Simulations of crop responses to climate change: effects with present technology and currently available adjustments (the 'smart farmer' scenario)

William E. Easterling, Norman J. Rosenberg, Kathleen M. Lemon, Mary McKenney Easterling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

If climate changes, farmers will have to adapt to a new set of climate constraints. In this paper we examine the efficacy of strategies for dealing with climate change that are currently available to farmers and that are inexpensive to use; we refer to this group of strategies as 'adjustments'. Adjustment schemes of various kinds were identified for us by agricultural experts in the Missouri-Iowa-Nebraska-Kansas (MINK) states. These can involve changes in land use, changes in variety and crop selection, changes in planting and harvesting practices, and changes in fertility and pest management. Using the erosion productivity impact calculator (EPIC) model on a small set of representative farms, we tested adjustments of these kinds. The simulations show that earlier planting, longer-season cultivars and the use of furrow diking for moisture conservation would offset some of the yield losses induced by climate change in warm-season crops. Longer-season varieties of wheat (a cool-season crop) and shorter-season varieties of the perennials wheatgrass and alfalfa were also effective. The adjustments to climate change diminished yield losses in all crops but irrigated wheat. Despite the positive effects of adjustments, however, yields of all dryland warm-season crops remained lower than control levels. The adjustments also increased demand for irrigation water. Carbon dioxide enrichment had the same incremental effect on crop yields with or without adjustments (see the fourth paper in this issue), except in the case of alfalfa and sorghum, where a CO2-adjustment interaction was found. We conclude that currently available techniques would partially offset the yield reductions caused by a 1930s-like climate, but that in most crops the yield reductions would still be substantial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-102
Number of pages28
JournalAgricultural and Forest Meteorology
Volume59
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 1992

Fingerprint

climate change
farmers
crop
crops
simulation
warm season
crop yield
alfalfa
Erosion Productivity Impact Calculator
carbon dioxide enrichment
planting
climate
wheat
furrows
pest management
arid lands
land use change
irrigation water
pest control
sorghum

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Forestry
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

@article{8480cff4375747e1bcee40cdbfd6f19d,
title = "Simulations of crop responses to climate change: effects with present technology and currently available adjustments (the 'smart farmer' scenario)",
abstract = "If climate changes, farmers will have to adapt to a new set of climate constraints. In this paper we examine the efficacy of strategies for dealing with climate change that are currently available to farmers and that are inexpensive to use; we refer to this group of strategies as 'adjustments'. Adjustment schemes of various kinds were identified for us by agricultural experts in the Missouri-Iowa-Nebraska-Kansas (MINK) states. These can involve changes in land use, changes in variety and crop selection, changes in planting and harvesting practices, and changes in fertility and pest management. Using the erosion productivity impact calculator (EPIC) model on a small set of representative farms, we tested adjustments of these kinds. The simulations show that earlier planting, longer-season cultivars and the use of furrow diking for moisture conservation would offset some of the yield losses induced by climate change in warm-season crops. Longer-season varieties of wheat (a cool-season crop) and shorter-season varieties of the perennials wheatgrass and alfalfa were also effective. The adjustments to climate change diminished yield losses in all crops but irrigated wheat. Despite the positive effects of adjustments, however, yields of all dryland warm-season crops remained lower than control levels. The adjustments also increased demand for irrigation water. Carbon dioxide enrichment had the same incremental effect on crop yields with or without adjustments (see the fourth paper in this issue), except in the case of alfalfa and sorghum, where a CO2-adjustment interaction was found. We conclude that currently available techniques would partially offset the yield reductions caused by a 1930s-like climate, but that in most crops the yield reductions would still be substantial.",
author = "Easterling, {William E.} and Rosenberg, {Norman J.} and Lemon, {Kathleen M.} and Easterling, {Mary McKenney}",
year = "1992",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/0168-1923(92)90087-K",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "75--102",
journal = "Agricultural and Forest Meteorology",
issn = "0168-1923",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simulations of crop responses to climate change

T2 - effects with present technology and currently available adjustments (the 'smart farmer' scenario)

AU - Easterling, William E.

AU - Rosenberg, Norman J.

AU - Lemon, Kathleen M.

AU - Easterling, Mary McKenney

PY - 1992/4/15

Y1 - 1992/4/15

N2 - If climate changes, farmers will have to adapt to a new set of climate constraints. In this paper we examine the efficacy of strategies for dealing with climate change that are currently available to farmers and that are inexpensive to use; we refer to this group of strategies as 'adjustments'. Adjustment schemes of various kinds were identified for us by agricultural experts in the Missouri-Iowa-Nebraska-Kansas (MINK) states. These can involve changes in land use, changes in variety and crop selection, changes in planting and harvesting practices, and changes in fertility and pest management. Using the erosion productivity impact calculator (EPIC) model on a small set of representative farms, we tested adjustments of these kinds. The simulations show that earlier planting, longer-season cultivars and the use of furrow diking for moisture conservation would offset some of the yield losses induced by climate change in warm-season crops. Longer-season varieties of wheat (a cool-season crop) and shorter-season varieties of the perennials wheatgrass and alfalfa were also effective. The adjustments to climate change diminished yield losses in all crops but irrigated wheat. Despite the positive effects of adjustments, however, yields of all dryland warm-season crops remained lower than control levels. The adjustments also increased demand for irrigation water. Carbon dioxide enrichment had the same incremental effect on crop yields with or without adjustments (see the fourth paper in this issue), except in the case of alfalfa and sorghum, where a CO2-adjustment interaction was found. We conclude that currently available techniques would partially offset the yield reductions caused by a 1930s-like climate, but that in most crops the yield reductions would still be substantial.

AB - If climate changes, farmers will have to adapt to a new set of climate constraints. In this paper we examine the efficacy of strategies for dealing with climate change that are currently available to farmers and that are inexpensive to use; we refer to this group of strategies as 'adjustments'. Adjustment schemes of various kinds were identified for us by agricultural experts in the Missouri-Iowa-Nebraska-Kansas (MINK) states. These can involve changes in land use, changes in variety and crop selection, changes in planting and harvesting practices, and changes in fertility and pest management. Using the erosion productivity impact calculator (EPIC) model on a small set of representative farms, we tested adjustments of these kinds. The simulations show that earlier planting, longer-season cultivars and the use of furrow diking for moisture conservation would offset some of the yield losses induced by climate change in warm-season crops. Longer-season varieties of wheat (a cool-season crop) and shorter-season varieties of the perennials wheatgrass and alfalfa were also effective. The adjustments to climate change diminished yield losses in all crops but irrigated wheat. Despite the positive effects of adjustments, however, yields of all dryland warm-season crops remained lower than control levels. The adjustments also increased demand for irrigation water. Carbon dioxide enrichment had the same incremental effect on crop yields with or without adjustments (see the fourth paper in this issue), except in the case of alfalfa and sorghum, where a CO2-adjustment interaction was found. We conclude that currently available techniques would partially offset the yield reductions caused by a 1930s-like climate, but that in most crops the yield reductions would still be substantial.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026475622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026475622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0168-1923(92)90087-K

DO - 10.1016/0168-1923(92)90087-K

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0026475622

VL - 59

SP - 75

EP - 102

JO - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

JF - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

SN - 0168-1923

IS - 1-2

ER -