Social Construction as Fantasy: Reconsidering Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann’s The Social Construction of Reality after 50 Years

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ever since Berger and Luckmann published their treatment of the sociology of knowledge in 1966, older versions of the subfield have languished, been forgotten, or misrepresented, as if The Social Construction of Reality (SCR) eliminated the need to study its predecessors in Wissenssoziologie. By considering Berger’s subsequent statements about the book, along with remarks recently made by Luckmann, and then returning to the text itself, this article shows that some of the main suppositions on which SCR rests are foreign to the sociology of knowledge in its original forms, and that a number of these premises do not seem as plausible in today’s social world as they may have in the early 1960s when their authors formulated them. The unintended scholarly results of SCR’s surprising publishing success are evaluated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)37-52
Number of pages16
JournalCultural Sociology
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

social construction
sociology of knowledge

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cultural Studies
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{8a08b0cef32e46b39f9ed791725369f4,
title = "Social Construction as Fantasy: Reconsidering Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann’s The Social Construction of Reality after 50 Years",
abstract = "Ever since Berger and Luckmann published their treatment of the sociology of knowledge in 1966, older versions of the subfield have languished, been forgotten, or misrepresented, as if The Social Construction of Reality (SCR) eliminated the need to study its predecessors in Wissenssoziologie. By considering Berger’s subsequent statements about the book, along with remarks recently made by Luckmann, and then returning to the text itself, this article shows that some of the main suppositions on which SCR rests are foreign to the sociology of knowledge in its original forms, and that a number of these premises do not seem as plausible in today’s social world as they may have in the early 1960s when their authors formulated them. The unintended scholarly results of SCR’s surprising publishing success are evaluated.",
author = "Sica, {Alan M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1749975515614869",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "37--52",
journal = "Cultural Sociology",
issn = "1749-9755",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Construction as Fantasy

T2 - Reconsidering Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann’s The Social Construction of Reality after 50 Years

AU - Sica, Alan M.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Ever since Berger and Luckmann published their treatment of the sociology of knowledge in 1966, older versions of the subfield have languished, been forgotten, or misrepresented, as if The Social Construction of Reality (SCR) eliminated the need to study its predecessors in Wissenssoziologie. By considering Berger’s subsequent statements about the book, along with remarks recently made by Luckmann, and then returning to the text itself, this article shows that some of the main suppositions on which SCR rests are foreign to the sociology of knowledge in its original forms, and that a number of these premises do not seem as plausible in today’s social world as they may have in the early 1960s when their authors formulated them. The unintended scholarly results of SCR’s surprising publishing success are evaluated.

AB - Ever since Berger and Luckmann published their treatment of the sociology of knowledge in 1966, older versions of the subfield have languished, been forgotten, or misrepresented, as if The Social Construction of Reality (SCR) eliminated the need to study its predecessors in Wissenssoziologie. By considering Berger’s subsequent statements about the book, along with remarks recently made by Luckmann, and then returning to the text itself, this article shows that some of the main suppositions on which SCR rests are foreign to the sociology of knowledge in its original forms, and that a number of these premises do not seem as plausible in today’s social world as they may have in the early 1960s when their authors formulated them. The unintended scholarly results of SCR’s surprising publishing success are evaluated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956694817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956694817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1749975515614869

DO - 10.1177/1749975515614869

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84956694817

VL - 10

SP - 37

EP - 52

JO - Cultural Sociology

JF - Cultural Sociology

SN - 1749-9755

IS - 1

ER -