Should Middle School Students with Learning Problems Copy and Paste Notes from the Internet? Mixed-Methods Evidence of Study Barriers

L. Brent Igo, Roger A. Bruning, Paul J. Riccomini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the experimental phase of this mixed-methods study, 49 middle school students receiving special education services took notes from the Internet under either a written notes or a copy-and-paste notes condition. Immediate, cued-recall measures of factual learning showed that students who wrote their notes were better able to recall what they had noted, although recall was low for all students. However, after a one-week delay (which included two classroom opportunities to study their notes), students who pasted their notes performed significantly better on two different measures of factual learning than students who wrote their notes. Follow-up student interviews and analyses of notes revealed a robust explanatory theme: many written notes contained barriers to learning (e.g., illegible handwriting, spelling errors, and/or indecipherable paraphrases), which likely reduced the benefit of study time. Implications for instructing this population of students to use copy and paste while gathering information on the Internet are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalRMLE Online
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Internet
learning
evidence
student
handwriting
special education
classroom
interview

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

@article{d5ae75269afe4f5789e111242a1be750,
title = "Should Middle School Students with Learning Problems Copy and Paste Notes from the Internet? Mixed-Methods Evidence of Study Barriers",
abstract = "In the experimental phase of this mixed-methods study, 49 middle school students receiving special education services took notes from the Internet under either a written notes or a copy-and-paste notes condition. Immediate, cued-recall measures of factual learning showed that students who wrote their notes were better able to recall what they had noted, although recall was low for all students. However, after a one-week delay (which included two classroom opportunities to study their notes), students who pasted their notes performed significantly better on two different measures of factual learning than students who wrote their notes. Follow-up student interviews and analyses of notes revealed a robust explanatory theme: many written notes contained barriers to learning (e.g., illegible handwriting, spelling errors, and/or indecipherable paraphrases), which likely reduced the benefit of study time. Implications for instructing this population of students to use copy and paste while gathering information on the Internet are discussed.",
author = "Igo, {L. Brent} and Bruning, {Roger A.} and Riccomini, {Paul J.}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/19404476.2009.11462065",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "RMLE Online",
issn = "1940-4476",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Should Middle School Students with Learning Problems Copy and Paste Notes from the Internet? Mixed-Methods Evidence of Study Barriers. / Igo, L. Brent; Bruning, Roger A.; Riccomini, Paul J.

In: RMLE Online, Vol. 33, No. 2, 01.01.2009, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should Middle School Students with Learning Problems Copy and Paste Notes from the Internet? Mixed-Methods Evidence of Study Barriers

AU - Igo, L. Brent

AU - Bruning, Roger A.

AU - Riccomini, Paul J.

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - In the experimental phase of this mixed-methods study, 49 middle school students receiving special education services took notes from the Internet under either a written notes or a copy-and-paste notes condition. Immediate, cued-recall measures of factual learning showed that students who wrote their notes were better able to recall what they had noted, although recall was low for all students. However, after a one-week delay (which included two classroom opportunities to study their notes), students who pasted their notes performed significantly better on two different measures of factual learning than students who wrote their notes. Follow-up student interviews and analyses of notes revealed a robust explanatory theme: many written notes contained barriers to learning (e.g., illegible handwriting, spelling errors, and/or indecipherable paraphrases), which likely reduced the benefit of study time. Implications for instructing this population of students to use copy and paste while gathering information on the Internet are discussed.

AB - In the experimental phase of this mixed-methods study, 49 middle school students receiving special education services took notes from the Internet under either a written notes or a copy-and-paste notes condition. Immediate, cued-recall measures of factual learning showed that students who wrote their notes were better able to recall what they had noted, although recall was low for all students. However, after a one-week delay (which included two classroom opportunities to study their notes), students who pasted their notes performed significantly better on two different measures of factual learning than students who wrote their notes. Follow-up student interviews and analyses of notes revealed a robust explanatory theme: many written notes contained barriers to learning (e.g., illegible handwriting, spelling errors, and/or indecipherable paraphrases), which likely reduced the benefit of study time. Implications for instructing this population of students to use copy and paste while gathering information on the Internet are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956342366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956342366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19404476.2009.11462065

DO - 10.1080/19404476.2009.11462065

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77956342366

VL - 33

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - RMLE Online

JF - RMLE Online

SN - 1940-4476

IS - 2

ER -