Socioeconomic Differences in Use of Low-Value Cancer Screenings and Distributional Effects in Medicare

Wendy Yi Xu, Jeah Kyoungrae Jung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Consuming low-value health care not only highlights inefficient resource use but also brings an important concern regarding the economics of disparities. We identify the relation of socioeconomic characteristics to the use of low-value cancer screenings in Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) settings, and quantify the amount subsidized from nonusers and taxpayers to users of these screenings. Data Sources: 2007–2013 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, Medicare FFS claims, and the Area Health Resource Files. Study Design: Our sample included enrollees in FFS Part B for the entire calendar year. We excluded beneficiaries with a claims-documented or self-reported history of targeted cancers, or those enrolled in Medicaid or Medicare Advantage plans. We identified use of low-value Pap smears, mammograms, and prostate-specific antigen tests based on established algorithms, and estimated a logistic model with year dummies separately for each test. Data Collection/Extraction Methods: Secondary data analyses. Principal Findings: We found a statistically significant positive association between privileged socioeconomic characteristics and use of low-value screenings. Having higher income and supplemental private insurance strongly predicted more net subsidies from Medicare. Conclusions: FFS enrollees who are better off in terms of sociodemographic characteristics receive greater subsidies from taxpayers for using low-value cancer screenings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1772-1793
Number of pages22
JournalHealth Services Research
Volume52
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Fee-for-Service Plans
Medicare
Early Detection of Cancer
Medicare Part C
Papanicolaou Test
Health Resources
Information Storage and Retrieval
Medicaid
Prostate-Specific Antigen
Insurance
Logistic Models
Economics
Delivery of Health Care
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{1614dd34d5bb4154a584e50106f8fb30,
title = "Socioeconomic Differences in Use of Low-Value Cancer Screenings and Distributional Effects in Medicare",
abstract = "Objective: Consuming low-value health care not only highlights inefficient resource use but also brings an important concern regarding the economics of disparities. We identify the relation of socioeconomic characteristics to the use of low-value cancer screenings in Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) settings, and quantify the amount subsidized from nonusers and taxpayers to users of these screenings. Data Sources: 2007–2013 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, Medicare FFS claims, and the Area Health Resource Files. Study Design: Our sample included enrollees in FFS Part B for the entire calendar year. We excluded beneficiaries with a claims-documented or self-reported history of targeted cancers, or those enrolled in Medicaid or Medicare Advantage plans. We identified use of low-value Pap smears, mammograms, and prostate-specific antigen tests based on established algorithms, and estimated a logistic model with year dummies separately for each test. Data Collection/Extraction Methods: Secondary data analyses. Principal Findings: We found a statistically significant positive association between privileged socioeconomic characteristics and use of low-value screenings. Having higher income and supplemental private insurance strongly predicted more net subsidies from Medicare. Conclusions: FFS enrollees who are better off in terms of sociodemographic characteristics receive greater subsidies from taxpayers for using low-value cancer screenings.",
author = "Xu, {Wendy Yi} and Jung, {Jeah Kyoungrae}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/1475-6773.12559",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "1772--1793",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

Socioeconomic Differences in Use of Low-Value Cancer Screenings and Distributional Effects in Medicare. / Xu, Wendy Yi; Jung, Jeah Kyoungrae.

In: Health Services Research, Vol. 52, No. 5, 10.2017, p. 1772-1793.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socioeconomic Differences in Use of Low-Value Cancer Screenings and Distributional Effects in Medicare

AU - Xu, Wendy Yi

AU - Jung, Jeah Kyoungrae

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - Objective: Consuming low-value health care not only highlights inefficient resource use but also brings an important concern regarding the economics of disparities. We identify the relation of socioeconomic characteristics to the use of low-value cancer screenings in Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) settings, and quantify the amount subsidized from nonusers and taxpayers to users of these screenings. Data Sources: 2007–2013 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, Medicare FFS claims, and the Area Health Resource Files. Study Design: Our sample included enrollees in FFS Part B for the entire calendar year. We excluded beneficiaries with a claims-documented or self-reported history of targeted cancers, or those enrolled in Medicaid or Medicare Advantage plans. We identified use of low-value Pap smears, mammograms, and prostate-specific antigen tests based on established algorithms, and estimated a logistic model with year dummies separately for each test. Data Collection/Extraction Methods: Secondary data analyses. Principal Findings: We found a statistically significant positive association between privileged socioeconomic characteristics and use of low-value screenings. Having higher income and supplemental private insurance strongly predicted more net subsidies from Medicare. Conclusions: FFS enrollees who are better off in terms of sociodemographic characteristics receive greater subsidies from taxpayers for using low-value cancer screenings.

AB - Objective: Consuming low-value health care not only highlights inefficient resource use but also brings an important concern regarding the economics of disparities. We identify the relation of socioeconomic characteristics to the use of low-value cancer screenings in Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) settings, and quantify the amount subsidized from nonusers and taxpayers to users of these screenings. Data Sources: 2007–2013 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, Medicare FFS claims, and the Area Health Resource Files. Study Design: Our sample included enrollees in FFS Part B for the entire calendar year. We excluded beneficiaries with a claims-documented or self-reported history of targeted cancers, or those enrolled in Medicaid or Medicare Advantage plans. We identified use of low-value Pap smears, mammograms, and prostate-specific antigen tests based on established algorithms, and estimated a logistic model with year dummies separately for each test. Data Collection/Extraction Methods: Secondary data analyses. Principal Findings: We found a statistically significant positive association between privileged socioeconomic characteristics and use of low-value screenings. Having higher income and supplemental private insurance strongly predicted more net subsidies from Medicare. Conclusions: FFS enrollees who are better off in terms of sociodemographic characteristics receive greater subsidies from taxpayers for using low-value cancer screenings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84993965254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84993965254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1475-6773.12559

DO - 10.1111/1475-6773.12559

M3 - Article

C2 - 27624875

AN - SCOPUS:84993965254

VL - 52

SP - 1772

EP - 1793

JO - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

IS - 5

ER -