Slow wave potentials in cucumber differ in form and growth effect from those in pea seedlings

Rainer Stahlberg, Daniel J. Cosgrove

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A positive hydraulic signal in the form of a xylem pressure step was applied to the roots of intact seedlings of Cucumis sativus L. and Pisum sativum L. Surface electrodes at three positions along the epicotyl/hypocotyl recorded a propagating depolarization which appeared first in the basal, then the central and sometimes the apical electrode positions and fitted the characteristics of a slow wave potential (SWP). This depolarization differed between pea and cucumber. It was transient in cells of pea epicotyls but sustained in cucumber hypocotyls. It was not associated with a change in cell input resistance in pea epicotyls but preceded an increase in the input resistance of cucumber hypocotyl cells. With the increased xylem pressure the growth rate (GR) of cucumber hypocotyls and pea epicotyls underwent a transient increase peaking after 5 min. If the depolarization reached the growing upper region, it preceded a sustained decrease in the GR of cucumber hypocotyls but only a transient decrease in the GR of pea epicotyls. A temperature jump in the root medium (heat treatment) induced a steep pressure spike in the xylem of the cucumber hypocotyl which showed similar electric and growth effects as the previously applied, non-injurious pressure steps. We suggest that the observed differences in the electric and growth responses between the species were caused by the closure of ion channels in depolarized cells of cucumber but not pea seedlings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)379-388
Number of pages10
JournalPhysiologia Plantarum
Volume101
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Cucumis sativus
Peas
Seedlings
Hypocotyl
cucumbers
epicotyls
peas
hypocotyls
seedlings
Growth
Xylem
xylem
Pressure
electrodes
Electrodes
cells
ion channels
Pisum sativum
Ion Channels
fluid mechanics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Plant Science

Cite this

@article{ac52c02641cf4c95848f0e592749680c,
title = "Slow wave potentials in cucumber differ in form and growth effect from those in pea seedlings",
abstract = "A positive hydraulic signal in the form of a xylem pressure step was applied to the roots of intact seedlings of Cucumis sativus L. and Pisum sativum L. Surface electrodes at three positions along the epicotyl/hypocotyl recorded a propagating depolarization which appeared first in the basal, then the central and sometimes the apical electrode positions and fitted the characteristics of a slow wave potential (SWP). This depolarization differed between pea and cucumber. It was transient in cells of pea epicotyls but sustained in cucumber hypocotyls. It was not associated with a change in cell input resistance in pea epicotyls but preceded an increase in the input resistance of cucumber hypocotyl cells. With the increased xylem pressure the growth rate (GR) of cucumber hypocotyls and pea epicotyls underwent a transient increase peaking after 5 min. If the depolarization reached the growing upper region, it preceded a sustained decrease in the GR of cucumber hypocotyls but only a transient decrease in the GR of pea epicotyls. A temperature jump in the root medium (heat treatment) induced a steep pressure spike in the xylem of the cucumber hypocotyl which showed similar electric and growth effects as the previously applied, non-injurious pressure steps. We suggest that the observed differences in the electric and growth responses between the species were caused by the closure of ion channels in depolarized cells of cucumber but not pea seedlings.",
author = "Rainer Stahlberg and Cosgrove, {Daniel J.}",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1034/j.1399-3054.1997.1010219.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "379--388",
journal = "Physiologia Plantarum",
issn = "0031-9317",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Slow wave potentials in cucumber differ in form and growth effect from those in pea seedlings. / Stahlberg, Rainer; Cosgrove, Daniel J.

In: Physiologia Plantarum, Vol. 101, No. 2, 1997, p. 379-388.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Slow wave potentials in cucumber differ in form and growth effect from those in pea seedlings

AU - Stahlberg, Rainer

AU - Cosgrove, Daniel J.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - A positive hydraulic signal in the form of a xylem pressure step was applied to the roots of intact seedlings of Cucumis sativus L. and Pisum sativum L. Surface electrodes at three positions along the epicotyl/hypocotyl recorded a propagating depolarization which appeared first in the basal, then the central and sometimes the apical electrode positions and fitted the characteristics of a slow wave potential (SWP). This depolarization differed between pea and cucumber. It was transient in cells of pea epicotyls but sustained in cucumber hypocotyls. It was not associated with a change in cell input resistance in pea epicotyls but preceded an increase in the input resistance of cucumber hypocotyl cells. With the increased xylem pressure the growth rate (GR) of cucumber hypocotyls and pea epicotyls underwent a transient increase peaking after 5 min. If the depolarization reached the growing upper region, it preceded a sustained decrease in the GR of cucumber hypocotyls but only a transient decrease in the GR of pea epicotyls. A temperature jump in the root medium (heat treatment) induced a steep pressure spike in the xylem of the cucumber hypocotyl which showed similar electric and growth effects as the previously applied, non-injurious pressure steps. We suggest that the observed differences in the electric and growth responses between the species were caused by the closure of ion channels in depolarized cells of cucumber but not pea seedlings.

AB - A positive hydraulic signal in the form of a xylem pressure step was applied to the roots of intact seedlings of Cucumis sativus L. and Pisum sativum L. Surface electrodes at three positions along the epicotyl/hypocotyl recorded a propagating depolarization which appeared first in the basal, then the central and sometimes the apical electrode positions and fitted the characteristics of a slow wave potential (SWP). This depolarization differed between pea and cucumber. It was transient in cells of pea epicotyls but sustained in cucumber hypocotyls. It was not associated with a change in cell input resistance in pea epicotyls but preceded an increase in the input resistance of cucumber hypocotyl cells. With the increased xylem pressure the growth rate (GR) of cucumber hypocotyls and pea epicotyls underwent a transient increase peaking after 5 min. If the depolarization reached the growing upper region, it preceded a sustained decrease in the GR of cucumber hypocotyls but only a transient decrease in the GR of pea epicotyls. A temperature jump in the root medium (heat treatment) induced a steep pressure spike in the xylem of the cucumber hypocotyl which showed similar electric and growth effects as the previously applied, non-injurious pressure steps. We suggest that the observed differences in the electric and growth responses between the species were caused by the closure of ion channels in depolarized cells of cucumber but not pea seedlings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030880241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030880241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1997.1010219.x

DO - 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1997.1010219.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030880241

VL - 101

SP - 379

EP - 388

JO - Physiologia Plantarum

JF - Physiologia Plantarum

SN - 0031-9317

IS - 2

ER -