Sleep in the modern family: Protective family routines for child and adolescent sleep

Orfeu M. Buxton, Anne-Marie Chang, James C. Spilsbury, Taylor Bos, Helene Emsellem, Kristen L. Knutson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objectives: The overall objective of the 2014 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America Poll "Sleep in the Modern Family" was to obtain a current picture of sleep in families with at least 1 school-aged child. Design: Cross-sectional poll. Setting: Internet-based interview. Participants: Nationally representative Internet panel of US households with a child 6-17 years. Measurements and results: Primary measures included parental perception of the importance of sleep, parental and child sleep quality, child sleep duration and habits, technology in bedroom, and family rules. Parents/guardians (n = 1103; mean age, 42; 54% female) completed the survey. Although the majority of parents endorsed the importance of sleep, 90% of children obtain less sleep than recommended. Significant predictors of age-adjusted sufficient sleep duration (estimated conservatively as ≥ 9 hours for ages 6-11 years and ≥ 8 hours for ages 12-17 years) included parent education, regular enforcement of rules about caffeine, and whether children left technology on in their bedroom overnight. Significant predictors of excellent sleep quality included whether a bedtime was always enforced and whether children left technology on overnight. Conclusions: Children generally have better age-appropriate sleep in the presence of household rules and regular sleep-wake routines. Sufficient sleep quantity and adequate sleep quality were protected by well-established rules of sleep hygiene (limited caffeine and regular bedtime). In contrast, sleep deficiency was more likely to be present when parents and children had electronic devices on in the bedroom after bedtime. Public health intervention goals for sleep health might focus on reducing the encroachment of technology and media into time for sleep and supporting well-known sleep hygiene principles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-27
Number of pages13
JournalSleep health
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

Fingerprint

Sleep
Technology
Parents
Caffeine
Internet
Habits
Public Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Buxton, Orfeu M. ; Chang, Anne-Marie ; Spilsbury, James C. ; Bos, Taylor ; Emsellem, Helene ; Knutson, Kristen L. / Sleep in the modern family : Protective family routines for child and adolescent sleep. In: Sleep health. 2015 ; Vol. 1, No. 1. pp. 15-27.
@article{13d3bef49705436981c110b1ffa68979,
title = "Sleep in the modern family: Protective family routines for child and adolescent sleep",
abstract = "Study objectives: The overall objective of the 2014 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America Poll {"}Sleep in the Modern Family{"} was to obtain a current picture of sleep in families with at least 1 school-aged child. Design: Cross-sectional poll. Setting: Internet-based interview. Participants: Nationally representative Internet panel of US households with a child 6-17 years. Measurements and results: Primary measures included parental perception of the importance of sleep, parental and child sleep quality, child sleep duration and habits, technology in bedroom, and family rules. Parents/guardians (n = 1103; mean age, 42; 54{\%} female) completed the survey. Although the majority of parents endorsed the importance of sleep, 90{\%} of children obtain less sleep than recommended. Significant predictors of age-adjusted sufficient sleep duration (estimated conservatively as ≥ 9 hours for ages 6-11 years and ≥ 8 hours for ages 12-17 years) included parent education, regular enforcement of rules about caffeine, and whether children left technology on in their bedroom overnight. Significant predictors of excellent sleep quality included whether a bedtime was always enforced and whether children left technology on overnight. Conclusions: Children generally have better age-appropriate sleep in the presence of household rules and regular sleep-wake routines. Sufficient sleep quantity and adequate sleep quality were protected by well-established rules of sleep hygiene (limited caffeine and regular bedtime). In contrast, sleep deficiency was more likely to be present when parents and children had electronic devices on in the bedroom after bedtime. Public health intervention goals for sleep health might focus on reducing the encroachment of technology and media into time for sleep and supporting well-known sleep hygiene principles.",
author = "Buxton, {Orfeu M.} and Anne-Marie Chang and Spilsbury, {James C.} and Taylor Bos and Helene Emsellem and Knutson, {Kristen L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.sleh.2014.12.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "15--27",
journal = "Sleep Health",
issn = "2352-7218",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Sleep in the modern family : Protective family routines for child and adolescent sleep. / Buxton, Orfeu M.; Chang, Anne-Marie; Spilsbury, James C.; Bos, Taylor; Emsellem, Helene; Knutson, Kristen L.

In: Sleep health, Vol. 1, No. 1, 01.03.2015, p. 15-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sleep in the modern family

T2 - Protective family routines for child and adolescent sleep

AU - Buxton, Orfeu M.

AU - Chang, Anne-Marie

AU - Spilsbury, James C.

AU - Bos, Taylor

AU - Emsellem, Helene

AU - Knutson, Kristen L.

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Study objectives: The overall objective of the 2014 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America Poll "Sleep in the Modern Family" was to obtain a current picture of sleep in families with at least 1 school-aged child. Design: Cross-sectional poll. Setting: Internet-based interview. Participants: Nationally representative Internet panel of US households with a child 6-17 years. Measurements and results: Primary measures included parental perception of the importance of sleep, parental and child sleep quality, child sleep duration and habits, technology in bedroom, and family rules. Parents/guardians (n = 1103; mean age, 42; 54% female) completed the survey. Although the majority of parents endorsed the importance of sleep, 90% of children obtain less sleep than recommended. Significant predictors of age-adjusted sufficient sleep duration (estimated conservatively as ≥ 9 hours for ages 6-11 years and ≥ 8 hours for ages 12-17 years) included parent education, regular enforcement of rules about caffeine, and whether children left technology on in their bedroom overnight. Significant predictors of excellent sleep quality included whether a bedtime was always enforced and whether children left technology on overnight. Conclusions: Children generally have better age-appropriate sleep in the presence of household rules and regular sleep-wake routines. Sufficient sleep quantity and adequate sleep quality were protected by well-established rules of sleep hygiene (limited caffeine and regular bedtime). In contrast, sleep deficiency was more likely to be present when parents and children had electronic devices on in the bedroom after bedtime. Public health intervention goals for sleep health might focus on reducing the encroachment of technology and media into time for sleep and supporting well-known sleep hygiene principles.

AB - Study objectives: The overall objective of the 2014 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America Poll "Sleep in the Modern Family" was to obtain a current picture of sleep in families with at least 1 school-aged child. Design: Cross-sectional poll. Setting: Internet-based interview. Participants: Nationally representative Internet panel of US households with a child 6-17 years. Measurements and results: Primary measures included parental perception of the importance of sleep, parental and child sleep quality, child sleep duration and habits, technology in bedroom, and family rules. Parents/guardians (n = 1103; mean age, 42; 54% female) completed the survey. Although the majority of parents endorsed the importance of sleep, 90% of children obtain less sleep than recommended. Significant predictors of age-adjusted sufficient sleep duration (estimated conservatively as ≥ 9 hours for ages 6-11 years and ≥ 8 hours for ages 12-17 years) included parent education, regular enforcement of rules about caffeine, and whether children left technology on in their bedroom overnight. Significant predictors of excellent sleep quality included whether a bedtime was always enforced and whether children left technology on overnight. Conclusions: Children generally have better age-appropriate sleep in the presence of household rules and regular sleep-wake routines. Sufficient sleep quantity and adequate sleep quality were protected by well-established rules of sleep hygiene (limited caffeine and regular bedtime). In contrast, sleep deficiency was more likely to be present when parents and children had electronic devices on in the bedroom after bedtime. Public health intervention goals for sleep health might focus on reducing the encroachment of technology and media into time for sleep and supporting well-known sleep hygiene principles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928196160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928196160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.sleh.2014.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.sleh.2014.12.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928196160

VL - 1

SP - 15

EP - 27

JO - Sleep Health

JF - Sleep Health

SN - 2352-7218

IS - 1

ER -