Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms

Teacher perspectives and strategies

Troy D. Sadler, Aidin Amirshokoohi, Mahsa Kazempour, Kathleen M. Allspaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study explored teacher perspectives on the use of socioscientific issues (SSI) and on dealing with ethics in the context of science instruction. Twenty-two middle and high school science teachers from three US states participated in semi-structured interviews, and researchers employed inductive analyses to explore emergent patterns relative to the following two questions. (1) How do science teachers conceptualize the place of ethics in science and science education? (2) How do science teachers handle topics with ethical implications and expression of their own values in their classrooms? Profiles were developed to capture the views and reported practices, relative to the place of ethics in science and science classrooms, of participants. Profile A comprising teachers who embraced the notion of infusing science curricula with SSI and cited examples of using controversial topics in their classes. Profile B participants supported SSI curricula in theory but reported significant constraints which prohibited them from actualizing these goals. Profile C described teachers who were non-committal with respect to focusing instruction on SSI and ethics. Profile D was based on the position that science and science education should be value-free. Profile E transcended the question of ethics in science education; these teachers felt very strongly that all education should contribute to their students' ethical development. Participants also expressed a wide range of perspectives regarding the expression of their own values in the classroom. Implications of this research for science education are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)353-376
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Research in Science Teaching
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2006

Fingerprint

moral philosophy
classroom
teacher
science
education
instruction
Values
curriculum
interview

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

Sadler, Troy D. ; Amirshokoohi, Aidin ; Kazempour, Mahsa ; Allspaw, Kathleen M. / Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms : Teacher perspectives and strategies. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2006 ; Vol. 43, No. 4. pp. 353-376.
@article{0a5c74b7f8df4b96bceedabe814aac8e,
title = "Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies",
abstract = "This study explored teacher perspectives on the use of socioscientific issues (SSI) and on dealing with ethics in the context of science instruction. Twenty-two middle and high school science teachers from three US states participated in semi-structured interviews, and researchers employed inductive analyses to explore emergent patterns relative to the following two questions. (1) How do science teachers conceptualize the place of ethics in science and science education? (2) How do science teachers handle topics with ethical implications and expression of their own values in their classrooms? Profiles were developed to capture the views and reported practices, relative to the place of ethics in science and science classrooms, of participants. Profile A comprising teachers who embraced the notion of infusing science curricula with SSI and cited examples of using controversial topics in their classes. Profile B participants supported SSI curricula in theory but reported significant constraints which prohibited them from actualizing these goals. Profile C described teachers who were non-committal with respect to focusing instruction on SSI and ethics. Profile D was based on the position that science and science education should be value-free. Profile E transcended the question of ethics in science education; these teachers felt very strongly that all education should contribute to their students' ethical development. Participants also expressed a wide range of perspectives regarding the expression of their own values in the classroom. Implications of this research for science education are discussed.",
author = "Sadler, {Troy D.} and Aidin Amirshokoohi and Mahsa Kazempour and Allspaw, {Kathleen M.}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/tea.20142",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "353--376",
journal = "Journal of Research in Science Teaching",
issn = "0022-4308",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms : Teacher perspectives and strategies. / Sadler, Troy D.; Amirshokoohi, Aidin; Kazempour, Mahsa; Allspaw, Kathleen M.

In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 43, No. 4, 01.04.2006, p. 353-376.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms

T2 - Teacher perspectives and strategies

AU - Sadler, Troy D.

AU - Amirshokoohi, Aidin

AU - Kazempour, Mahsa

AU - Allspaw, Kathleen M.

PY - 2006/4/1

Y1 - 2006/4/1

N2 - This study explored teacher perspectives on the use of socioscientific issues (SSI) and on dealing with ethics in the context of science instruction. Twenty-two middle and high school science teachers from three US states participated in semi-structured interviews, and researchers employed inductive analyses to explore emergent patterns relative to the following two questions. (1) How do science teachers conceptualize the place of ethics in science and science education? (2) How do science teachers handle topics with ethical implications and expression of their own values in their classrooms? Profiles were developed to capture the views and reported practices, relative to the place of ethics in science and science classrooms, of participants. Profile A comprising teachers who embraced the notion of infusing science curricula with SSI and cited examples of using controversial topics in their classes. Profile B participants supported SSI curricula in theory but reported significant constraints which prohibited them from actualizing these goals. Profile C described teachers who were non-committal with respect to focusing instruction on SSI and ethics. Profile D was based on the position that science and science education should be value-free. Profile E transcended the question of ethics in science education; these teachers felt very strongly that all education should contribute to their students' ethical development. Participants also expressed a wide range of perspectives regarding the expression of their own values in the classroom. Implications of this research for science education are discussed.

AB - This study explored teacher perspectives on the use of socioscientific issues (SSI) and on dealing with ethics in the context of science instruction. Twenty-two middle and high school science teachers from three US states participated in semi-structured interviews, and researchers employed inductive analyses to explore emergent patterns relative to the following two questions. (1) How do science teachers conceptualize the place of ethics in science and science education? (2) How do science teachers handle topics with ethical implications and expression of their own values in their classrooms? Profiles were developed to capture the views and reported practices, relative to the place of ethics in science and science classrooms, of participants. Profile A comprising teachers who embraced the notion of infusing science curricula with SSI and cited examples of using controversial topics in their classes. Profile B participants supported SSI curricula in theory but reported significant constraints which prohibited them from actualizing these goals. Profile C described teachers who were non-committal with respect to focusing instruction on SSI and ethics. Profile D was based on the position that science and science education should be value-free. Profile E transcended the question of ethics in science education; these teachers felt very strongly that all education should contribute to their students' ethical development. Participants also expressed a wide range of perspectives regarding the expression of their own values in the classroom. Implications of this research for science education are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645796852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645796852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/tea.20142

DO - 10.1002/tea.20142

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 353

EP - 376

JO - Journal of Research in Science Teaching

JF - Journal of Research in Science Teaching

SN - 0022-4308

IS - 4

ER -