Social comparisons in adults with type 2 diabetes: Patients’ reasons for target selection

Danielle Arigo, Max Cornell, Joshua Morrison Smyth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To examine reasons for selecting a social comparison target (i.e. a specific other for relative self-evaluation), and their influence on affect and motivation for self-care, in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Design: Adults with T2DM (n = 180, MA1c = 7.6%) chose to read about one of four targets. Participants rated five reasons for their choice (strongly disagree–strongly agree), and rated affect and self-care motivation before and after reading. Results:To boost confidence in my ability to manage diabetes was rated highest overall (ps < 0.01), though choosing worse-off (vs. better-off) targets was associated with to gain useful information about how to improve (p = 0.04, (Formula presented.) = 0.05). Selection in order to feel better worked for those who chose better-off targets; choosing worse-off targets for this purpose worsened mood and stress (ps < 0.04, (Formula presented.) s = 0.02). Choosing worse-off targets to learn about similar others reduced self-care motivation (p < 0.01, (Formula presented.) = 0.05). Selection in order to boost confidence showed increased motivation only among those who chose better-off targets (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Patients’ reasons for a particular comparison are associated with short-term changes in affect and self-care motivation, and warrant greater empirical and clinical attention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)906-924
Number of pages19
JournalPsychology and Health
Volume33
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 3 2018

Fingerprint

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Motivation
Self Care
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Aptitude
Reading

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Applied Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{1eaf5a2f589e493d84a7f180b056e0b7,
title = "Social comparisons in adults with type 2 diabetes: Patients’ reasons for target selection",
abstract = "Objective: To examine reasons for selecting a social comparison target (i.e. a specific other for relative self-evaluation), and their influence on affect and motivation for self-care, in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Design: Adults with T2DM (n = 180, MA1c = 7.6{\%}) chose to read about one of four targets. Participants rated five reasons for their choice (strongly disagree–strongly agree), and rated affect and self-care motivation before and after reading. Results:To boost confidence in my ability to manage diabetes was rated highest overall (ps < 0.01), though choosing worse-off (vs. better-off) targets was associated with to gain useful information about how to improve (p = 0.04, (Formula presented.) = 0.05). Selection in order to feel better worked for those who chose better-off targets; choosing worse-off targets for this purpose worsened mood and stress (ps < 0.04, (Formula presented.) s = 0.02). Choosing worse-off targets to learn about similar others reduced self-care motivation (p < 0.01, (Formula presented.) = 0.05). Selection in order to boost confidence showed increased motivation only among those who chose better-off targets (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Patients’ reasons for a particular comparison are associated with short-term changes in affect and self-care motivation, and warrant greater empirical and clinical attention.",
author = "Danielle Arigo and Max Cornell and Smyth, {Joshua Morrison}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/08870446.2018.1432759",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "906--924",
journal = "Psychology and Health",
issn = "0887-0446",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "7",

}

Social comparisons in adults with type 2 diabetes : Patients’ reasons for target selection. / Arigo, Danielle; Cornell, Max; Smyth, Joshua Morrison.

In: Psychology and Health, Vol. 33, No. 7, 03.07.2018, p. 906-924.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social comparisons in adults with type 2 diabetes

T2 - Patients’ reasons for target selection

AU - Arigo, Danielle

AU - Cornell, Max

AU - Smyth, Joshua Morrison

PY - 2018/7/3

Y1 - 2018/7/3

N2 - Objective: To examine reasons for selecting a social comparison target (i.e. a specific other for relative self-evaluation), and their influence on affect and motivation for self-care, in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Design: Adults with T2DM (n = 180, MA1c = 7.6%) chose to read about one of four targets. Participants rated five reasons for their choice (strongly disagree–strongly agree), and rated affect and self-care motivation before and after reading. Results:To boost confidence in my ability to manage diabetes was rated highest overall (ps < 0.01), though choosing worse-off (vs. better-off) targets was associated with to gain useful information about how to improve (p = 0.04, (Formula presented.) = 0.05). Selection in order to feel better worked for those who chose better-off targets; choosing worse-off targets for this purpose worsened mood and stress (ps < 0.04, (Formula presented.) s = 0.02). Choosing worse-off targets to learn about similar others reduced self-care motivation (p < 0.01, (Formula presented.) = 0.05). Selection in order to boost confidence showed increased motivation only among those who chose better-off targets (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Patients’ reasons for a particular comparison are associated with short-term changes in affect and self-care motivation, and warrant greater empirical and clinical attention.

AB - Objective: To examine reasons for selecting a social comparison target (i.e. a specific other for relative self-evaluation), and their influence on affect and motivation for self-care, in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Design: Adults with T2DM (n = 180, MA1c = 7.6%) chose to read about one of four targets. Participants rated five reasons for their choice (strongly disagree–strongly agree), and rated affect and self-care motivation before and after reading. Results:To boost confidence in my ability to manage diabetes was rated highest overall (ps < 0.01), though choosing worse-off (vs. better-off) targets was associated with to gain useful information about how to improve (p = 0.04, (Formula presented.) = 0.05). Selection in order to feel better worked for those who chose better-off targets; choosing worse-off targets for this purpose worsened mood and stress (ps < 0.04, (Formula presented.) s = 0.02). Choosing worse-off targets to learn about similar others reduced self-care motivation (p < 0.01, (Formula presented.) = 0.05). Selection in order to boost confidence showed increased motivation only among those who chose better-off targets (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Patients’ reasons for a particular comparison are associated with short-term changes in affect and self-care motivation, and warrant greater empirical and clinical attention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041861730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041861730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08870446.2018.1432759

DO - 10.1080/08870446.2018.1432759

M3 - Article

C2 - 29424244

AN - SCOPUS:85041861730

VL - 33

SP - 906

EP - 924

JO - Psychology and Health

JF - Psychology and Health

SN - 0887-0446

IS - 7

ER -