episodes may impact arguers’ progress toward successfully resolving serial arguments. This study utilized self-reports of serial argument goals from 75 heterosexual couples engaged in live argumentative episodes to assess associations between serial argument goals and the degree of change in perceived resolution from preargument to postargument. Results illustrated that the importance and valence of actors’ and partners’ serial argument goals were associated with perceived changes in resolution.

AB - Prior research on serial arguments has generally been retrospective and cross-sectional in nature. Accordingly, little is known about the extent to which features of single argumentative episodes may impact arguers’ progress toward successfully resolving serial arguments. This study utilized self-reports of serial argument goals from 75 heterosexual couples engaged in live argumentative episodes to assess associations between serial argument goals and the degree of change in perceived resolution from preargument to postargument. Results illustrated that the importance and valence of actors’ and partners’ serial argument goals were associated with perceived changes in resolution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961217499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961217499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10570314.2016.1143961

DO - 10.1080/10570314.2016.1143961

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84961217499

VL - 80

SP - 264

EP - 281

JO - Western Journal of Communication

JF - Western Journal of Communication

SN - 1057-0314

IS - 3

ER -