Sic semper tyrannis? Power, repression, and assassination since the second world war

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The killing of a head of state is among the most severe and consequential forms of political violence. But to date, there have been no systematic studies of the incidence of such assassinations, with the few existing case studies tending to emphasize the uniqueness of those events. Drawing on existing theories of social protest and contentious politics, we argue instead that institutional and sociopolitical factors should be important correlates of assassination. We examine empirically the implications of this theory, using data on the incidence of assassinations of heads of state between 1946 and 2000. Our findings suggest that institutional factors related to leadership succession, institutionalized power, and levels of repression interact to influence the occurrence of such killings. Notable in this respect is our conclusion that, while repressive leaders are at greater risk for assassination, the effect of repression is moderated by executive power, such that weak, repressive leaders in nondemocratic systems face the highest risk of assassination. Our findings dovetail neatly with the broader literature on other forms of insurgency, suggesting that assassinations are but one manifestation of the larger phenomenon of political violence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)489-501
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume68
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2006

Fingerprint

head of state
political violence
repression
World War
incidence
leader
executive power
institutional factors
protest
leadership
politics
event
literature

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{1313d1daa8264194a134572aabd08f74,
title = "Sic semper tyrannis? Power, repression, and assassination since the second world war",
abstract = "The killing of a head of state is among the most severe and consequential forms of political violence. But to date, there have been no systematic studies of the incidence of such assassinations, with the few existing case studies tending to emphasize the uniqueness of those events. Drawing on existing theories of social protest and contentious politics, we argue instead that institutional and sociopolitical factors should be important correlates of assassination. We examine empirically the implications of this theory, using data on the incidence of assassinations of heads of state between 1946 and 2000. Our findings suggest that institutional factors related to leadership succession, institutionalized power, and levels of repression interact to influence the occurrence of such killings. Notable in this respect is our conclusion that, while repressive leaders are at greater risk for assassination, the effect of repression is moderated by executive power, such that weak, repressive leaders in nondemocratic systems face the highest risk of assassination. Our findings dovetail neatly with the broader literature on other forms of insurgency, suggesting that assassinations are but one manifestation of the larger phenomenon of political violence.",
author = "Zaryab Iqbal and Zorn, {Christopher Jon}",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00440.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "489--501",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

Sic semper tyrannis? Power, repression, and assassination since the second world war. / Iqbal, Zaryab; Zorn, Christopher Jon.

In: Journal of Politics, Vol. 68, No. 3, 01.08.2006, p. 489-501.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sic semper tyrannis? Power, repression, and assassination since the second world war

AU - Iqbal, Zaryab

AU - Zorn, Christopher Jon

PY - 2006/8/1

Y1 - 2006/8/1

N2 - The killing of a head of state is among the most severe and consequential forms of political violence. But to date, there have been no systematic studies of the incidence of such assassinations, with the few existing case studies tending to emphasize the uniqueness of those events. Drawing on existing theories of social protest and contentious politics, we argue instead that institutional and sociopolitical factors should be important correlates of assassination. We examine empirically the implications of this theory, using data on the incidence of assassinations of heads of state between 1946 and 2000. Our findings suggest that institutional factors related to leadership succession, institutionalized power, and levels of repression interact to influence the occurrence of such killings. Notable in this respect is our conclusion that, while repressive leaders are at greater risk for assassination, the effect of repression is moderated by executive power, such that weak, repressive leaders in nondemocratic systems face the highest risk of assassination. Our findings dovetail neatly with the broader literature on other forms of insurgency, suggesting that assassinations are but one manifestation of the larger phenomenon of political violence.

AB - The killing of a head of state is among the most severe and consequential forms of political violence. But to date, there have been no systematic studies of the incidence of such assassinations, with the few existing case studies tending to emphasize the uniqueness of those events. Drawing on existing theories of social protest and contentious politics, we argue instead that institutional and sociopolitical factors should be important correlates of assassination. We examine empirically the implications of this theory, using data on the incidence of assassinations of heads of state between 1946 and 2000. Our findings suggest that institutional factors related to leadership succession, institutionalized power, and levels of repression interact to influence the occurrence of such killings. Notable in this respect is our conclusion that, while repressive leaders are at greater risk for assassination, the effect of repression is moderated by executive power, such that weak, repressive leaders in nondemocratic systems face the highest risk of assassination. Our findings dovetail neatly with the broader literature on other forms of insurgency, suggesting that assassinations are but one manifestation of the larger phenomenon of political violence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745699245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745699245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00440.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00440.x

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:33745699245

VL - 68

SP - 489

EP - 501

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 3

ER -