Social networking for scientists: An analysis on how and why academics use ResearchGate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the usage and utility of ResearchGate (RG), which is a social networking site where scientists disseminate their work and build their reputations. In a sample consisting largely of American and European academics, the authors analyzed the ways they use the site, what they thought about the site's utility, and the effects of usage on career outcomes. Design/methodology/approach - The authors employed an online survey approach to target scientists who have an active RG account. Scientists who were not users were also recruited in order to get a better idea of the reasons for their nonuse. Findings - Most academics who have an RG account did not use it very heavily. Users did not perceive many benefits from using the site, and RG use was not related to career satisfaction or informational benefits, but was related to productivity and stress. Research limitations/implications - Systematic research is needed to explore positive and negative consequences of using professional social media in academia, especially productivity and stress. Findings also suggest that RG needs to increase user engagement. Originality/value - This study is one of the first to closely examine how and why people in academia use professional social media sites and whether usage leads to perceived benefits and effects on more general career outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)744-759
Number of pages16
JournalOnline Information Review
Volume41
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

networking
Productivity
career
social media
productivity
online survey
reputation
methodology
Values

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Information Systems
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

@article{431e26d5273c48909e214cc26173826f,
title = "Social networking for scientists: An analysis on how and why academics use ResearchGate",
abstract = "Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the usage and utility of ResearchGate (RG), which is a social networking site where scientists disseminate their work and build their reputations. In a sample consisting largely of American and European academics, the authors analyzed the ways they use the site, what they thought about the site's utility, and the effects of usage on career outcomes. Design/methodology/approach - The authors employed an online survey approach to target scientists who have an active RG account. Scientists who were not users were also recruited in order to get a better idea of the reasons for their nonuse. Findings - Most academics who have an RG account did not use it very heavily. Users did not perceive many benefits from using the site, and RG use was not related to career satisfaction or informational benefits, but was related to productivity and stress. Research limitations/implications - Systematic research is needed to explore positive and negative consequences of using professional social media in academia, especially productivity and stress. Findings also suggest that RG needs to increase user engagement. Originality/value - This study is one of the first to closely examine how and why people in academia use professional social media sites and whether usage leads to perceived benefits and effects on more general career outcomes.",
author = "Muscanell, {Nicole Lori} and Sonja Utz",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/OIR-07-2016-0185",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "744--759",
journal = "Online Information Review",
issn = "1468-4527",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

Social networking for scientists : An analysis on how and why academics use ResearchGate. / Muscanell, Nicole Lori; Utz, Sonja.

In: Online Information Review, Vol. 41, No. 5, 01.01.2017, p. 744-759.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social networking for scientists

T2 - An analysis on how and why academics use ResearchGate

AU - Muscanell, Nicole Lori

AU - Utz, Sonja

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the usage and utility of ResearchGate (RG), which is a social networking site where scientists disseminate their work and build their reputations. In a sample consisting largely of American and European academics, the authors analyzed the ways they use the site, what they thought about the site's utility, and the effects of usage on career outcomes. Design/methodology/approach - The authors employed an online survey approach to target scientists who have an active RG account. Scientists who were not users were also recruited in order to get a better idea of the reasons for their nonuse. Findings - Most academics who have an RG account did not use it very heavily. Users did not perceive many benefits from using the site, and RG use was not related to career satisfaction or informational benefits, but was related to productivity and stress. Research limitations/implications - Systematic research is needed to explore positive and negative consequences of using professional social media in academia, especially productivity and stress. Findings also suggest that RG needs to increase user engagement. Originality/value - This study is one of the first to closely examine how and why people in academia use professional social media sites and whether usage leads to perceived benefits and effects on more general career outcomes.

AB - Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the usage and utility of ResearchGate (RG), which is a social networking site where scientists disseminate their work and build their reputations. In a sample consisting largely of American and European academics, the authors analyzed the ways they use the site, what they thought about the site's utility, and the effects of usage on career outcomes. Design/methodology/approach - The authors employed an online survey approach to target scientists who have an active RG account. Scientists who were not users were also recruited in order to get a better idea of the reasons for their nonuse. Findings - Most academics who have an RG account did not use it very heavily. Users did not perceive many benefits from using the site, and RG use was not related to career satisfaction or informational benefits, but was related to productivity and stress. Research limitations/implications - Systematic research is needed to explore positive and negative consequences of using professional social media in academia, especially productivity and stress. Findings also suggest that RG needs to increase user engagement. Originality/value - This study is one of the first to closely examine how and why people in academia use professional social media sites and whether usage leads to perceived benefits and effects on more general career outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028753558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028753558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/OIR-07-2016-0185

DO - 10.1108/OIR-07-2016-0185

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85028753558

VL - 41

SP - 744

EP - 759

JO - Online Information Review

JF - Online Information Review

SN - 1468-4527

IS - 5

ER -