Setting a judicial agenda: The decision to grant en banc review in the U.S. Courts of Appeals

Micheal W. Giles, Thomas G. Walker, Christopher Jon Zorn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Agenda setting has received only modest attention in studies of the judiciary. This reflects the limited control most courts exercise over the cases they hear. We analyze the influence of ideological and legal factors on the grant of en banc rehearing in the U.S. Courts of Appeals - one of the few instances of agenda control in the lower federal courts. Unlike previous research, we examine multiple decision points in the agenda-setting process. Our results indicate that the influence of attitudinal and legal factors varies across decision points revealing a complexity obscured in previous work. Our research underscores the importance of treating agenda setting as a process rather than as a single decision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)852-866
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume68
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2006

Fingerprint

legal factors
appeal
judiciary
grant

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{7ae4fd3a1e3d43c8a909aa53ae97c9f5,
title = "Setting a judicial agenda: The decision to grant en banc review in the U.S. Courts of Appeals",
abstract = "Agenda setting has received only modest attention in studies of the judiciary. This reflects the limited control most courts exercise over the cases they hear. We analyze the influence of ideological and legal factors on the grant of en banc rehearing in the U.S. Courts of Appeals - one of the few instances of agenda control in the lower federal courts. Unlike previous research, we examine multiple decision points in the agenda-setting process. Our results indicate that the influence of attitudinal and legal factors varies across decision points revealing a complexity obscured in previous work. Our research underscores the importance of treating agenda setting as a process rather than as a single decision.",
author = "Giles, {Micheal W.} and Walker, {Thomas G.} and Zorn, {Christopher Jon}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00475.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "852--866",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

Setting a judicial agenda : The decision to grant en banc review in the U.S. Courts of Appeals. / Giles, Micheal W.; Walker, Thomas G.; Zorn, Christopher Jon.

In: Journal of Politics, Vol. 68, No. 4, 01.11.2006, p. 852-866.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Setting a judicial agenda

T2 - The decision to grant en banc review in the U.S. Courts of Appeals

AU - Giles, Micheal W.

AU - Walker, Thomas G.

AU - Zorn, Christopher Jon

PY - 2006/11/1

Y1 - 2006/11/1

N2 - Agenda setting has received only modest attention in studies of the judiciary. This reflects the limited control most courts exercise over the cases they hear. We analyze the influence of ideological and legal factors on the grant of en banc rehearing in the U.S. Courts of Appeals - one of the few instances of agenda control in the lower federal courts. Unlike previous research, we examine multiple decision points in the agenda-setting process. Our results indicate that the influence of attitudinal and legal factors varies across decision points revealing a complexity obscured in previous work. Our research underscores the importance of treating agenda setting as a process rather than as a single decision.

AB - Agenda setting has received only modest attention in studies of the judiciary. This reflects the limited control most courts exercise over the cases they hear. We analyze the influence of ideological and legal factors on the grant of en banc rehearing in the U.S. Courts of Appeals - one of the few instances of agenda control in the lower federal courts. Unlike previous research, we examine multiple decision points in the agenda-setting process. Our results indicate that the influence of attitudinal and legal factors varies across decision points revealing a complexity obscured in previous work. Our research underscores the importance of treating agenda setting as a process rather than as a single decision.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749563101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749563101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00475.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00475.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33749563101

VL - 68

SP - 852

EP - 866

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 4

ER -