Social organization, collective sentiment, and legal sanctions in murder cases

Eric P. Baumer, Kimberly H. Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

The traditional "jurisprudential model" of law views the application of legal sanctions primarily as a function of the facts of the case and the rules that govern the proceedings. Sociology of law scholars have challenged this model on theoretical grounds, arguing persuasively that law is variable and often yields patterns that parallel broader considerations of community social organization and collective sentiment. The authors' analysis yields evidence that the certainty and severity of sanctions for murder cases are heightened where social capital is more plentiful, religious fundamentalist values more prevalent, and support for punitive sanctions is greater. They also find that sentences given to murder defendants are longer in areas in which the public expresses higher levels of fear. Overall, the findings provide provocative evidence that legal outcomes in murder cases are influenced by several features of the social environments in which they are processed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-182
Number of pages52
JournalAmerican Journal of Sociology
Volume119
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Social organization, collective sentiment, and legal sanctions in murder cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this