Smoking in pregnancy and fetal growth: The case for more intensive assessment

Shannon Shisler, Rina D. Eiden, Danielle S. Molnar, Pamela Schuetze, Marilyn Huestis, Gregory Homish

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Many studies on prenatal tobacco exposure (PTE) effects have relied on single item retrospective measures of PTE. However, it is unclear how these single item measures may relate to more intensive maternal self-reports and to biological markers of maternal use and/or fetal exposure. It is also unclear whether these measures may be more valid predictors of fetal growth (gestational age, birthweight, head circumference, and birth length). Methods: Data were obtained from 258 women during their pregnancy. PTE was assessed by four methods: a single item question, a calendar-based self-report measure from each trimester of pregnancy, maternal salivary cotinine assays, and nicotine and metabolites in infant meconium. We hypothesized that the more intensive measures and biological assays would account for additional variance in birth outcomes, above and beyond the single item measure. Results: The single item self-report measure was not related to fetal growth. However, the more intensive calendar based self-report measure and the biological assays of PTE (ie, maternal salivary assays and infant meconium) were significant predictors of poor fetal growth, even with the single item measure in the model. Conclusions: The negative effects of PTE on important child outcomes may be greatly underestimated in the literature as many studies use single item self-report measures to ascertain PTE. Whereas more intensive self-report measures or biological assays may be cost prohibitive in large scale epidemiological studies, using a combination of measures when possible should be considered given their superiority both identifying prenatal smokers and predicting poor fetal growth. Implications: The present work underscores the importance of measurement issues when assessing associations between PTE and fetal growth. Results suggest that we may be greatly underestimating the negative effects of prenatal smoking on fetal growth and other important child outcomes if we rely solely on restricted single item self-report measures of prenatal smoking. Researchers should consider more intensive prospective self-report measures and biological assays as viable and superior alternatives to single item self-report measures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)525-531
Number of pages7
JournalNicotine and Tobacco Research
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Smoking in pregnancy and fetal growth: The case for more intensive assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this