Skill deficit or differential motivation? - Testing alternative explanations for gender differences in the provision of emotional support

Erina Lynne Macgeorge, Seth J. Gillihan, Wendy Samter, Ruth Anne Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although researchers have proposed a skill deficit account for observed gender differences in the provision of emotional support, few studies have directly tested the claim that men are less capable of providing effective support. This study advances an alternative account for gender differences in the effectiveness of supportive communication, arguing that gender differences may emerge because men and women respond differently to situational factors that influence the motivation to provide sensitive emotional support. Participants produced emotional support messages in response to scenarios varying in target gender, target responsibility for theproblem, and target effort to resolve the problem, as well as in response to the problem itself (a replication factor included to increase generalizability). Women produced messages exhibiting greater emotional sensitivity than those of men across the other factors examined, providing support for the skill deficit account and failing to provide evidence of differential motivation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)272-303
Number of pages32
JournalCommunication Research
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2003

Fingerprint

gender-specific factors
deficit
Testing
Communication
scenario
responsibility
communication
gender
evidence
Gender Differences
Emotion

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{811bdeb8c7d34d50b3316e045ac0cf22,
title = "Skill deficit or differential motivation? - Testing alternative explanations for gender differences in the provision of emotional support",
abstract = "Although researchers have proposed a skill deficit account for observed gender differences in the provision of emotional support, few studies have directly tested the claim that men are less capable of providing effective support. This study advances an alternative account for gender differences in the effectiveness of supportive communication, arguing that gender differences may emerge because men and women respond differently to situational factors that influence the motivation to provide sensitive emotional support. Participants produced emotional support messages in response to scenarios varying in target gender, target responsibility for theproblem, and target effort to resolve the problem, as well as in response to the problem itself (a replication factor included to increase generalizability). Women produced messages exhibiting greater emotional sensitivity than those of men across the other factors examined, providing support for the skill deficit account and failing to provide evidence of differential motivation.",
author = "Macgeorge, {Erina Lynne} and Gillihan, {Seth J.} and Wendy Samter and Clark, {Ruth Anne}",
year = "2003",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0093650203030003002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "272--303",
journal = "Communication Research",
issn = "0093-6502",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Skill deficit or differential motivation? - Testing alternative explanations for gender differences in the provision of emotional support. / Macgeorge, Erina Lynne; Gillihan, Seth J.; Samter, Wendy; Clark, Ruth Anne.

In: Communication Research, Vol. 30, No. 3, 01.06.2003, p. 272-303.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Skill deficit or differential motivation? - Testing alternative explanations for gender differences in the provision of emotional support

AU - Macgeorge, Erina Lynne

AU - Gillihan, Seth J.

AU - Samter, Wendy

AU - Clark, Ruth Anne

PY - 2003/6/1

Y1 - 2003/6/1

N2 - Although researchers have proposed a skill deficit account for observed gender differences in the provision of emotional support, few studies have directly tested the claim that men are less capable of providing effective support. This study advances an alternative account for gender differences in the effectiveness of supportive communication, arguing that gender differences may emerge because men and women respond differently to situational factors that influence the motivation to provide sensitive emotional support. Participants produced emotional support messages in response to scenarios varying in target gender, target responsibility for theproblem, and target effort to resolve the problem, as well as in response to the problem itself (a replication factor included to increase generalizability). Women produced messages exhibiting greater emotional sensitivity than those of men across the other factors examined, providing support for the skill deficit account and failing to provide evidence of differential motivation.

AB - Although researchers have proposed a skill deficit account for observed gender differences in the provision of emotional support, few studies have directly tested the claim that men are less capable of providing effective support. This study advances an alternative account for gender differences in the effectiveness of supportive communication, arguing that gender differences may emerge because men and women respond differently to situational factors that influence the motivation to provide sensitive emotional support. Participants produced emotional support messages in response to scenarios varying in target gender, target responsibility for theproblem, and target effort to resolve the problem, as well as in response to the problem itself (a replication factor included to increase generalizability). Women produced messages exhibiting greater emotional sensitivity than those of men across the other factors examined, providing support for the skill deficit account and failing to provide evidence of differential motivation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037618842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037618842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0093650203030003002

DO - 10.1177/0093650203030003002

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 272

EP - 303

JO - Communication Research

JF - Communication Research

SN - 0093-6502

IS - 3

ER -