TY - JOUR
T1 - Social Networks and Transnational Social Fields
T2 - A Review of Quantitative and Mixed-Methods Approaches
AU - Lubbers, Miranda Jessica
AU - Verdery, Ashton M.
AU - Molina, José Luis
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors acknowledge a grant of the Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness – Government of Spain (MINECO-FEDER; CSO2015-68687-P). Ashton Verdery acknowledges assistance provided by the Population Research Institute, which is supported by an infrastructure grant by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24-HD041025), and the Institute for CyberScience at Penn State University.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018.
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Scholars of transnationalism have argued that migrants create transnational social fields or spaces that connect their place of origin to destination areas. Despite the centrality that social networks have in the definition of these concepts, quantitative and mixed-methods social network research is rare in research on transnationalism. This situation, however, has changed over the last decade, and the transnational social networks of migrants have been studied with multiple methodologies. So far, this literature has not been systematically evaluated. With the aim of taking stock of this research, we classify the literature into four types of approaches (individual, household, dyad/small set, and community) and review their distinct contributions regarding the functioning of immigrants’ transnational networks, as well as the relative strengths and limitations of each approach. On the basis of our analysis, we discuss pathways for future investigation.
AB - Scholars of transnationalism have argued that migrants create transnational social fields or spaces that connect their place of origin to destination areas. Despite the centrality that social networks have in the definition of these concepts, quantitative and mixed-methods social network research is rare in research on transnationalism. This situation, however, has changed over the last decade, and the transnational social networks of migrants have been studied with multiple methodologies. So far, this literature has not been systematically evaluated. With the aim of taking stock of this research, we classify the literature into four types of approaches (individual, household, dyad/small set, and community) and review their distinct contributions regarding the functioning of immigrants’ transnational networks, as well as the relative strengths and limitations of each approach. On the basis of our analysis, we discuss pathways for future investigation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059898155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059898155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0197918318812343
DO - 10.1177/0197918318812343
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85059898155
SN - 0197-9183
VL - 54
SP - 177
EP - 204
JO - International Migration Review
JF - International Migration Review
IS - 1
ER -