Single-site Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Provides Similar Lengths of Hospital Stay and Similar Costs Compared with Standard Laparoscopy: Results of a Retrospective Cohort Study

David B. Stewart, Arthur Berg, Evangelos Messaris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The present study sought to compare the length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs for elective single-site (SSL) and standard laparoscopic (SDL) colorectal resections performed at a tertiary referral center. Methods: An IRB-approved, retrospective cohort study of all elective SDL and SSL colorectal resections performed from 2008 to 2012 was undertaken. Patient charges and inflation adjusted hospital costs (US dollars) were compared with costs subcategorized by operating room expense, room and board, and pharmacy and radiology utilization. Results: A total of 149 SDL and 111 SSL cases were identified. Compared with SSL, SDL surgeries were associated with longer median operative times (SSL: 153 min vs. SDL: 189 min, p = 0.001); however, median operating room costs were similar (p > 0.05). Median postoperative LOS was similar for both groups (SSL: 3 days; SDL: 4 days; p > 0.05). There was no difference between SSL and SDL with respect to either total patient charges (SSL: $34,847 vs. SDL: $38,306; p > 0.05) or hospital costs (SSL: $13,051vs. SDL: $12,703; p > 0.05). Median costs during readmission were lower for SSL patients (SSL: $3,625 vs. SDL: $6,203, p = 0.04). Conclusions: SSL provides similar LOS as well as similar costs to both patients and hospitals compared with SDL, making it a cost-feasible alternative.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)774-781
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2014

Fingerprint

Colorectal Surgery
Laparoscopy
Length of Stay
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Costs and Cost Analysis
Hospital Costs
Operating Rooms
Research Ethics Committees
Economic Inflation
Operative Time
Radiology
Tertiary Care Centers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

@article{3f9474d86050482097216064d33a86e1,
title = "Single-site Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Provides Similar Lengths of Hospital Stay and Similar Costs Compared with Standard Laparoscopy: Results of a Retrospective Cohort Study",
abstract = "Background: The present study sought to compare the length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs for elective single-site (SSL) and standard laparoscopic (SDL) colorectal resections performed at a tertiary referral center. Methods: An IRB-approved, retrospective cohort study of all elective SDL and SSL colorectal resections performed from 2008 to 2012 was undertaken. Patient charges and inflation adjusted hospital costs (US dollars) were compared with costs subcategorized by operating room expense, room and board, and pharmacy and radiology utilization. Results: A total of 149 SDL and 111 SSL cases were identified. Compared with SSL, SDL surgeries were associated with longer median operative times (SSL: 153 min vs. SDL: 189 min, p = 0.001); however, median operating room costs were similar (p > 0.05). Median postoperative LOS was similar for both groups (SSL: 3 days; SDL: 4 days; p > 0.05). There was no difference between SSL and SDL with respect to either total patient charges (SSL: $34,847 vs. SDL: $38,306; p > 0.05) or hospital costs (SSL: $13,051vs. SDL: $12,703; p > 0.05). Median costs during readmission were lower for SSL patients (SSL: $3,625 vs. SDL: $6,203, p = 0.04). Conclusions: SSL provides similar LOS as well as similar costs to both patients and hospitals compared with SDL, making it a cost-feasible alternative.",
author = "Stewart, {David B.} and Arthur Berg and Evangelos Messaris",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s11605-013-2438-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "774--781",
journal = "Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery",
issn = "1091-255X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Single-site Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Provides Similar Lengths of Hospital Stay and Similar Costs Compared with Standard Laparoscopy

T2 - Results of a Retrospective Cohort Study

AU - Stewart, David B.

AU - Berg, Arthur

AU - Messaris, Evangelos

PY - 2014/4

Y1 - 2014/4

N2 - Background: The present study sought to compare the length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs for elective single-site (SSL) and standard laparoscopic (SDL) colorectal resections performed at a tertiary referral center. Methods: An IRB-approved, retrospective cohort study of all elective SDL and SSL colorectal resections performed from 2008 to 2012 was undertaken. Patient charges and inflation adjusted hospital costs (US dollars) were compared with costs subcategorized by operating room expense, room and board, and pharmacy and radiology utilization. Results: A total of 149 SDL and 111 SSL cases were identified. Compared with SSL, SDL surgeries were associated with longer median operative times (SSL: 153 min vs. SDL: 189 min, p = 0.001); however, median operating room costs were similar (p > 0.05). Median postoperative LOS was similar for both groups (SSL: 3 days; SDL: 4 days; p > 0.05). There was no difference between SSL and SDL with respect to either total patient charges (SSL: $34,847 vs. SDL: $38,306; p > 0.05) or hospital costs (SSL: $13,051vs. SDL: $12,703; p > 0.05). Median costs during readmission were lower for SSL patients (SSL: $3,625 vs. SDL: $6,203, p = 0.04). Conclusions: SSL provides similar LOS as well as similar costs to both patients and hospitals compared with SDL, making it a cost-feasible alternative.

AB - Background: The present study sought to compare the length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs for elective single-site (SSL) and standard laparoscopic (SDL) colorectal resections performed at a tertiary referral center. Methods: An IRB-approved, retrospective cohort study of all elective SDL and SSL colorectal resections performed from 2008 to 2012 was undertaken. Patient charges and inflation adjusted hospital costs (US dollars) were compared with costs subcategorized by operating room expense, room and board, and pharmacy and radiology utilization. Results: A total of 149 SDL and 111 SSL cases were identified. Compared with SSL, SDL surgeries were associated with longer median operative times (SSL: 153 min vs. SDL: 189 min, p = 0.001); however, median operating room costs were similar (p > 0.05). Median postoperative LOS was similar for both groups (SSL: 3 days; SDL: 4 days; p > 0.05). There was no difference between SSL and SDL with respect to either total patient charges (SSL: $34,847 vs. SDL: $38,306; p > 0.05) or hospital costs (SSL: $13,051vs. SDL: $12,703; p > 0.05). Median costs during readmission were lower for SSL patients (SSL: $3,625 vs. SDL: $6,203, p = 0.04). Conclusions: SSL provides similar LOS as well as similar costs to both patients and hospitals compared with SDL, making it a cost-feasible alternative.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896549054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896549054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11605-013-2438-4

DO - 10.1007/s11605-013-2438-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 24408181

AN - SCOPUS:84896549054

VL - 18

SP - 774

EP - 781

JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

SN - 1091-255X

IS - 4

ER -