Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

George A. Williams, Ingrid Scott, Julia A. Haller, Albert M. Maguire, Dennis Marcus, H. Richard McDonald

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

164 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To evaluate whether single-field fundus photography can be used as a screening tool to identify diabetic retinopathy for referral for further ophthalmic care. Methods A MEDLINE search of the peer-reviewed literature was conducted in June 2001 for the years 1968 to 2001 and updated in September 2003, yielding 145 articles. The search was limited to articles published in English. The Cochrane Library of clinical trials was also investigated. The authors reviewed the abstracts of these articles and selected 63 of possible clinical relevance for review by the panel. Of these 63 articles, the panel selected 32 for the panel methodologist to review and rate according to the strength of evidence. Results Three of the 32 articles reviewed were classified as level I evidence, and 4 were classified as level II evidence. Evidence from level I studies demonstrates that as a tool to detect vision-threatening retinopathy, single-field fundus photography interpreted by trained readers has sensitivity ranging from 61% to 90% and specificity ranging from 85% to 97% when compared with the gold standard reference of stereophotographs of 7 standard fields. When compared with dilated ophthalmoscopy by an ophthalmologist, single-field fundus photography has sensitivity ranging from 38% to 100% and specificity ranging from 75% to 100%. Conclusions Single-field fundus photography is not a substitute for a comprehensive ophthalmic examination, but there is level I evidence that it can serve as a screening tool for diabetic retinopathy to identify patients with retinopathy for referral for ophthalmic evaluation and management. The advantages of single-field fundus photography interpreted by trained readers are ease of use (only one photograph is required), convenience, and ability to detect retinopathy. Further studies will be required to assess the implementation of single-field photography-based programs to confirm the clinical and cost-effectiveness of these techniques in improving population visual outcomes. Future research also should include establishing standardized protocols and satisfactory performance standards for diabetic retinopathy screening programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1055-1062
Number of pages8
JournalOphthalmology
Volume111
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2004

Fingerprint

Photography
Diabetic Retinopathy
Referral and Consultation
Ophthalmoscopy
Aptitude
MEDLINE
Libraries
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Clinical Trials
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Williams, George A. ; Scott, Ingrid ; Haller, Julia A. ; Maguire, Albert M. ; Marcus, Dennis ; McDonald, H. Richard. / Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening : A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. In: Ophthalmology. 2004 ; Vol. 111, No. 5. pp. 1055-1062.
@article{8f83058623984212b2101b32616962f7,
title = "Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology",
abstract = "Objective To evaluate whether single-field fundus photography can be used as a screening tool to identify diabetic retinopathy for referral for further ophthalmic care. Methods A MEDLINE search of the peer-reviewed literature was conducted in June 2001 for the years 1968 to 2001 and updated in September 2003, yielding 145 articles. The search was limited to articles published in English. The Cochrane Library of clinical trials was also investigated. The authors reviewed the abstracts of these articles and selected 63 of possible clinical relevance for review by the panel. Of these 63 articles, the panel selected 32 for the panel methodologist to review and rate according to the strength of evidence. Results Three of the 32 articles reviewed were classified as level I evidence, and 4 were classified as level II evidence. Evidence from level I studies demonstrates that as a tool to detect vision-threatening retinopathy, single-field fundus photography interpreted by trained readers has sensitivity ranging from 61{\%} to 90{\%} and specificity ranging from 85{\%} to 97{\%} when compared with the gold standard reference of stereophotographs of 7 standard fields. When compared with dilated ophthalmoscopy by an ophthalmologist, single-field fundus photography has sensitivity ranging from 38{\%} to 100{\%} and specificity ranging from 75{\%} to 100{\%}. Conclusions Single-field fundus photography is not a substitute for a comprehensive ophthalmic examination, but there is level I evidence that it can serve as a screening tool for diabetic retinopathy to identify patients with retinopathy for referral for ophthalmic evaluation and management. The advantages of single-field fundus photography interpreted by trained readers are ease of use (only one photograph is required), convenience, and ability to detect retinopathy. Further studies will be required to assess the implementation of single-field photography-based programs to confirm the clinical and cost-effectiveness of these techniques in improving population visual outcomes. Future research also should include establishing standardized protocols and satisfactory performance standards for diabetic retinopathy screening programs.",
author = "Williams, {George A.} and Ingrid Scott and Haller, {Julia A.} and Maguire, {Albert M.} and Dennis Marcus and McDonald, {H. Richard}",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.02.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "111",
pages = "1055--1062",
journal = "Ophthalmology",
issn = "0161-6420",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening : A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. / Williams, George A.; Scott, Ingrid; Haller, Julia A.; Maguire, Albert M.; Marcus, Dennis; McDonald, H. Richard.

In: Ophthalmology, Vol. 111, No. 5, 01.05.2004, p. 1055-1062.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening

T2 - A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

AU - Williams, George A.

AU - Scott, Ingrid

AU - Haller, Julia A.

AU - Maguire, Albert M.

AU - Marcus, Dennis

AU - McDonald, H. Richard

PY - 2004/5/1

Y1 - 2004/5/1

N2 - Objective To evaluate whether single-field fundus photography can be used as a screening tool to identify diabetic retinopathy for referral for further ophthalmic care. Methods A MEDLINE search of the peer-reviewed literature was conducted in June 2001 for the years 1968 to 2001 and updated in September 2003, yielding 145 articles. The search was limited to articles published in English. The Cochrane Library of clinical trials was also investigated. The authors reviewed the abstracts of these articles and selected 63 of possible clinical relevance for review by the panel. Of these 63 articles, the panel selected 32 for the panel methodologist to review and rate according to the strength of evidence. Results Three of the 32 articles reviewed were classified as level I evidence, and 4 were classified as level II evidence. Evidence from level I studies demonstrates that as a tool to detect vision-threatening retinopathy, single-field fundus photography interpreted by trained readers has sensitivity ranging from 61% to 90% and specificity ranging from 85% to 97% when compared with the gold standard reference of stereophotographs of 7 standard fields. When compared with dilated ophthalmoscopy by an ophthalmologist, single-field fundus photography has sensitivity ranging from 38% to 100% and specificity ranging from 75% to 100%. Conclusions Single-field fundus photography is not a substitute for a comprehensive ophthalmic examination, but there is level I evidence that it can serve as a screening tool for diabetic retinopathy to identify patients with retinopathy for referral for ophthalmic evaluation and management. The advantages of single-field fundus photography interpreted by trained readers are ease of use (only one photograph is required), convenience, and ability to detect retinopathy. Further studies will be required to assess the implementation of single-field photography-based programs to confirm the clinical and cost-effectiveness of these techniques in improving population visual outcomes. Future research also should include establishing standardized protocols and satisfactory performance standards for diabetic retinopathy screening programs.

AB - Objective To evaluate whether single-field fundus photography can be used as a screening tool to identify diabetic retinopathy for referral for further ophthalmic care. Methods A MEDLINE search of the peer-reviewed literature was conducted in June 2001 for the years 1968 to 2001 and updated in September 2003, yielding 145 articles. The search was limited to articles published in English. The Cochrane Library of clinical trials was also investigated. The authors reviewed the abstracts of these articles and selected 63 of possible clinical relevance for review by the panel. Of these 63 articles, the panel selected 32 for the panel methodologist to review and rate according to the strength of evidence. Results Three of the 32 articles reviewed were classified as level I evidence, and 4 were classified as level II evidence. Evidence from level I studies demonstrates that as a tool to detect vision-threatening retinopathy, single-field fundus photography interpreted by trained readers has sensitivity ranging from 61% to 90% and specificity ranging from 85% to 97% when compared with the gold standard reference of stereophotographs of 7 standard fields. When compared with dilated ophthalmoscopy by an ophthalmologist, single-field fundus photography has sensitivity ranging from 38% to 100% and specificity ranging from 75% to 100%. Conclusions Single-field fundus photography is not a substitute for a comprehensive ophthalmic examination, but there is level I evidence that it can serve as a screening tool for diabetic retinopathy to identify patients with retinopathy for referral for ophthalmic evaluation and management. The advantages of single-field fundus photography interpreted by trained readers are ease of use (only one photograph is required), convenience, and ability to detect retinopathy. Further studies will be required to assess the implementation of single-field photography-based programs to confirm the clinical and cost-effectiveness of these techniques in improving population visual outcomes. Future research also should include establishing standardized protocols and satisfactory performance standards for diabetic retinopathy screening programs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2342637174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2342637174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.02.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.02.004

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15121388

AN - SCOPUS:2342637174

VL - 111

SP - 1055

EP - 1062

JO - Ophthalmology

JF - Ophthalmology

SN - 0161-6420

IS - 5

ER -