Simulation of crop productivity and responses to climate change in the year 2030

the role of future technologies, adjustments and adaptations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Advances in agricultural technology may affect the response of crop yields to a future climate change induced by greenhouse warming. We illustrate a methodology for simulating these effects by manipulating the parameters of a crop simulation model erosion productivity impact calculator (EPIC) to represent a set of proposed future technologies. Sensitivity analyses were first performed to test the effect of changes in each of the parameters individually. Crop yields were then simulated with a set of these future technologies under the climate of the 1951-1980 period (the 'control' climate) and under the climate of the 1930s (used as an analog of climate change), for locations in Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska and Kansas (MINK). The future technologies increased yields by an average of 72% above current levels, but had little effect on the sensitivity of crop yields to climate change. Next, realizing that attempts will probably be made to adjust farming practices to a changed climate, we implemented a set of changes which represent both currently available strategies for coping with the analog climate as well as new techniques which might be developed in response to a hotter, drier climate. With these changes in place, both yields and water use were less affected by the analog climate. If the direct effects of increased CO2 are also considered, yields of all crops but corn were equal to or greater than those that occur with no climate change. We also considered the economic feasibility of crop substitutions and shifts in the location of irrigated agriculture as adjustments to the analog climate. The final step in this analysis was to scale farm-level results to the regional level.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-127
Number of pages25
JournalAgricultural and Forest Meteorology
Volume59
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 1992

Fingerprint

climate change
climate
productivity
crop
crops
simulation
crop yield
Erosion Productivity Impact Calculator
agricultural technology
coping strategies
economic feasibility
crop models
water use
simulation models
substitution
farming systems
warming
maize
farm
agriculture

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Forestry
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

@article{05f272be83a94fc68c7471b13dc50a0c,
title = "Simulation of crop productivity and responses to climate change in the year 2030: the role of future technologies, adjustments and adaptations",
abstract = "Advances in agricultural technology may affect the response of crop yields to a future climate change induced by greenhouse warming. We illustrate a methodology for simulating these effects by manipulating the parameters of a crop simulation model erosion productivity impact calculator (EPIC) to represent a set of proposed future technologies. Sensitivity analyses were first performed to test the effect of changes in each of the parameters individually. Crop yields were then simulated with a set of these future technologies under the climate of the 1951-1980 period (the 'control' climate) and under the climate of the 1930s (used as an analog of climate change), for locations in Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska and Kansas (MINK). The future technologies increased yields by an average of 72{\%} above current levels, but had little effect on the sensitivity of crop yields to climate change. Next, realizing that attempts will probably be made to adjust farming practices to a changed climate, we implemented a set of changes which represent both currently available strategies for coping with the analog climate as well as new techniques which might be developed in response to a hotter, drier climate. With these changes in place, both yields and water use were less affected by the analog climate. If the direct effects of increased CO2 are also considered, yields of all crops but corn were equal to or greater than those that occur with no climate change. We also considered the economic feasibility of crop substitutions and shifts in the location of irrigated agriculture as adjustments to the analog climate. The final step in this analysis was to scale farm-level results to the regional level.",
author = "Easterling, {Mary McKenney} and Easterling, {William E.} and Rosenberg, {Norman J.}",
year = "1992",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/0168-1923(92)90088-L",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "103--127",
journal = "Agricultural and Forest Meteorology",
issn = "0168-1923",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simulation of crop productivity and responses to climate change in the year 2030

T2 - the role of future technologies, adjustments and adaptations

AU - Easterling, Mary McKenney

AU - Easterling, William E.

AU - Rosenberg, Norman J.

PY - 1992/4/15

Y1 - 1992/4/15

N2 - Advances in agricultural technology may affect the response of crop yields to a future climate change induced by greenhouse warming. We illustrate a methodology for simulating these effects by manipulating the parameters of a crop simulation model erosion productivity impact calculator (EPIC) to represent a set of proposed future technologies. Sensitivity analyses were first performed to test the effect of changes in each of the parameters individually. Crop yields were then simulated with a set of these future technologies under the climate of the 1951-1980 period (the 'control' climate) and under the climate of the 1930s (used as an analog of climate change), for locations in Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska and Kansas (MINK). The future technologies increased yields by an average of 72% above current levels, but had little effect on the sensitivity of crop yields to climate change. Next, realizing that attempts will probably be made to adjust farming practices to a changed climate, we implemented a set of changes which represent both currently available strategies for coping with the analog climate as well as new techniques which might be developed in response to a hotter, drier climate. With these changes in place, both yields and water use were less affected by the analog climate. If the direct effects of increased CO2 are also considered, yields of all crops but corn were equal to or greater than those that occur with no climate change. We also considered the economic feasibility of crop substitutions and shifts in the location of irrigated agriculture as adjustments to the analog climate. The final step in this analysis was to scale farm-level results to the regional level.

AB - Advances in agricultural technology may affect the response of crop yields to a future climate change induced by greenhouse warming. We illustrate a methodology for simulating these effects by manipulating the parameters of a crop simulation model erosion productivity impact calculator (EPIC) to represent a set of proposed future technologies. Sensitivity analyses were first performed to test the effect of changes in each of the parameters individually. Crop yields were then simulated with a set of these future technologies under the climate of the 1951-1980 period (the 'control' climate) and under the climate of the 1930s (used as an analog of climate change), for locations in Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska and Kansas (MINK). The future technologies increased yields by an average of 72% above current levels, but had little effect on the sensitivity of crop yields to climate change. Next, realizing that attempts will probably be made to adjust farming practices to a changed climate, we implemented a set of changes which represent both currently available strategies for coping with the analog climate as well as new techniques which might be developed in response to a hotter, drier climate. With these changes in place, both yields and water use were less affected by the analog climate. If the direct effects of increased CO2 are also considered, yields of all crops but corn were equal to or greater than those that occur with no climate change. We also considered the economic feasibility of crop substitutions and shifts in the location of irrigated agriculture as adjustments to the analog climate. The final step in this analysis was to scale farm-level results to the regional level.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026438887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026438887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0168-1923(92)90088-L

DO - 10.1016/0168-1923(92)90088-L

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 103

EP - 127

JO - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

JF - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

SN - 0168-1923

IS - 1-2

ER -