Sex-role orientation and attachment styles of sex Offenders1

Mary M. Schneck, Thomas G. Bowers, Maria Turkson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Given the increase of individuals who have a history of sexual offenses, there has been an increase in research on the etiology of sex-offending behavior. The present purpose was to evaluate the relationship between sex-role orientation and attachment styles of males who were sex offenders. Analysis yielded statistically significant differences between comparison (n=22) and clinical groups (n=21) in gender roles, with little sign of the androgynous gender type for sex offenders. The offender group showed significantly lower frequency of androgyny scores and significantly higher scores on feminine and undifferentiated orientations, supporting the theoretical view of sex offenders as being "cross-sex-typed." In addition, the sex offender group had a significantly higher mean score on anxious-avoidant relationship attachment. Based on the present findings, there appears to be a need to help sex offenders explore how their gender roles may relate to their sex-offending behavior and assist sex offenders in the development of adaptive relationships with reduced anxiety and ambivalence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)624-638
Number of pages15
JournalPsychological reports
Volume110
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2012

Fingerprint

Sexual Behavior
Anxiety
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Schneck, Mary M. ; Bowers, Thomas G. ; Turkson, Maria. / Sex-role orientation and attachment styles of sex Offenders1. In: Psychological reports. 2012 ; Vol. 110, No. 2. pp. 624-638.
@article{124db5573c554f3badf1acf19fde0d18,
title = "Sex-role orientation and attachment styles of sex Offenders1",
abstract = "Given the increase of individuals who have a history of sexual offenses, there has been an increase in research on the etiology of sex-offending behavior. The present purpose was to evaluate the relationship between sex-role orientation and attachment styles of males who were sex offenders. Analysis yielded statistically significant differences between comparison (n=22) and clinical groups (n=21) in gender roles, with little sign of the androgynous gender type for sex offenders. The offender group showed significantly lower frequency of androgyny scores and significantly higher scores on feminine and undifferentiated orientations, supporting the theoretical view of sex offenders as being {"}cross-sex-typed.{"} In addition, the sex offender group had a significantly higher mean score on anxious-avoidant relationship attachment. Based on the present findings, there appears to be a need to help sex offenders explore how their gender roles may relate to their sex-offending behavior and assist sex offenders in the development of adaptive relationships with reduced anxiety and ambivalence.",
author = "Schneck, {Mary M.} and Bowers, {Thomas G.} and Maria Turkson",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2466/02.09.16.21.PR0.110.2.624-638",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "110",
pages = "624--638",
journal = "Psychological Reports",
issn = "0033-2941",
publisher = "Ammons Scientific Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Sex-role orientation and attachment styles of sex Offenders1. / Schneck, Mary M.; Bowers, Thomas G.; Turkson, Maria.

In: Psychological reports, Vol. 110, No. 2, 01.04.2012, p. 624-638.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex-role orientation and attachment styles of sex Offenders1

AU - Schneck, Mary M.

AU - Bowers, Thomas G.

AU - Turkson, Maria

PY - 2012/4/1

Y1 - 2012/4/1

N2 - Given the increase of individuals who have a history of sexual offenses, there has been an increase in research on the etiology of sex-offending behavior. The present purpose was to evaluate the relationship between sex-role orientation and attachment styles of males who were sex offenders. Analysis yielded statistically significant differences between comparison (n=22) and clinical groups (n=21) in gender roles, with little sign of the androgynous gender type for sex offenders. The offender group showed significantly lower frequency of androgyny scores and significantly higher scores on feminine and undifferentiated orientations, supporting the theoretical view of sex offenders as being "cross-sex-typed." In addition, the sex offender group had a significantly higher mean score on anxious-avoidant relationship attachment. Based on the present findings, there appears to be a need to help sex offenders explore how their gender roles may relate to their sex-offending behavior and assist sex offenders in the development of adaptive relationships with reduced anxiety and ambivalence.

AB - Given the increase of individuals who have a history of sexual offenses, there has been an increase in research on the etiology of sex-offending behavior. The present purpose was to evaluate the relationship between sex-role orientation and attachment styles of males who were sex offenders. Analysis yielded statistically significant differences between comparison (n=22) and clinical groups (n=21) in gender roles, with little sign of the androgynous gender type for sex offenders. The offender group showed significantly lower frequency of androgyny scores and significantly higher scores on feminine and undifferentiated orientations, supporting the theoretical view of sex offenders as being "cross-sex-typed." In addition, the sex offender group had a significantly higher mean score on anxious-avoidant relationship attachment. Based on the present findings, there appears to be a need to help sex offenders explore how their gender roles may relate to their sex-offending behavior and assist sex offenders in the development of adaptive relationships with reduced anxiety and ambivalence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861212437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861212437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2466/02.09.16.21.PR0.110.2.624-638

DO - 10.2466/02.09.16.21.PR0.110.2.624-638

M3 - Article

VL - 110

SP - 624

EP - 638

JO - Psychological Reports

JF - Psychological Reports

SN - 0033-2941

IS - 2

ER -