Simulation of dairy manure management and cropping systems

T. M. Harrigan, W. G. Bickert, C. A. Rotz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The dairy forage system model (DAFOSYM) was expanded to include submodels for the prediction of suitable days under a range of soil and crop residue conditions, draft of a wide range of tillage and seeding implements, and scheduling of manure handling, tillage and planting operations. Through simulation, the long-term performance, costs and net return for three tillage and four manure handling systems were compared on 150 and 400-cow representative dairy farms in Michigan. The analysis included all factors of milk production including manure production, storage and application, tillage, planting, crop growth, harvest, feed storage, and feeding. Mulch-tillage was the most economical tillage system, returning $15 to $26/cow-yr over conventional tillage with a 30% reduction in machinery, fuel, and labor costs. The highest net return among manure handling systems was associated with short-term storage and daily hauling, but the economic advantage of this system diminished if credit was not given for the value of all manure nutrients when spread daily. Long-term manure storage concentrated labor for spreading in the spring and fall. This delayed tillage and planting and increased feed costs as much as $24/cow-yr when manure hauling, tillage, and planting occurred in series. When labor and machinery were available for parallel field operations, manure handling method had little effect on the timeliness of tillage and planting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)563-574
Number of pages12
JournalApplied Engineering in Agriculture
Volume12
Issue number5
StatePublished - Dec 1 1996

Fingerprint

animal manure management
dairy manure
Manure
Dairies
Manures
management systems
cropping systems
tillage
manure handling
planting
animal manures
labor
Personnel
Costs and Cost Analysis
cows
Crops
Machinery
stubble tillage
manure storage
Costs

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Harrigan, T. M., Bickert, W. G., & Rotz, C. A. (1996). Simulation of dairy manure management and cropping systems. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 12(5), 563-574.
Harrigan, T. M. ; Bickert, W. G. ; Rotz, C. A. / Simulation of dairy manure management and cropping systems. In: Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 1996 ; Vol. 12, No. 5. pp. 563-574.
@article{7270a59e1178494d9c434531ecb204b5,
title = "Simulation of dairy manure management and cropping systems",
abstract = "The dairy forage system model (DAFOSYM) was expanded to include submodels for the prediction of suitable days under a range of soil and crop residue conditions, draft of a wide range of tillage and seeding implements, and scheduling of manure handling, tillage and planting operations. Through simulation, the long-term performance, costs and net return for three tillage and four manure handling systems were compared on 150 and 400-cow representative dairy farms in Michigan. The analysis included all factors of milk production including manure production, storage and application, tillage, planting, crop growth, harvest, feed storage, and feeding. Mulch-tillage was the most economical tillage system, returning $15 to $26/cow-yr over conventional tillage with a 30{\%} reduction in machinery, fuel, and labor costs. The highest net return among manure handling systems was associated with short-term storage and daily hauling, but the economic advantage of this system diminished if credit was not given for the value of all manure nutrients when spread daily. Long-term manure storage concentrated labor for spreading in the spring and fall. This delayed tillage and planting and increased feed costs as much as $24/cow-yr when manure hauling, tillage, and planting occurred in series. When labor and machinery were available for parallel field operations, manure handling method had little effect on the timeliness of tillage and planting.",
author = "Harrigan, {T. M.} and Bickert, {W. G.} and Rotz, {C. A.}",
year = "1996",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "563--574",
journal = "Applied Engineering in Agriculture",
issn = "0883-8542",
publisher = "American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers",
number = "5",

}

Harrigan, TM, Bickert, WG & Rotz, CA 1996, 'Simulation of dairy manure management and cropping systems', Applied Engineering in Agriculture, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 563-574.

Simulation of dairy manure management and cropping systems. / Harrigan, T. M.; Bickert, W. G.; Rotz, C. A.

In: Applied Engineering in Agriculture, Vol. 12, No. 5, 01.12.1996, p. 563-574.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simulation of dairy manure management and cropping systems

AU - Harrigan, T. M.

AU - Bickert, W. G.

AU - Rotz, C. A.

PY - 1996/12/1

Y1 - 1996/12/1

N2 - The dairy forage system model (DAFOSYM) was expanded to include submodels for the prediction of suitable days under a range of soil and crop residue conditions, draft of a wide range of tillage and seeding implements, and scheduling of manure handling, tillage and planting operations. Through simulation, the long-term performance, costs and net return for three tillage and four manure handling systems were compared on 150 and 400-cow representative dairy farms in Michigan. The analysis included all factors of milk production including manure production, storage and application, tillage, planting, crop growth, harvest, feed storage, and feeding. Mulch-tillage was the most economical tillage system, returning $15 to $26/cow-yr over conventional tillage with a 30% reduction in machinery, fuel, and labor costs. The highest net return among manure handling systems was associated with short-term storage and daily hauling, but the economic advantage of this system diminished if credit was not given for the value of all manure nutrients when spread daily. Long-term manure storage concentrated labor for spreading in the spring and fall. This delayed tillage and planting and increased feed costs as much as $24/cow-yr when manure hauling, tillage, and planting occurred in series. When labor and machinery were available for parallel field operations, manure handling method had little effect on the timeliness of tillage and planting.

AB - The dairy forage system model (DAFOSYM) was expanded to include submodels for the prediction of suitable days under a range of soil and crop residue conditions, draft of a wide range of tillage and seeding implements, and scheduling of manure handling, tillage and planting operations. Through simulation, the long-term performance, costs and net return for three tillage and four manure handling systems were compared on 150 and 400-cow representative dairy farms in Michigan. The analysis included all factors of milk production including manure production, storage and application, tillage, planting, crop growth, harvest, feed storage, and feeding. Mulch-tillage was the most economical tillage system, returning $15 to $26/cow-yr over conventional tillage with a 30% reduction in machinery, fuel, and labor costs. The highest net return among manure handling systems was associated with short-term storage and daily hauling, but the economic advantage of this system diminished if credit was not given for the value of all manure nutrients when spread daily. Long-term manure storage concentrated labor for spreading in the spring and fall. This delayed tillage and planting and increased feed costs as much as $24/cow-yr when manure hauling, tillage, and planting occurred in series. When labor and machinery were available for parallel field operations, manure handling method had little effect on the timeliness of tillage and planting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030247260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030247260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030247260

VL - 12

SP - 563

EP - 574

JO - Applied Engineering in Agriculture

JF - Applied Engineering in Agriculture

SN - 0883-8542

IS - 5

ER -

Harrigan TM, Bickert WG, Rotz CA. Simulation of dairy manure management and cropping systems. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 1996 Dec 1;12(5):563-574.